Aiding Governance in Developing Countries: Progress Amid Uncertainties

Thomas Carothers, Diane de Gramont Paper November 29, 2011
Summary
International aid donors have learned important lessons about how to provide effective governance assistance to developing countries, but turning these insights into practice remains a major challenge.
Related Media and Tools
 
  • Email

Since emerging as a new donor enthusiasm in the 1990s, governance support has become a major area of aid to developing countries. The idea that remedying debilitating patterns of inefficient, corrupt, and unaccountable governance will unlock developmental progress appeals not just to aid providers but also to ordinary people throughout the developing world who are angry at unresponsive and poorly functioning states. Yet despite the natural appeal of improving governance, it has proved challenging in practice. Many initial assumptions about the task have run aground on the shoals of countervailing realities. As a result, aid practitioners have begun accumulating important insights about how to improve governance aid:

  • Governance deficiencies are often primarily political and cannot be resolved through technical assistance alone.
     
  • Fostering citizen demand for better governance is as important as topdown efforts aimed at improving the “supply” of governance.
     
  • Governance aid may be more effective at the local level than at the national level.
     
  • Despite the intuitive appeal of governance best practices, concentrating on locally determined “best fit” may be more productive.
     
  • Informal institutions are a central part of the governance puzzle and cannot be treated as developmental marginalia.
     
  • Governance concerns should be integrated into the full range of assistance programming.
     
  • Donor countries should address international drivers of poor governance.
     
  • Aiding governance effectively requires development agencies to rethink their own internal governance.

These eight insights represent the framework of an emergent but still tentative second generation of governance support. Often embraced in principle, they are still far from being widely implemented in practice.

Even as governance assistance progresses, it struggles with several continuing uncertainties. The empirical case that improved governance is necessary for development progress is less straightforward than many aid practitioners would wish. The increasing pressure faced by most aid organizations for rapid, clearly measurable results sometimes works against sophisticated governance assistance. Larger international aid trends, especially the rise of new donors with other priorities, threaten to weaken the governance agenda.

Fully operationalizing these insights and overcoming the uncertainties will be hard. But the central promise of governance assistance—finally getting to the heart of the development challenge—is great enough to justify the effort and to ensure that even partial success will be worthwhile.

Comments (5)

 
 
  • CDRnik May 7, 2012 4:26 PM
    These eight points seems far from fundamental. Two fundamental determinants of poor governance are corruption and lack of expertise. Where are they represented in the eight points. There is a danger in drawing secondary lessons before the primary lessons are fully absorbed.
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
  • Milena June 18, 2012 10:06 AM
    The full text link does not work!
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
  • Carnegie web June 18, 2012 10:20 AM
    Milena -- the link seems to be working on our end. Sometimes, pdf downloads can act up in certain versions of Firefox, or be slow due to spotty internet connection. If you continue having trouble with this, please contact info@CarnegieEndowment.org and use the subject line 'Trouble accessing a full text link' and we would be happy to help figure out why you are having trouble.
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
  • Milena June 24, 2012 1:26 AM
    Thanks much, Carnegie web!
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
  • Carnegie web June 25, 2012 1:33 PM
    Happy to help!
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
  • Report Abuse
Source: http://carnegieendowment.org/2011/11/29/aiding-governance-in-developing-countries-progress-amid-uncertainties/8ki0

More from The Global Think Tank

In Fact

 

70%

of oil consumed in the United States

is for the transportation sector.

20%

of Chechnya’s pre-1994 population

has fled to different parts of the world.

58%

of oil consumed in China

was from foreign sources in 2012.

32

million cases pending

in India’s judicial system.

20

million people killed

in Cold War conflicts.

18%

of the U.S. economy

is consumed by healthcare.

$536

billion in goods and services

traded between the United States and China in 2012.

$100

billion in foreign investment and oil revenue

have been lost by Iran because of its nuclear program.

4700%

increase in China’s GDP per capita

between 1972 and today.

$11

billion have been spent

to complete the Bushehr nuclear reactor in Iran.

2%

of Iran’s electricity needs

is all the Bushehr nuclear reactor provides.

82

new airports

are set to be built in China by 2015.

78

journalists

were imprisoned in Turkey as of August 2012 according to the OSCE.

67%

of the world's population

will reside in cities by 2050.

16

million Russian citizens

are considered “ethnic Muslims.”

Stay in the Know

Enter your email address in the field below to receive the latest Carnegie analysis in your inbox!

Personal Information
 
 
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
 
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036-2103 Phone: 202 483 7600 Fax: 202 483 1840
Please note...

You are leaving the website for the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy and entering a website for another of Carnegie's global centers.

请注意...

你将离开清华—卡内基中心网站,进入卡内基其他全球中心的网站。