Israeli ‘Blindness’ on Peace Can’t Last

Source: Getty
Op-Ed Chicago Sun-Times
Summary
The defacto annexation of the West Bank through settlements, along with declining secular Jewish births and the size of the non-Jewish population, means that Israel is en route to becoming a non-majority Jewish country.
Related Media and Tools
 

I was in Israel on a State Department-sponsored speaking tour, but every time I mentioned the peace process, I got eye rolls.From generals in Tel Aviv to college kids in Jerusalem, the response was the same: “We want peace, sure. But it won’t happen. You Americans are naive to even try.”

As Americans who love Israel, we need to change this thinking — fast.

Israel is sitting on a demographic time bomb. The defacto annexation of the West Bank through settlements, along with declining secular Jewish births and the size of the non-Jewish population, means that Israel is en route to becoming a non-majority Jewish country. Without a decision to divide into two states, Israel can’t be both a democracy and a Jewish homeland for long.

Israelis are hoping the problem disappears. With no solution, they sip espresso in Tel Aviv or surf off Haifa in a state of collective denial. Polling shows that they know this is escapism. But the nearly 70 percent of the population who say they want two states don’t believe it will happen, so are stuck in a state of frozen animation.

I first fell in love with Israel at the age of 16, and kept returning. In the second intifada, the school where I had studied Hebrew, the bus I took there, my coffee shop and the Mahene Yehuda market I visited daily were all hit by suicide bombs. Israel’s existence is not a given. Security threats are real. So what do we do?

First, we need to stop talking about the peace process. Not the concept — but the words, which strike Israelis as naive. Neutral terms like “negotiated agreement” resonate more than “peace” or “solution.”

Second, we need to prod both sides to seize the moment with urgency. Helping Israelis understand that America expects Israel to help itself is the best way to ensure an Israeli state for the next 65 years. That means, yes, stopping settlement building, while asking Europeans to pressure Palestinians to drop prisoner exchanges as preconditions for talks.

Third, we need to help younger Israelis and Palestinians feel that conflict can be solved. Palestinian groups are preventing young Jews and Arabs from attending joint activities — something European pressure might help stop. As long as anti-normalization continues, meetings with Northern Irish youth could show each side that intractable conflict can end.

Finally, negotiators need to talk with Palestinians who wield power — not just with those we like. That means engaging with Khaled Meshaal, Gaza’s prime minister, who has denounced negotiation. Such a stance means we must continue assisting Israel with security, like its Iron Dome system that has stopped 80 percent of incoming rockets.

Mid-week, I drove from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem on the controversial highway 443, which follows the wall. “Look,” said my driver. “That’s the wall the world makes such a fuss about.” She pointed to a fence that at times could have been guarding a south Chicago self-storage site. At other times, the fence was 20 feet high, covered with barbed concertina wire.

When I mentioned taking the road, many Israelis said they didn’t know they were driving along the West Bank or that the construction they saw was for settlements.

The blindness has consequences. One journalist explained, “We don’t see the Palestinians. They are behind their wall. They don’t affect all this,” he gestured around a lively Tel Aviv restaurant. “We’ll see them again if they launch another intifada.”

That is not the incentive system anyone wants. Israel has a chance, now, for a different future. Americans can catalyze change. But only the leaders of both peoples can seize it.

This article was originally published in the Chicago Sun-Times.

End of document

About the Democracy and Rule of Law Program

The Carnegie Democracy and Rule of Law Program rigorously examines the global state of democracy and the rule of law and international efforts to support their advance.

 

Comments (1)

 
 
  • HorowitzCSM1985
    The so-called demographic time bomb is a scary fiction advertised through the media by secular Jewish liberals in America and Israel to force some kind of immediate action in support of an independent west bank Palestinian state. While this strategy has achieved some success (splitting moderates in the Likud from religious zionists), the more lasting effect of the policy is to bring to power not the left but, instead, those same Likud moderates. Over the last seventeen years the Labor Party has only been in power for three short years. Prime Minister Barak championed the peace process in an historic negotiation with Arafat at Camp David in 2000. Arafat said no to a most far reaching deal and the Israeli public took notice. Thirteen years have passed since then, including another attempt at Annapolis in 2008 (Olmert's even more far reaching proposal) and the results have been the same. The Labor Party and the moderate secular camp in Likud have failed. Meanwhile, both peoples, Israelis and Palestinians have lost faith that a west bank Palestinian State is either desirable or possible. The Palestinians use this failure to libel Israel by calling her an Apartheid State (even though her occupation is legal under Article 6 of UN Security Council 242). The Israeli Left have only their glorious past, while the moderate secular center right have watched their political stars dim as the religious nationalists take an ascendant position. The far right has no problem with the so-called demographic time bomb. In fact, many are now calling for a one state solution (annex the west bank and make all Palestinians citizens). They would defuse the time bomb by Jewish and Christian Zionist immigration. While the Palestinians threatened a one state solution (in order to get a two state solution), the settlers and their allies are about to call their bluff. Where is the Israeli left's alternative to a dead two state solution? And where does this leave the Palestinian campaign to compare Israel to white South Africa before Mandela? In September, it will have been twenty long years since that electric moment on the White House lawn, when the world learned about Oslo. Demographic threats will not resuscitate a paradigm whose time has passed.
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
 
Source http://carnegieendowment.org/2013/06/20/israeli-blindness-on-peace-can-t-last/gbqk

Stay in the Know

Enter your email address to receive the latest Carnegie analysis in your inbox!

Personal Information
 
 
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
 
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036-2103 Phone: 202 483 7600 Fax: 202 483 1840
Please note...

You are leaving the website for the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy and entering a website for another of Carnegie's global centers.

请注意...

你将离开清华—卡内基中心网站,进入卡内基其他全球中心的网站。