For all the attention paid to the growing threats to nuclear forces, it may be their command-and-control systems that are more vulnerable. How serious are the threats posed by advanced nonnuclear capabilities, such as cyber, anti-satellite, and high-precision conventional weapons. How are these threats likely to evolve in the coming decades? Could unilateral strategies to reduce vulnerabilities, such as technical enhancements or attempts to deter nonnuclear attacks on command-and-control assets by threatening a nuclear response, be misinterpreted by potential adversaries as aggressive rather than defensive? Are there any plausible ways to manage these risks cooperatively?
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.