Six Reasons for India to Look East

Source: Getty
Article
Summary
As its economy decelerates, India has a golden opportunity to look east and sustain high growth rates for years to come.
Related Media and Tools
 

India’s recent economic deceleration highlights a simple truth: the reforms of the 1990s are no longer enough. While the current slowdown is partially cyclical, growth is unlikely to return to above 8 percent per year without further reform. But India also has a golden opportunity to “look east” and sustain high growth rates for years to come.

The reform agenda is long and well understood—India needs to reform its trade, infrastructure, education, and labor markets. What is needed now is the will to act. Perhaps the sense of urgency among Indian policymakers would be heightened if they had a greater appreciation of the new, significant opportunities in East Asia that will boost India’s growth.

The long-term benefits of capturing these opportunities cannot be overestimated. Further economic reforms remain essential for India, but they must be implemented with an eye toward the east. India needs to hitch its wagon to East Asia’s growth engine.

There are six reasons—three economic and three geopolitical—for India to look and act east.

First, the combination of rising real wages and an appreciating real exchange rate in China creates an opening for India’s labor-intensive industries. These trends are a natural upshot of China’s rapid development and technological upgrading, and they will encourage the migration of labor-intensive industries to labor-surplus countries.

Because of their close proximity to China, mainland Southeast Asian economies—Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar, and Cambodia—will likely be the early beneficiaries. But India could also profit, provided it can improve its infrastructure, especially along its east coast. India’s large domestic market, industrial depth, urban centers, and sophisticated financial services are comparable to China’s in the 1990s.

Second, the coming wave of liberalization in the services trade in East Asia gives India’s strong services sector a chance to get ahead. Just as trade in manufactures drove growth in East Asia over the last three decades, trade in services is likely to drive growth in the next three. Services are relatively underdeveloped in virtually all East Asian countries and account for a small proportion of trade.

But services account for over a third of Indian exports, and access to the large markets of East Asia could give this sector a further boost. Markets in the region are gradually opening. China and the ten countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) have a trade-in-services agreement, and India recently negotiated a similar deal with ASEAN.

Third, wider regional trade agreements offer a way for these opportunities to be even more beneficial. India’s access to East Asian markets could increase further if the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership were to become a reality, especially as the agreement will cover services. The partnership, which includes ASEAN members along with Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea, would be the largest free trade agreement in the world.

Rather than being a reluctant participant in the negotiations, India should be an enthusiastic champion. The agreement will provide India with an external motive to implement desperately needed trade reforms at home and encourage India to lower trade costs (per container, India’s trade costs are more than double those in East Asia). It’s important for New Delhi to remember that, for the first time, Indian services could compete on an even playing field with Australia, Japan, and New Zealand.

Fourth, the fallout from rising Japan-China tensions over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands is forcing Japanese investors to diversify their investments away from China. Earlier, the natural choice to relocate labor-intensive operations would have been Thailand, but the vulnerability to periodic flooding there is now pointing the Japanese toward India. As a prominent Japanese conglomerate said, “Japan in the past, Thailand now, India in [the] future.”

Fifth, Southeast Asia is also looking for alternatives to China. While economic integration with China has brought considerable benefits to countries in the region, it has curtailed independence in other spheres. So just as Southeast Asia welcomed the U.S. pivot, the region is now looking to India with fresh eyes as a possible economic hedge against the growing economic clout of China.

And finally, Myanmar’s own pivot away from autarky and toward the outside world has created new opportunities for India, opening a potential land bridge to Southeast Asia and southern China. Although it maintained commercial relations with Myanmar during the military junta’s rule, India’s reputation in the country is not tainted like China’s.

Nevertheless, India has to nurture this relationship. Myanmar is in a strategic location, and many other countries are beating a path to the country’s door—India enjoys an advantage, but it must act before it is too late.

Together, these trends present a remarkable opportunity for India to integrate further with East Asia. India’s trade growth with Southeast Asia over the last decade was a healthy 20 percent per year. But New Delhi could double that as trade with India only constitutes 3 percent of Southeast Asia’s total.

Less than half of this trade is in manufactures today. India is clearly not yet a part of the East Asian production network, but it must aspire to become one. This will give it new opportunities to specialize, capture economies of scale, gain international competitiveness in a wide range of manufactures, and boost growth.

Now is the time for India to look east. And there is hope that the long-stalled reform process will once again move forward. Finance Minister Palaniappan Chidambaram has given India’s economic reformers renewed drive, as has the appointment of Raghuram Rajan as India’s new chief economic adviser. They recognize that the world—especially East Asia—is moving ahead rapidly and India cannot afford to be left behind.

Nadia Bulkin provided background research for this article.

End of document

About the Asia Program

The Carnegie Asia Program in Beijing and Washington provides clear and precise analysis to policy makers on the complex economic, security, and political developments in the Asia-Pacific region.

 

Comments (6)

 
 
  • Pradeep Sharma
    India has been short sighted for long in the developent of its foriegn policies as well as looking ahead in goal setting for sustainable growth through cooperation/investment in the neighbourhood i.e looking east .
    The service sector is what should have been addressed about ten years back;having said that, given the young age profile of India, the negative population growth else where in the world, it is to our advantage to train in need based skills addressing the countries with a manpower deficit, enterring into contracts for providing skilled workers in the desired fields. This would provide us with jobs, decongest our population and what is even more important is that it would stop/reduce illegal immigration,
    Development of good infrastructure on the Eastern Borders has additional adavantgaes that our policy makers need to think of;while this would encourgae trade, it is also of great relevance to our security and border management.
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
  • ElloraOne.com
    Interesting article. Reminiscent of early 2000 when similar policy to look East was proposed and followed through, though reluctantly. While it is true India needs to diversify its trade relations, I increasingly think that core issues needs to be resolved with laser focus determination. Infrastructure, Education, Society Values (to tackle corruption) will need to be reformed.

    I also believe India needs a multi-pronged approach to stay relevant in next decade - economically and politically.

    -Satish T
    ElloraOne.com
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
  • Dr. Rashid Ahmad Khan
    Indian ambition to move into East and West is long standing. It is not only inevitable but has the potential of bringing India important dividends, both economically and strategically. But first it should put its own house in order. More especially play its due role in promoting integration in South Asia. India can rise only by taking its neighbours together.
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
    • Anjaan replies...
      Why is that so ...... ? Can you please explain why India must take Pakistan along, if it has to rise ...... and why any other alternative bypassing Pakistan is not likely to succeed ..... ?
       
       
  • shishir agarawal.
    we need to cooprate with our neighbours .a healthy compitition good for our country.
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
  • Oinam
    Very good analysis. India's visa regime should be reviewed to facilitate easier entry of people from friendly countries.
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
 
Source http://carnegieendowment.org/2013/02/26/six-reasons-for-india-to-look-east/fktk

In Fact

 

45%

of the Chinese general public

believe their country should share a global leadership role.

30%

of Indian parliamentarians

have criminal cases pending against them.

140

charter schools in the United States

are linked to Turkey’s Gülen movement.

2.5–5

thousand tons of chemical weapons

are in North Korea’s possession.

92%

of import tariffs

among Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru have been eliminated.

$2.34

trillion a year

is unaccounted for in official Chinese income statistics.

37%

of GDP in oil-exporting Arab countries

comes from the mining sector.

72%

of Europeans and Turks

are opposed to intervention in Syria.

90%

of Russian exports to China

are hydrocarbons; machinery accounts for less than 1%.

13%

of undiscovered oil

is in the Arctic.

17

U.S. government shutdowns

occurred between 1976 and 1996.

40%

of Ukrainians

want an “international economic union” with the EU.

120

million electric bicycles

are used in Chinese cities.

60–70%

of the world’s energy supply

is consumed by cities.

58%

of today’s oils

require unconventional extraction techniques.

67%

of the world's population

will reside in cities by 2050.

50%

of Syria’s population

is expected to be displaced by the end of 2013.

18%

of the U.S. economy

is consumed by healthcare.

81%

of Brazilian protesters

learned about a massive rally via Facebook or Twitter.

32

million cases pending

in India’s judicial system.

1 in 3

Syrians

now needs urgent assistance.

370

political parties

contested India’s last national elections.

70%

of Egypt's labor force

works in the private sector.

70%

of oil consumed in the United States

is for the transportation sector.

20%

of Chechnya’s pre-1994 population

has fled to different parts of the world.

58%

of oil consumed in China

was from foreign sources in 2012.

$536

billion in goods and services

traded between the United States and China in 2012.

$100

billion in foreign investment and oil revenue

have been lost by Iran because of its nuclear program.

4700%

increase in China’s GDP per capita

between 1972 and today.

$11

billion have been spent

to complete the Bushehr nuclear reactor in Iran.

2%

of Iran’s electricity needs

is all the Bushehr nuclear reactor provides.

78

journalists

were imprisoned in Turkey as of August 2012 according to the OSCE.

Stay in the Know

Enter your email address to receive the latest Carnegie analysis in your inbox!

Personal Information
 
 
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
 
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036-2103 Phone: 202 483 7600 Fax: 202 483 1840
Please note...

You are leaving the website for the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy and entering a website for another of Carnegie's global centers.

请注意...

你将离开清华—卡内基中心网站,进入卡内基其他全球中心的网站。