Narrow by
Use this menu to filter your search results. Check boxes below to return search results related to any combination of issue and regional interest.
Issues
Regions
Stay Connected to Sada Subscribe Sada is published in English and Arabic and available as articles are published or in a weekly digest.
Enter name and address (All fields are required)
Select Delivery
x
Palestine
 Print
 

Sada - Analysis

Photo Essay: Gaza’s Views on Reconciliation

عربي

  • Palestinians standing in Gaza’s Unknown Soldier Square call for a quick resolution to the ongoing reconciliation process between Hamas and Fatah. The demonstration was organized by unaffiliated Palestinians holding the Palestinian flag, not the flags of any political party. Photo by Mohammed Emad
  • Such groups came out to express their fear that current reconciliation efforts will fail if they are postponed. They called to end the Palestinian division now before deepening the crisis, which has affected regular Palestinians who suffered because of their political affiliation. Photo by Mohammed Emad
  • A local initiative named “The Palestinian Campaign to end the division between Hamas and Fatah” held signs urging political leaders to oppose political polarization and work together for the good of the Palestinian people. Photo by Mohammed Emad
  • Such scenes of Fatah and Hamas supporters together are rare. Palestinians are in need of such unity more than any time before. Photo by Mohammed Emad
  • Musa Abu Marzooq and Mahmoud Zahhar, two senior members of Hamas, meeting in Gaza days before the reconciliation efforts started with Fatah representatives. Many discussions took place among Hamas members regarding the reconciliation step and whether they will nominate Hamas leaders in unity elections or leave the political game to Fatah and other Palestinian political parties. Photo by Mohammed Emad
  • Hamas and Fatah leaders meet on May 26 in Gaza to work on different issues, including the formation of a unity government and the selection of its ministers. Photo by Mohammed Emad
  • Gaza’s streets, full of factional signs and words, have recently seen the spread of phrases encouraging reconciliation. The words above read, “Yes to the end of division.” Photo by Mohammed Emad
  • A group of young Palestinians in front of a souvenir shop showing Fatah, Hamas, and Egyptian flags. The last attempt at reconciliation between Hamas and Fatah was brokered by Egypt in 2012; this initiative did not succeed, but is considered a base for the current reconciliation efforts between the Palestinian parties. Photo by Mohammed Emad
  • Souvenir shops are marketing flags and posters that urge for national reconciliation. This one shows a combined photo of President Mahmoud Abbas and Gaza Prime Minister Ismail Haniya with the Dome of Rock behind. Photo by Mohammed Emad
  • There is a sense of concern overwhelming Gazans as they wait for the results of the current reconciliation effort, combined with fear that it will fail just like the Mecca, Doha, and Cairo unity agreements did. Photo by Mohammed Emad

Despite skepticism, Gazans are hopeful about the prospects of unity between Hamas and Fatah.

Regular Palestinians in Gaza received the news of the April 23 reconciliation agreement between Fatah and Hamas—known as the Beach (Shati’) agreement, signed in the Beach Refugee Camp in the house of Gazan Prime Minister Ismail Haniya—with a mix of skepticism and optimism. A formal announcement of a temporary technocratic cabinet is expected soon, to be followed by presidential and parliamentary elections in Gaza and the West Bank by the end of 2014. Gazans’ different views on this process reflect trepidation, as previous national unity efforts failed, but also hope in the strength unity might bring.

Since Hamas won the majority in the 2006 parliamentary election, Gazans have faced many hardships, including a blockade, two wars, and restrictions from Israeli and Egyptian sides. Israel began describing Gaza as a “hostile entity,” and Egypt cracked down on the tunnels in Rafah, only opening the border crossing occasionally for humanitarian purposes. For Majida, a resident of Gaza the unity agreement between Fatah and Hamas opens the possibility that past hardships will be resolved, “It was like a surprise or a dream that both parties will talk and stand together. … In 2007, we had a civil war. I remember I could not go out of my home because of the fighting in the streets. So many were killed because of that military dispute. Now having both parties shake hands and sign the Beach agreement is a glance of hope.”

In 2012, Hamas and the majority of Gazans saw hope in the Muslim Brotherhood’s victory in Egypt’s elections, expecting increased aid and the opening of tunnels and Egypt border crossings. That hope vanished after the military coup of 2013—and Hamas found itself again isolated and looking for support. Ibrahim, an aid worker said, “I believe that Hamas thinks of reconciliation as a final resort of its financial deficit and being isolated from the outside world. After losing the backup from the Muslim brotherhood in Egypt, they feel it’s time to return to the unity so strongly.” Through this unity agreement, Hamas hopes to cover its budget deficit and to pay government workers in Gaza; for the past few months they have only been able to pay their employees half their salaries. More broadly, Hamas is worried about its declining popularity among Gaza residents, as seen in the lessening number of supporters who take to the streets for party rallies or anniversary celebrations. The group hopes to avert a revolution among the disappointed Gazan population, which has waited seven years for Hamas to address their isolation and poverty, without result.

As for Fatah, unity provides a stronger position within the Palestinian government from which to consolidate their power and stem internal divides. For Mahmoud Abbas in particular, unity will allow him to isolate his internal rival Mohammed Dahlan, who is popular in Gaza, and his followers. More significantly, Abbas hopes that a unity government that nominally includes Hamas will be enough to convince Israel and the United States that it speaks on behalf of all Palestinians and compel them to put more efforts into the negotiations process. Mohammed, a 30-year old teacher, said that he feels optimistic: “Reconciliation is a concrete progress of the peace process.” He further made clear that Palestinians could not be strong advocates for the cause of Palestine unless they were united. However, Israel and the United States have indicated they will not accept at the negotiating table any unity government that includes Hamas—undermining Fatah’s primary reason for seeking unity in the first place. And if Hamas again wins parliamentary elections for a united Palestinian government, Gaza could again return to the 2006 situation in which their government will remain boycotted by most of the international community. Especially as Egypt and Saudi Arabia intensify their crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood, these countries may at the moment not accept an Islamist organization such as Hamas in power. And while Hamas survived this particular situation after 2006, it now lacks the resources to continue governing an isolated Gaza.

To secure international support, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas is trying to convince U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry to accept the mostly technocratic temporary government (which might be announced in the next few days), arguing that if Hamas is part of a unity government, it will have to play by the rules of the game. Abbas hopes American support will push Israel to accept a unity government as well, as opposed to isolating him for embracing Hamas. In a way to reassure the international community, he also declared that there is no contradiction between national unity and peace talks based on a two-state solution, seeing internal unity as necessary to forming an internationally legitimate Palestinian state consistent with the Arab Peace Initiative. 

Internally, Palestinian parties—including the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), Islamic Jihad, Al-Mustaqbal, and Third Way, among others—seem to agree that unity is a desirable goal, even if they remain divided over policy toward Israel. But despite optimism among Palestinian parties about the results of the unity agreement, the Palestinian street is skeptical, with good reason. Amal, a 27-year-old woman, emphasized the importance of having national reconciliation. “However, I doubt reconciliation efforts will pay off, as Hamas and Fatah don't take regular Palestinians seriously. Each party is only concerned for their own interest, not the Palestinians’ interest.” Gazans look at the extreme divides between Hamas and Fatah since 2006, both in their political approaches to the people and their different strategies in solving the Palestinian cause: Fatah with negotiations and Hamas with military “resistance.” Azzam, a social activist in Gaza, said: “it [national reconciliation] should not be only ink on papers between two parties having different political and ideological approaches. For seven years, the division has deepened and its implications were spread in every Palestinian home. It will take too long to have people reconcile and pave the way to a real civil settlement.” He added, “We had Cairo and Mecca unity agreements before, but they both failed. Practically, it’s too hard to have it done.” 

However, the political difficulties Hamas and Fatah face may be enough to force them into a unity government. Laila, a Palestinian woman, said, “Fatah and Hamas are in trouble now. Hamas suffers from the blockade on Gaza and Fatah feels it’s a blocked way with Israel with peace negotiations after over 20 years of achieving nothing. It’s not a matter of achieving a national goal; it is rather a matter of who is getting out of the factional problem.” For Fatah in particular, unity counters the Israeli view that negotiations are not worth pursuing because Palestinians are not united enough to implement any agreement. If this process does succeed, it will have to confront security issues, Hamas’s position toward Israel, among other divisive issues. 

Hatem Shurrab is a Palestinian writer and aid worker based in Gaza. He is currently a Leaders for Democracy Fellow at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University.

 
عربي

Comments (1)

 
 
  • Martin Edwin Andersen
    "Insanity," Albert Einstein is said to have remarked, is "Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." For an an out-of-the-box proposal for boxed-in negotiations, see “Common Lands, Common Ground: The indigenous agenda, Israel, Palestine and breaking the post-Oslo Peace Accords logjam.”
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
Source: http://carnegieendowment.org/sada/2014/05/28/photo-essay-gaza-s-views-on-reconciliation/hbtp

Twitter

Trending Topics

 

Stay Connected

Subscribe to Sada:
 
Subscription Options Sada is published in English and Arabic and available as articles are published or in a weekly digest.
Select Delivery
 
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 1779 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington, DC 20036-2103 P: 202.483.7600 F: 202.483.1840
Carnegie Middle East Center Emir Bechir Street, Lazarieh Tower Bldg. No. 2026 1210, 5th flr. Downtown Beirut P.O.Box 11-1061 Riad El Solh Lebanon P: +961 1 99 12 91 F: +961 1 99 15 91