The Diaspora that Fuels Development

Op-Ed Carnegie
Related Topics
Related Media and Tools
 

Originally published June 9 2002 in the Financial Times

Lucio Garcia, a gardener in Merrifield, Virginia, speaks daily to his family in a remote town in Bolivia using a prepaid phonecard that costs him a few cents a minute. Edie Baron Levi, a Mexican congressman, commutes weekly from Mexico City to Los Angeles, where he and his constituents reside. Iqbal Farouqi, a Pakistani waiter working in Milan, has used the money he earns to purchase two small trucks in Karachi that he rents to relatives and manages via the internet.

This is not your parents' diaspora. Globalisation has greatly expanded the means through which people in one country can remain involved in another country's cultural, economic and political life. Money transfers, travel and communications, networks and associations of nationals living abroad - these and other opportunities for expatriates to live in one country even as they reside in another, may be creating a powerful new source of prosperity for developing countries.

In the old days, the main methods for communities of migrants to keep in touch with their homelands and their cultures were through language, cooking recipes and the occasional letter or visit to their countries of origin. Now, cheaper travel allows more frequent visits and enables more friends and family to reciprocate. Trade liberalisation and export promotion mean that more goods from the old countries are available in the new ones.

Migrants can sip their morning coffee while reading online newspapers from their homeland or even listening to the radio station they left behind. In the evening, satellite dishes allow immigrants to catch the day's local news of their native countries. Phone calls home are a fraction of their cost a decade ago, fuelling a fivefold increase in the number of minutes billed to prepaid phone cards since 1997 and making such cards a $4bn-a-year market in the US alone. And none of these privileges is necessarily limited to the well-to-do.

Moreover, the deregulation of international financial markets, coupled with new technologies, has made sending money home safer, easier and cheaper. Last year, people residing abroad sent home more than $100bn. For many families, the money sent by relatives overseas spells the difference between relative poverty and total indigence.

The same is true for many countries, too. Worker remittances account for 24 per cent of Nicaragua's gross domestic product, 14.5 per cent of Uganda's and 7 per cent of Bangladesh's. In Mexico, remittances are the third largest source of foreign exchange, after oil exports and tourism. And in Turkey they are four times larger than the country's inflows of foreign direct investment. In most developing countries, remittances are far larger than funds received through foreign portfolio investment or official development assistance.

But the impact of these economic ties goes well beyond supporting individual relatives or helping to rebuild a local school. Surveys show that about 10 per cent of Hispanic immigrants in the US also trade with their home countries. Indeed, the engagement of immigrants in international trade can have a significant economic impact. As James Rauch of the University of California, San Diego, has noted*, over time a 10 per cent increase in immigrants to the US will increase US exports to the country of origin by 4.7 per cent and US imports from the country of origin by 8.3 per cent. Prof Rauch also reports that in Canada a 10 per cent increase in immigrants from a given country eventually increases Canadian exports to that country by 1.3 per cent and imports from there by 3.3 per cent.

Successful entrepreneurs who are foreign-born often become important investors in their home countries. They bring back not just money but also an infusion of entrepreneurial spirit and skills that their home countries often sorely lack. A survey by the Public Policy Institute of California has found that foreign-born (particularly Chinese and Indian) highly skilled immigrants in Silicon Valley have successfully adopted both the technological capability and the venture-financed, high-growth business model that distinguishes many US companies in the high- technology sectors. Half the respondents to this survey have set up subsidiaries, joint ventures, subcontracting operations or other businesses in their native countries.

This trend surely challenges the traditional idea of the brain drain. Whereas the talented engineers, scientists and managers who migrated abroad used to maintain few ties to their home countries, today a new pattern is being established: a brain gain that provides opportunities for trade and foreign investment as well as a powerful fount of entrepreneurial energy. As the Public Policy Institutes study notes, the brain drain (in the case of the Chinese and Indian professionals it surveyed) has been replaced by brain circulation, meaning a variety of two-way flows of highly skilled workers between the technologically advanced countries where they reside and the less developed countries where they were born.

Politicians and governments have increasingly focused on tapping the money and political power of this new breed of expatriates. Jairo Martinez, one of many Colombians living in Miami, recently won a seat in the Colombian Congress representing his compatriots living abroad. Mexican politicians routinely campaign and raise funds in Los Angeles, Houston and other US cities.

But tapping the wealth of resources and talents contained in immigrant communities largely for political gain seems a wasted opportunity. Just as governments have made it a national priority to entice multinational corporations and international fund managers to invest in their countries, so they should make the seduction of the new diaspora central to their strategies for development.

Creating as many opportunities as possible for expatriates to live in their own country even while residing abroad - facilitating money transfers, travel and communications, for example - ought to figure highly in the list of urgent tasks of governments everywhere.


End of document
 
Source http://carnegieendowment.org/2002/06/09/diaspora-that-fuels-development/1mo0

In Fact

 

45%

of the Chinese general public

believe their country should share a global leadership role.

30%

of Indian parliamentarians

have criminal cases pending against them.

140

charter schools in the United States

are linked to Turkey’s Gülen movement.

2.5–5

thousand tons of chemical weapons

are in North Korea’s possession.

92%

of import tariffs

among Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru have been eliminated.

$2.34

trillion a year

is unaccounted for in official Chinese income statistics.

37%

of GDP in oil-exporting Arab countries

comes from the mining sector.

72%

of Europeans and Turks

are opposed to intervention in Syria.

90%

of Russian exports to China

are hydrocarbons; machinery accounts for less than 1%.

13%

of undiscovered oil

is in the Arctic.

17

U.S. government shutdowns

occurred between 1976 and 1996.

40%

of Ukrainians

want an “international economic union” with the EU.

120

million electric bicycles

are used in Chinese cities.

60–70%

of the world’s energy supply

is consumed by cities.

58%

of today’s oils

require unconventional extraction techniques.

67%

of the world's population

will reside in cities by 2050.

50%

of Syria’s population

is expected to be displaced by the end of 2013.

18%

of the U.S. economy

is consumed by healthcare.

81%

of Brazilian protesters

learned about a massive rally via Facebook or Twitter.

32

million cases pending

in India’s judicial system.

1 in 3

Syrians

now needs urgent assistance.

370

political parties

contested India’s last national elections.

70%

of Egypt's labor force

works in the private sector.

70%

of oil consumed in the United States

is for the transportation sector.

20%

of Chechnya’s pre-1994 population

has fled to different parts of the world.

58%

of oil consumed in China

was from foreign sources in 2012.

$536

billion in goods and services

traded between the United States and China in 2012.

$100

billion in foreign investment and oil revenue

have been lost by Iran because of its nuclear program.

4700%

increase in China’s GDP per capita

between 1972 and today.

$11

billion have been spent

to complete the Bushehr nuclear reactor in Iran.

2%

of Iran’s electricity needs

is all the Bushehr nuclear reactor provides.

78

journalists

were imprisoned in Turkey as of August 2012 according to the OSCE.

Stay in the Know

Enter your email address to receive the latest Carnegie analysis in your inbox!

Personal Information
 
 
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
 
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036-2103 Phone: 202 483 7600 Fax: 202 483 1840
Please note...

You are leaving the website for the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy and entering a website for another of Carnegie's global centers.

请注意...

你将离开清华—卡内基中心网站,进入卡内基其他全球中心的网站。