U.S.-Russia Plutonium Disposition: Adventures With MOX

Summary
The single most costly U.S. nonproliferation program currently underway faces a cloudy future in Washington.
Related Media and Tools
 

The single most costly U.S. nonproliferation program currently underway faces a cloudy future in Washington. The Obama administration has proposed to halve planned spending for a U.S. plutonium disposition program that was crafted in negotiations with Russia and has been blessed by three U.S. presidents. 

The U.S. Department of Energy has begun studying alternatives, creating uncertainty about the future of a $7.7 billion nuclear fuel factory in South Carolina that lies at the U.S. end of the bargain. Lawmakers who wish to keep the project alive held up Ernest Moniz’s confirmation as energy secretary for a month and have threatened to block other nominations unless it proceeds.

The Carnegie Endowment’s Nuclear Policy Program will convene a special briefing and discussion on this controversial effort to reduce plutonium stockpiles. Panelists will discuss the program’s objectives and its difficulties, as well as options for minimizing plutonium that are now being explored. Speakers include Douglas Birch and R. Jeffrey Smith from the Center for Public Integrity, who have recently published four articles on this topic, Frank von Hippel of Princeton University, and Alan Hanson of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

R. Jeffrey Smith

R. Jeffrey Smith is the managing editor for the national security section at The Center for Public Integrity. Smith worked for 25 years in a series of key reporting and editorial roles at The Washington Post. In 2006, he won the Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting, along with two colleagues at the Post, for articles on House Majority Leader Tom DeLay and lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Smith wrote about defense, intelligence and foreign policy matters and arms proliferation, among other topics.

Douglas Birch

Douglas Birch is a writer for national security section at the Center for Public Integrity. Birch is a veteran foreign correspondent and has reported from more than 20 countries. He formerly served as the Moscow bureau chief for the Associated Press and spent 22 years at the Baltimore Sun. Birch was the Associated Press’s diplomatic and military editor in Washington, following his work in Moscow from 2001 to 2005 and from 2007 to 2010. At the Baltimore Sun, he was an enterprise, feature and science writer. 

Frank von Hippel

Frank von Hippel is a professor of public and international affairs at the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton University. Von Hippel was formerly the assistant director for national security in the White House Office of Science and Technology. Prior to coming to Princeton, he worked for ten years in the field of elementary-particle theoretical physics. His areas of policy research include nuclear arms control and nonproliferation, energy, and checks and balances in policymaking for technology.

Alan Hanson

Alan Hanson is the executive director of the International Nuclear Leadership Education Program at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He previously served as executive vice president of Technologies and Used Fuel Management at AREVA NC Inc. Hanson has more than thirty years of broad managerial, international, and engineering experience in the nuclear industry, most of which has been devoted to the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear waste management, and issues of nonproliferation.

About the Nuclear Policy Program

The Carnegie Nuclear Policy Program is an internationally acclaimed source of expertise and policy thinking on nuclear industry, nonproliferation, security, and disarmament. Its multinational staff stays at the forefront of nuclear policy issues in the United States, Russia, China, Northeast Asia, South Asia, and the Middle East.

 
Source carnegieendowment.org/2013/07/09/u.s.-russia-plutonium-disposition-misadventures-with-mox/gc1q

Comments (3)

 
 
  • hoz
    Please don't let me be misunderstood! The speakers are for sure respectable and competent in their areas, but I find it odd that there is not a single speaker with a background in nuclear engineering or technology! Do you think that this issue has no nuclear-wise technical aspects at all?
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
  • hoz
    With addition of the final (4th) speaker, now it seems OK, since you have at least one expert on the technical sides of the nuclear issues to be discussed.
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
  • sam
    I really need a ton of fissionable material for religious purposes.
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
 

Stay in the Know

Enter your email address to receive the latest Carnegie analysis in your inbox!

Personal Information
 
 
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
 
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036-2103 Phone: 202 483 7600 Fax: 202 483 1840
Please note...

You are leaving the website for the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy and entering a website for another of Carnegie's global centers.

请注意...

你将离开清华—卡内基中心网站,进入卡内基其他全球中心的网站。