The Global Think Tank - Click here to learn more...

Leadership Initiative on Transportation Solvency

The U.S. highway trust fund is broke, unaccountable spending undermines long-term strategic priorities, and infrastructure is crumbling. Failure to reform the transportation system risks deepening U.S. dependence on oil, adding to climate change, and eroding economic competitiveness. Waiting to make real improvements only drives up future costs whereas responsible policies can improve transportation and reduce the national deficit today.

The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace has created a leadership initiative to develop a non-partisan solution funding a better transportation system in the United States. Former U.S. Senator Bill Bradley, former Pennsylvania Governor and Secretary for Homeland Security Tom Ridge, and former U.S. Comptroller General and now founder and CEO of the Comeback America Initiative David Walker led the initiative and recently released their landmark report, Road to Recovery: Transforming America's Transportation, detailing their recommendations for reforming and funding the federal transportation program

Resources
  The Basics on Transportation
  • Funds are raised through a combination of federal gasoline and excise taxes and then deposited into the Highway Trust Fund, which is used to maintain America's transportation infrastructure.
  • When Congress created the Interstate Highway System in 1956, it was meant to be self-sustaining.
  • The gas tax has remained unchanged since 1993 and at the same time transportation spending has continued to grow.
  • Today, there is an ever-widening gap between the amount of money flowing into the system and the amount being spent.
  • The Highway Trust Fund has to be bailed out year after year. Of the $78 billion spent annually on transportation, $25 billion comes out of the U.S. Treasury.
  The Problem with Transportation
  • Contributes to a fiscally unsustainable system: American transportation infrastructure is currently being paid for with borrowed money, further increasing our soaring national debt.
  • Maintains U.S. dependence on foreign oil: In 2010, the United States imported $323 billion of crude oil and petroleum byproducts. Americans have fewer incentives or alternatives to reduce gasoline consumption and thereby break our dependence on foreign oil.
  • Erodes America's economic competitiveness: As a share of GDP, Europe is investing twice as much in transportation and China is investing four times as much as the United States. Inadequate investment in transportation translates into higher costs for American business and slower, less reliable access to markets.
  • Delays repair of crumbling infrastructure: With funds in short supply, the United States must delay critical maintenance and improvements to America's roads, rails, and mass transit.
  • Exacerbates traffic congestion: America's transportation capacity simply isn't keeping pace with the growing number of travelers and trips, leading to increased wait times and lost productivity.
  OVERARCHING PRINCIPLES TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM
  • Adopt a consolidate-and-invest mentality: There are currently 108 federal transportation programs, many of which are outdated or duplicative. Overlapping programs should be merged and those that are no longer relevant should be eliminated.
  • Increase accountability: More than 80 percent of transportation funds are currently distributed by formula, rather than need or performance. Accountability should be increased by establishing metrics to ensure projects are cost-effective, necessary, and promote long-term economic growth.
Traffic
  THE SOLUTION TO INCREASE REVENUE AND REFORM TRANSPORTATION
  • Ban transportation earmarks: Earmarks are not subject to standard planning requirements, nor are they required to show their benefits outweigh their costs. Transportation earmarks represent an inefficient use of limited public dollars and ought to be eliminated.
  • Establish a National Infrastructure Bank: A National Infrastructure Bank, led by an independent board of directors, should be founded and charged with ensuring transportation projects meet national, not just parochial, objectives.
  • Adopt an oil security and price stabilization fee: As the world oil price rises, an ad valorem tax would be applied to oil imports and oil production. When the world price of oil declines, the fee would apply instead to retail sales of gasoline. Such a fee would simultaneously raise needed revenue for transportation infrastructure and exert a countercyclical effect on prices at the pump.
  THE BENEFITS OF TRANSPORTATION REFORM
  • Decreases the deficit: Pricing transportation carbon would make the Highway Trust Fund solvent, end the unsustainable practice of funding transportation improvements with borrowed money, and reduce the annual deficit.
  • Reduces U.S. dependence on foreign oil: Pricing transportation carbon would incentivize Americans to consume less fossil fuel, thereby reducing our dependence on foreign oil and enhancing our national security.
  • Stabilizes price of gasoline: With a countercyclical price-at-the-pump system, consumers and businesses will benefit from a relatively stable gas pricing structure that allows them to better plan for and manage expenses.
  • Supports long-term economic growth: By facilitating the movement of people, goods, and services, transportation infrastructure is an investment in long-term growth that will help keep America competitive in the twenty-first century.
  • Rebuilds American infrastructure: With sufficient revenue, the U.S. would have adequate funds to be able to create jobs to repair or replace our rapidly deteriorating roads, rails, and bridges.
  • Increases traffic efficiency: A reliable source of revenue would enable investments in greater capacity and the deployment of smart technology, reducing traffic congestion and improving the daily lives of millions of Americans.
  • Reduces carbon emissions: Pricing transportation carbon would help speed the adoption of cleaner, more efficient vehicles and alternative fuels, thereby helping mitigate climate change.
Source: carnegieendowment.org/transportation

Road to Recovery

Bill Bradley, Tom Ridge, and David Walker detail a non-partisan and politically feasible solution to fix America’s crumbling transportation system that will stabilize gas prices, finance America’s transportation infrastructure, and decrease the deficit.

Resources

Related Analysis
Leadership Team
  • Bill Bradley
    The Honorable William W. Bradley
    Former U.S. Senator
    Senator Bill Bradley is a managing director of Allen & Company LLC. Bradley served in the U.S. Senate from 1979 – 1997, representing the state of New Jersey. He was a senior advisor and vice chairman of the International Council of JP Morgan & Co., Inc. from 1997–1999. During that time, he also worked as an essayist for CBS evening news and was a visiting professor at Stanford University, University of Notre Dame, and the University of Maryland. From 2001–2004, he acted as chief outside advisor to McKinsey & Company’s nonprofit practice.
    •  
  • Tom Ridge
    The Honorable Thomas J. Ridge
    Former Pennsylvania Governor and Homeland Security Secretary
    Tom Ridge is president and CEO of the international consulting firm Ridge Global, headquartered in Washington, DC. He served as the nation’s first secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security from January 2003 through January 2005, and as the assistant to the president for Homeland Security from October 2001 through December 2002. Previously, he was governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania from 1995 through October 2001 and a member of the U.S. House of Representatives from 1983 through 1995.
    •  
  • David Walker
    The Honorable David M. Walker
    Former U.S. Comptroller General and now founder and CEO of the Comeback America Initiative
    Dave Walker is founder and CEO of the Comeback America Initiative. He also served as the seventh Comptroller General of the United States and head of the U.S. Government Accountability Office for almost ten years. This was one of his three presidential appointments each by different presidents from both major political parties during his 15 years of total federal service.
    •  
Staff
  • David Burwell
    David Burwell
    Director, Energy and Climate Program
    David Burwell is director of the Energy and Climate Program at the Carnegie Endowment. His work focuses on the intersection between energy, transportation and climate issues, and policies and practice reforms to reduce global dependence on fossil fuels.
    •  
  • Shin-pei Tsay
    Director, Leadership Initiative on Transportation Solvency
    Shin-pei Tsay is the director of the Leadership Initiative on Transportation Solvency. Prior to joining the Carnegie Endowment, she served as deputy director of Transportation Alternatives, one of the leading non-profit advocacy organizations in the United States, where she provided strategic direction and overall management of the staff and organization.
    •  
Contact the Initiative

  • Carnegie welcomes your comments and feedback on the initiative Email project staff directly at

    transportation@ceip.org
 

Carnegie Resources

Quotes on Carnegie - Praise for the Global Think Tank
“[Carnegie is]…one of the centers of gravity of thinking about national security matters in our country.” – General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
“Carnegie remains a first-rate source of policy analysis and practical guidance on all the major international issues and I rely on the advice and counsel of many Carnegie scholars.” – John McCain, U.S. Senator
“The Carnegie Endowment has been a training ground for many of the all-stars in the State Department….” – Madeleine Albright, Former Secretary of State
“I appreciate its work in the area of peace.” – Kofi Annan, Former Secretary-General of the United Nations
“I cannot think of a better alignment of communication, information, and getting people together.” – Eric Schmidt, Executive Chairman of Google
“The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is the #3 think tank in the world.” – University of Pennsylvania 2011 Global Think Tank Rankings
“[T]his great vision of becoming a global think tank [is] badly needed in an interconnected world.” – Nicholas Burns, Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs
“One of the most globally trusted talking-shops.” – The Economist
“The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is the #3 think tank in the United States.” – University of Pennsylvania 2011 Global Think Tank Rankings
“It is truly a global think tank…completely and appropriately reflective of the nature of the challenges that we face today.” – John Kerry, U.S. Senator
“A force for global peace and security for 100 years.” – John Brennan, Homeland Security Advisor
“An excellent institution that does important work to help establish stronger international laws and organizations.” – His Royal Highness Prince Turki Al-Faisal
“The Carnegie Moscow Center is the top think tank in Central and Eastern Europe.” – University of Pennsylvania 2011 Global Think Tank Rankings
“The Carnegie Endowment…has for a century been dedicated to understanding and preventing war and its myriad causes.” – Robert Gates, U.S. Secretary of Defense
“The Carnegie Endowment is known on both sides of the aisle with great deal of respect for your active international engagement….” – Michael Turner, U.S. Congressman
“[This event is]… a testament to the success that you’ve had in transforming Carnegie… into a truly global think tank.” – Leon Panetta, U.S. Secretary of Defense
“The Carnegie Middle East Center is the top think tank in the Middle East and North Africa.” – University of Pennsylvania 2011 Global Think Tank Rankings

From Carnegie's Global Network

Lebanon Edges Closer to Syrian Crisis

Paul Salem
Thursday, May 17, 2012

As armed clashes last weekend show, north Lebanon is becoming a growing support base for the Syrian revolution. Sunni mobilization in support of the uprising in Syria is mounting and the Lebanese government is losing its ability to maintain its policy of neutrality.

More from Carnegie Beirut Center

Future Challenges for U.S.-China Relations

Michael D. Swaine, Yan Xuetong, Paul Haenle, John Pomfret, Yuan Peng
Tuesday, April 17, 2012

The U.S. pivot to the Asia-Pacific has created both tension and opportunity in its relations with China.

More from Carnegie-TsingHua Center

The EU’s Plan B for Ukraine

Olga Shumylo-Tapiola
Monday, May 14, 2012

Ukraine Relations between Ukraine and the EU have reached their lowest point yet. It could be time for the EU to come up with a new plan.

More from Carnegie Brussels Center

What Should We Expect During Putin’s Third Term?

Mykola Siruk, Lilia Shevtsova
Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Putin has returned to the Kremlin, but he faces a significantly different Russia, because the country's situation has changed drastically. The previous Putin’s consensus between those in power and society has fallen apart.

More from Carnegie Moscow Center

Connect with Carnegie

Stay in the Know

Sign up for Carnegie announcements and publications—including Carnegie This Week—by filling out the form below. Note—fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.

Personal Information
 
Already subscribed? Manage Profile

    Enter your email address in the form below to receive an email with a link to your profile.
 
 
1779 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington, DC 20036-2103 Phone: 202 483 7600 Fax: 202 483 1840
© 2012 All Rights Reserved.