Five Economic Priorities for Indonesia’s Next President

Source: Getty
Article
Summary
Indonesia faces tough economic challenges that could slow growth over the long term. The country’s next president needs to address these issues steadily and relentlessly.
Related Topics
Related Media and Tools
 

Indonesia’s economic performance is impressive. Over the past ten years, under the watch of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, growth has averaged 5.8 percent a year—well above the figure for the previous decade. Indonesia’s international reserves are a comfortable $93 billion, giving the country a buffer against possible economic shocks. The poverty rate has declined steadily. And, according to a recent United Nations survey, Indonesians consider themselves happier than the Turks, the Chinese, and even the Portuguese.

So, in October 2014, Yudhoyono will be handing over a basically healthy economy to his successor. But the next president will also inherit tough economic challenges that could slow growth over the long term. 
 
To galvanize support for economic reforms and ensure that growth does not slow and, if anything, that it accelerates, the next president should set the ambitious target that Indonesia become a high-income economy by 2035. This would mean raising per capita income above $12,600. Today, Indonesia’s per capita income is approximately $3,500. Increasing per capita income almost fourfold could happen in two decades if the country’s average annual growth rate stays in the 6.5–7.0 percent range. That is difficult but not impossible. After all, Indonesia’s growth averaged 7.8 percent a year in the three decades between 1968 and 1998. 
 
But the challenge of achieving such an ambitious growth target should not be underestimated. Indonesia needs both more investment in firms, farms, and factories and to invest in its people and its infrastructure. Ensuring that growth is sustainable and broadly shared also requires protecting the natural environment and giving everyone an equal shot at the “Indonesian dream.” Against this backdrop, there are five steps the next Indonesian president should take to build an economy that grows rapidly and sustainably.

Encourage the Growth of Manufacturing 

No developing economy has reached high-income status since 1950 without a strong manufacturing sector and a diversified production base. Manufacturing productivity in developing countries tends to catch up rapidly with that in advanced economies, and this makes manufacturing a powerful driver of growth. Unfortunately, the Indonesian economy remains reliant on the production and export of commodities, the prices of which are likely to be volatile. In fact, Indonesian manufacturing is shrinking as a share of GDP, exports, and employment. 

One reason for this shift is trade barriers—not tariffs or quotas at the border, which are discouraged by the World Trade Organization, but a growing number of behind-the-border barriers that impede trade, restrict competition, and depress investment. Some investment regulations make matters worse. For example, among 185 countries, Indonesia ranks 166 in the ease of starting a new business. And Indonesia’s labor laws place tight constraints on the dismissal of workers and impose one of the world’s highest severance payments. 

By protecting firms from international competition and hindering the movement of capital and labor between firms and sectors, these policies discourage labor-intensive manufacturing, dampen growth, and lock out the bulk of the Indonesian workforce from high-quality jobs in the most dynamic part of the economy—manufacturing. 

The next Indonesian president will need to reverse these policy directions. Indonesia needs higher investment, greater productive efficiency, and more employment. All three objectives can be achieved if Indonesia has an internationally competitive labor-intensive manufacturing sector—which, in turn, can be encouraged through streamlined investment regulations, increased domestic and international competition, and flexible labor markets.

Build Infrastructure 

Stay in Jakarta for a day and it becomes immediately apparent that inadequate infrastructure is choking productivity. Traffic congestion alone costs the capital city $1 billion in productivity each year. And infrastructure problems are not limited to Jakarta. A quarter of Indonesians across the country live without access to electricity, two-fifths lack basic sanitation, and half the roads are unpaved. As incomes rise, the demand for infrastructure is expected to soar. 

The government has many plans to build more infrastructure, but implementation has fallen persistently short. The next president will need to ensure the government consistently hits its infrastructure targets. This can be done by attracting private financing for infrastructure development through effective public-private partnerships and building skills within the government to manage the complex issues of risk sharing and risk management in infrastructure projects. The government must also vigorously implement the country’s new land-acquisition law, which is designed to reduce delays when building infrastructure by imposing time limits on different phases of the process and clarifying the rights and responsibilities of the different government agencies involved. 

Protect the Environment

Higher incomes have also increased pressures on Indonesia’s natural environment. With further growth, these pressures will only mount. Fish stocks are already declining. Shortages in safe drinking water are becoming acute. The demand for carbon-heavy fossil fuels is soaring. And the agricultural sector, which is expanding in response to rising demand for food, is contributing to deforestation and land degradation at an alarming rate. Unchecked, these trends will slow and eventually stall growth. Good economic policy must include good environmental policy.

The Yudhoyono administration has attempted to address this growing environmental crisis by introducing an impressive set of laws, policies, and programs and by decentralizing many aspects of environmental management and protection. But the next president will need to redouble those efforts because the gap between environmental goals and actual accomplishment continues to expand. 

Energy policy should be much more aggressive in eliminating fuel subsidies and stressing low-carbon alternative energy sources, including geothermal, hydroelectric, biomass, wind, and solar energy as well as unconventional gas. The price of natural resources more generally should reflect not only their scarcity but also their social and environmental costs. Public investment in agriculture should focus on increasing yields and higher-value crops while reducing waste and spoilage between the farm and the consumer. And the budget allocation for environmental protection and conservation programs needs to be increased further.

Reduce Inequality

As in other fast-growing Asian countries, income inequality in Indonesia has climbed in the last decade. A key reason is the rising inequality of opportunities to access healthcare, education, jobs, financing, and the justice system. Not only does this exacerbate social tensions as the poor see the rewards of growth accrue largely to the better off; it also wastes human potential by denying the poor avenues for upward economic and social mobility. 

The next president’s goal should be to ensure that all Indonesians have access to the same quality of government-financed health and education services. This access should be granted to everyone equally, whether the person is young or old; was born to poor parents or rich; resides in urban or rural surroundings; or lives on or off the island of Java, which is home to most Indonesians. Reducing inequality will require reexamining the distribution of fiscal resources across the country and determining how effectively they are used. And it will require expanding social assistance programs, improving their targeting, and increasing their efficacy through improved design and delivery.

Increase the Quality of Education

The experiences of developing economies that have achieved high-income status show how central education is to sustained and rapid growth. Indeed, Indonesia recognizes this too. The Indonesian constitution requires that at least a fifth of the national budget must be devoted to education. This policy has helped ensure that enrollment in primary and secondary education is almost universal in Indonesia and that 92 percent of adults are literate. But learning outcomes still compare poorly with other countries. In an international program to assess learning outcomes, for example, Indonesia ranked 56 out of 65 assessed countries. And despite growing numbers of graduates from Indonesia’s rapidly expanding tertiary education system, employers complain of a severe shortage of skills

Arguably, improving Indonesia’s education system should be the next president’s highest priority. Left unaddressed, the mounting shortage of skills will impede the growth of firms and companies and eventually of the economy.  The thrust of future education policy will need to emphasize quality, not quantity, by attracting the best possible teachers, increasing school budgets, tightening quality control, introducing peer review for academic research, building links between universities and international research networks, and focusing relentlessly on pedagogic outcomes at every level of the education system.

The Need for Steady Reform

Even when the next president’s policy priorities are reduced to five, it is clear that a steep road lies ahead. Indonesia is a large country with enormous potential, but it also confronts immense challenges. 

When Indonesians vote for their next president, they will need to choose a leader who has the vision and the skills to address these challenges steadily and relentlessly. The economic future of the country will depend on it.

End of document

About the Asia Program

The Carnegie Asia Program in Beijing and Washington provides clear and precise analysis to policy makers on the complex economic, security, and political developments in the Asia-Pacific region.

 

Comments (1)

 
 
  • Effendi Ibnoe
    Thank you, this article is so great, giving us energy & enthusiasm. However the key is on Relentless Execution....the discipline, and need a strong leader!
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
  • Report Abuse
Source http://carnegieendowment.org/2013/09/30/five-economic-priorities-for-indonesia-s-next-president/gomo

More from The Global Think Tank

In Fact

 

45%

of the Chinese general public

believe their country should share a global leadership role.

30%

of Indian parliamentarians

have criminal cases pending against them.

140

charter schools in the United States

are linked to Turkey’s Gülen movement.

2.5–5

thousand tons of chemical weapons

are in North Korea’s possession.

92%

of import tariffs

among Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru have been eliminated.

$2.34

trillion a year

is unaccounted for in official Chinese income statistics.

37%

of GDP in oil-exporting Arab countries

comes from the mining sector.

72%

of Europeans and Turks

are opposed to intervention in Syria.

90%

of Russian exports to China

are hydrocarbons; machinery accounts for less than 1%.

13%

of undiscovered oil

is in the Arctic.

17

U.S. government shutdowns

occurred between 1976 and 1996.

40%

of Ukrainians

want an “international economic union” with the EU.

120

million electric bicycles

are used in Chinese cities.

60–70%

of the world’s energy supply

is consumed by cities.

58%

of today’s oils

require unconventional extraction techniques.

67%

of the world's population

will reside in cities by 2050.

50%

of Syria’s population

is expected to be displaced by the end of 2013.

18%

of the U.S. economy

is consumed by healthcare.

81%

of Brazilian protesters

learned about a massive rally via Facebook or Twitter.

32

million cases pending

in India’s judicial system.

1 in 3

Syrians

now needs urgent assistance.

370

political parties

contested India’s last national elections.

70%

of Egypt's labor force

works in the private sector.

70%

of oil consumed in the United States

is for the transportation sector.

20%

of Chechnya’s pre-1994 population

has fled to different parts of the world.

58%

of oil consumed in China

was from foreign sources in 2012.

$536

billion in goods and services

traded between the United States and China in 2012.

$100

billion in foreign investment and oil revenue

have been lost by Iran because of its nuclear program.

4700%

increase in China’s GDP per capita

between 1972 and today.

$11

billion have been spent

to complete the Bushehr nuclear reactor in Iran.

2%

of Iran’s electricity needs

is all the Bushehr nuclear reactor provides.

78

journalists

were imprisoned in Turkey as of August 2012 according to the OSCE.

Stay in the Know

Enter your email address in the field below to receive the latest Carnegie analysis in your inbox!

Personal Information
 
 
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
 
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036-2103 Phone: 202 483 7600 Fax: 202 483 1840
Please note...

You are leaving the website for the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy and entering a website for another of Carnegie's global centers.

请注意...

你将离开清华—卡内基中心网站,进入卡内基其他全球中心的网站。