China's One-Child Policy Should be Ended—Quickly

Source: Getty
Article
Summary
Rising income, not the one-child policy, has driven down China's fertility rate. The policy has outgrown its limited purpose and should be ended to reverse lingering gender imbalances.
Related Topics
Related Media and Tools
 

Over 30 years ago, in 1980, China launched its one-child policy.  Today, the country’s demographic dividend is spent.  Its labor force is set to decline in absolute terms.  The old-age dependency ratio (the number of people above the age of 65 for every person of working age) is expected to double over the next two decades, reaching the level of Norway or the Netherlands by 2030.  Some observers have put two and two together and argued that the one-child policy has been the reason behind this demographic transition.

But that’s not so.  The sharp decline in China’s fertility rate—from 5.9 in 1960–1965 to near 1.5 today—would probably have occurred anyway.  After all, other rapidly growing East Asian countries also have fertility rates that have declined just as fast as China’s—such as Korea, Thailand, and even Indonesia (although Indonesia, with a lower per capita income, is behind by a couple of decades—see graph).  And none of them had a one-child policy.

The reason behind declining fertility rates in most countries is rising incomes and living standards.  As these factors rise, health services improve, which in turn reduces infant and child mortality.  Couples don’t find it necessary to have many children to help them in their old age.   Higher incomes and more education, especially for young girls, means that women tend to have fewer children later in life.  Moreover, children become less important as a safety net in old age as other social security instruments become available.  And with higher incomes, education is less a luxury and more a necessity—and the cost of education becomes an important factor in deciding family size.

It is true that these factors were not predominant in the decisionmaking of most Chinese couples.  Their decisions were dictated by the one-child policy.  But had the one-child policy not been in place, there is a strong likelihood that the decision to have fewer children would have been voluntary with exactly the same results—just as it was in Thailand and Korea.

Interestingly, China’s one-child policy was not applied uniformly across the country.  Urban areas were stricter than rural ones, and different provinces had different rules.  Minorities were usually exempted.  When couples had a child with disabilities, they were allowed to have a second child.  Given the preference of most Chinese to have at least one son, those with a daughter were sometimes allowed to have another child (especially in rural areas).

More recently, some provincial governments have relaxed the requirements in a few select areas as a policy experiment.  In most, if not all cases, the fertility rate has barely budged.  All this suggests that if the one-child policy were to be removed tomorrow, China’s fertility rate would probably not rise appreciably.  And even if it did, it would be a one-off increase and would immediately begin to fall again.  Indeed, if China were to grant its rural population and urban migrants the same access to social services as urban residents enjoy, the fertility rate is likely to decline even faster.

So removing the one-child policy will unlikely have any impact on the overall population of China.  The government recognizes this and is beginning to dismantle it, albeit slowly.  This slow pace is unfortunate for two reasons.  First, parents choosing a second child are prevented from having one on account of the policy, and in some cases may be forced to undergo an abortion.   As important, the one-child policy is an important factor contributing to China’s “missing women”—there are over 30 million fewer women in China today than would be the case if its gender balance resembled that of other countries.  This has occurred for a number of reasons: sex-selective abortions, infanticide, neglect, or abandonment.  Some of this can be attributed to the constraints imposed on families as a result of the one-child policy, and is all the more reason China should accelerate the removal of the one-child policy.

Rising income, not the one-child policy, has driven down China's fertility rate. The policy has outgrown its limited purpose and should be ended to reverse lingering gender imbalances. Source:  United Nations. 2011.  “World Population Prospects:  The 2010 Revision”, United Nations Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Excel-Data/fertility.htm)

End of document

About the Asia Program

The Carnegie Asia Program in Beijing and Washington provides clear and precise analysis to policy makers on the complex economic, security, and political developments in the Asia-Pacific region.

 

Comments

 
Source http://carnegieendowment.org/2012/03/05/china-s-one-child-policy-should-be-ended-quickly/a0jl

More from The Global Think Tank

In Fact

 

45%

of the Chinese general public

believe their country should share a global leadership role.

30%

of Indian parliamentarians

have criminal cases pending against them.

140

charter schools in the United States

are linked to Turkey’s Gülen movement.

2.5–5

thousand tons of chemical weapons

are in North Korea’s possession.

92%

of import tariffs

among Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru have been eliminated.

$2.34

trillion a year

is unaccounted for in official Chinese income statistics.

37%

of GDP in oil-exporting Arab countries

comes from the mining sector.

72%

of Europeans and Turks

are opposed to intervention in Syria.

90%

of Russian exports to China

are hydrocarbons; machinery accounts for less than 1%.

13%

of undiscovered oil

is in the Arctic.

17

U.S. government shutdowns

occurred between 1976 and 1996.

40%

of Ukrainians

want an “international economic union” with the EU.

120

million electric bicycles

are used in Chinese cities.

60–70%

of the world’s energy supply

is consumed by cities.

58%

of today’s oils

require unconventional extraction techniques.

67%

of the world's population

will reside in cities by 2050.

50%

of Syria’s population

is expected to be displaced by the end of 2013.

18%

of the U.S. economy

is consumed by healthcare.

81%

of Brazilian protesters

learned about a massive rally via Facebook or Twitter.

32

million cases pending

in India’s judicial system.

1 in 3

Syrians

now needs urgent assistance.

370

political parties

contested India’s last national elections.

70%

of Egypt's labor force

works in the private sector.

70%

of oil consumed in the United States

is for the transportation sector.

20%

of Chechnya’s pre-1994 population

has fled to different parts of the world.

58%

of oil consumed in China

was from foreign sources in 2012.

$536

billion in goods and services

traded between the United States and China in 2012.

$100

billion in foreign investment and oil revenue

have been lost by Iran because of its nuclear program.

4700%

increase in China’s GDP per capita

between 1972 and today.

$11

billion have been spent

to complete the Bushehr nuclear reactor in Iran.

2%

of Iran’s electricity needs

is all the Bushehr nuclear reactor provides.

78

journalists

were imprisoned in Turkey as of August 2012 according to the OSCE.

Stay in the Know

Enter your email address in the field below to receive the latest Carnegie analysis in your inbox!

Personal Information
 
 
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
 
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036-2103 Phone: 202 483 7600 Fax: 202 483 1840
Please note...

You are leaving the website for the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy and entering a website for another of Carnegie's global centers.

请注意...

你将离开清华—卡内基中心网站,进入卡内基其他全球中心的网站。