Aung San Suu Kyi Must Transition Too

Source: Getty
Op-Ed Wall Street Journal
Summary
As Burma moves away from domestic authoritarianism and international isolation, Aung San Suu Kyi will have to represent the people's aspirations as an opposition leader in parliament and support Burma's interests abroad.
Related Media and Tools
 

In her long-delayed Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech in Oslo, Aung San Suu Kyi seemed to hedge on comments she made earlier this month urging investor caution on Burma. "If I advocate cautious optimism it is not because I do not have faith in the future but because I do not want to encourage blind faith," she said on Saturday. It was an interesting moment, and a hint at the hard road the democracy-movement icon has ahead of her to become a constructive opposition leader.

The world has been transfixed by Burma's sudden, dramatic opening, and heartened by Ms. Suu Kyi's new role in parliament. She is deservedly an international symbol of courageous, non-violent opposition to military rule, having fought bravely for human rights and political freedoms while enduring house arrest for 15 of the last 20 years.

But for Burma's economic and political transition to succeed, Ms. Suu Kyi will have to evolve as well. As the country moves away from domestic authoritarianism and international isolation, Ms. Suu Kyi will have to represent the people's aspirations as opposition leader in parliament and support Burma's interests abroad. And that might mean encouraging foreign investors even if the country's economic policies and institutions are badly in need of overhaul.

The move from resistance icon to insider is always challenging, as Ms. Suu Kyi's recent trip (her first abroad since 1988) to Bangkok for the World Economic Forum shows. President Thein Sein, the architect of Burma's reforms, was slated to speak at the same forum as Ms. Suu Kyi, but had not been informed of her trip. He hastily canceled his own, so as not to run the risk of being upstaged.

At the forum itself, Ms. Suu Kyi sent an unfortunate message when she warned foreign investors that Burma's courts remain too weak to implement laws and the government is not transparent. Her speech seemed to suggest that economic development is not a priority until the rule of law is established. But it is unlikely the country's impoverished workers and peasants agree.

She could have delivered a more nuanced message instead. Such as: while Burma is justifiably reviewing its policies toward foreign investment in the extractive industries (oil, gas, gems, minerals), it warmly welcomes foreign investment in manufacturing, especially in labor-intensive export industries, and in tourism to help earn foreign exchange and provide jobs.

More importantly, the speech should have indicated how the party she helped found, the National League for Democracy, would press the government to introduce much-needed reforms to help jumpstart the economy. There are, after all, many urgent reforms that require the immediate attention of the government—from increasing power generation to providing more public transport to improving the investment climate for manufacturing.

After winning 43 of the 45 parliamentary seats contested in the by-elections held earlier this year, Ms. Suu Kyi and the NLD must now come to grips with these concrete issues. They need to have a clear understanding of the country's priorities and engage with the government to tackle them. The NLD must be willing to work with local communities, participate in the process of development and use expertise where available to identify the best way to address the country's myriad challenges.

Ms. Suu Kyi is undoubtedly correct that the rule of law must be established to provide the foundations for a just and prosperous society, but she hasn't said how will she lead the NLD to bring this about. The more immediate problems facing the poor must be addressed—the NLD needs to demonstrate it has the strategies and the capabilities to reduce poverty and jumpstart development.

The outcome of the by-elections gave a strong indication that if the 2015 elections are free and fair, the NLD will sweep the polls irrespective of the current government's performance in the intervening years. The next three years will therefore be a critical period for the NLD to prepare itself for the task of running the country.

The party needs to flesh out and test its stance on human rights, tensions in ethnic minority areas, relations with the military and the appropriate role of the private sector, foreign investors and the government in the development process. For example, following the recent ethnic violence between Rakhine Buddhists and Muslim Rohingyas in Burma's northwest, Ms. Suu Kyi said this week the country's citizenship laws should be clarified. But when asked directly whether the stateless Rohingyas ought to be considered Burmese, she said "I do not know." A firmer response to these kinds of challenges will be needed.

In short, the NLD must get serious about establishing its credibility as a competent and organized government-in-waiting that has the vision, the discipline and respect for the rule of law the current ruling party lacks. And by being a constructive partner with President Thein Sein and other reform-minded members of the government, the NLD will be able to earn their trust in return, which will ultimately allow it to assume power peacefully.

Ms. Suu Kyi is rightly idolized by her people and the world. Leveraging this goodwill to bring about real and lasting change to her country will be an even greater accomplishment than her courageous stand for human rights and freedom waged against all odds over the last two decades.

This article was originally published in the Wall Street Journal.

End of document

About the Asia Program

The Carnegie Asia Program in Beijing and Washington provides clear and precise analysis to policy makers on the complex economic, security, and political developments in the Asia-Pacific region.

 

Comments (1)

 
 
  • T-Money
    This is truly discouraging. Discouraging because Nehru should know better we're talking about a party here who just has a foot in the door in entering the Parliament less than 100 days ago. You can't fully expect NLD to have encyclopedic know-how on every issue that's popping up in Burma. (Isn't that what the government is supposed to know?)
    Considering the atrocities junta has done to the people since 1962 Daw Suu has every right to be cautious about the changes that are to be implemented in Burma. And she's doing it in the sole purpose of the benefit of the people.
    Lastly it is discouraging to see a trying body criticized (NOT critiqued). Nehru should urge the current Burmese government long held by dynasties of generals to "evolve" faster than point the usual finger on NLD -- a party that is given the permission to resume less than 2 years ago.
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
Source http://carnegieendowment.org/2012/06/20/aung-san-suu-kyi-must-transition-too/c3zi

More from The Global Think Tank

In Fact

 

45%

of the Chinese general public

believe their country should share a global leadership role.

30%

of Indian parliamentarians

have criminal cases pending against them.

140

charter schools in the United States

are linked to Turkey’s Gülen movement.

2.5–5

thousand tons of chemical weapons

are in North Korea’s possession.

92%

of import tariffs

among Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru have been eliminated.

$2.34

trillion a year

is unaccounted for in official Chinese income statistics.

37%

of GDP in oil-exporting Arab countries

comes from the mining sector.

72%

of Europeans and Turks

are opposed to intervention in Syria.

90%

of Russian exports to China

are hydrocarbons; machinery accounts for less than 1%.

13%

of undiscovered oil

is in the Arctic.

17

U.S. government shutdowns

occurred between 1976 and 1996.

40%

of Ukrainians

want an “international economic union” with the EU.

120

million electric bicycles

are used in Chinese cities.

60–70%

of the world’s energy supply

is consumed by cities.

58%

of today’s oils

require unconventional extraction techniques.

67%

of the world's population

will reside in cities by 2050.

50%

of Syria’s population

is expected to be displaced by the end of 2013.

18%

of the U.S. economy

is consumed by healthcare.

81%

of Brazilian protesters

learned about a massive rally via Facebook or Twitter.

32

million cases pending

in India’s judicial system.

1 in 3

Syrians

now needs urgent assistance.

370

political parties

contested India’s last national elections.

70%

of Egypt's labor force

works in the private sector.

70%

of oil consumed in the United States

is for the transportation sector.

20%

of Chechnya’s pre-1994 population

has fled to different parts of the world.

58%

of oil consumed in China

was from foreign sources in 2012.

$536

billion in goods and services

traded between the United States and China in 2012.

$100

billion in foreign investment and oil revenue

have been lost by Iran because of its nuclear program.

4700%

increase in China’s GDP per capita

between 1972 and today.

$11

billion have been spent

to complete the Bushehr nuclear reactor in Iran.

2%

of Iran’s electricity needs

is all the Bushehr nuclear reactor provides.

78

journalists

were imprisoned in Turkey as of August 2012 according to the OSCE.

Stay in the Know

Enter your email address in the field below to receive the latest Carnegie analysis in your inbox!

Personal Information
 
 
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
 
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036-2103 Phone: 202 483 7600 Fax: 202 483 1840
Please note...

You are leaving the website for the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy and entering a website for another of Carnegie's global centers.

请注意...

你将离开清华—卡内基中心网站,进入卡内基其他全球中心的网站。