George Perkovich

Ken Olivier and Angela Nomellini Chair
Vice President for Studies
Perkovich works primarily on nuclear strategy and nonproliferation issues; cyberconflict; and new approaches to international public-private management of strategic technologies.
Education

PhD, University of Virginia
MA, Harvard University
BA, University of California at Santa Cruz 

Languages
  • English
  • French
  • Russian
Contact Information

Latest Analysis

    • Commentary

    The Diminishing Utility and Justice of Nuclear Deterrence

    • November 30, 2011
    • Thinking About Strategy

    Recent developments in international security that narrow the utility of nuclear weapons in deterring war may alter the role nuclear weapons play in the dialogue between the imperatives of war prevention and justness.

    • Research

    Reaffirming the European Model

    • October 06, 2011

    The greatest contribution Europe can make to strategic global affairs would be to reaffirm its singular model of a peaceful political, economic, and cultural integration.

    • Commentary

    Changing the Direction of U.S.-Pakistan Relations

    • September 19, 2011
    • Los Angeles Times

    The United States should reinvent its policy toward Pakistan to focus on helping the Pakistani population achieve higher living standards and improved governance rather than enabling the country’s security forces.

    • Commentary

    Stop Doing Harm in Pakistan

    • September 13, 2011

    U.S. policy toward Pakistan may have had the unintended effect of empowering Pakistan’s military and intelligence services at the expense of the country’s political future.

    • Commentary

    Stop Enabling Pakistan's Dangerous Dysfunction

    • September 06, 2011

    Because the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan means that Washington will be less dependent on Pakistani supply lines, it presents a rare opportunity to reconsider American policies and practices in Pakistan.

    • Commentary

    A Criteria-Based Approach to Nuclear Cooperation With Pakistan

    The Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan provides Beijing with an opportunity to pause and contemplate conditioning its nuclear cooperation with Pakistan on improvements in nuclear safety and security.

    • Commentary

    Alliance is Unstable, Not Pakistan's Nukes

    • May 16, 2011
    • Politico

    The debate over the security of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal is evidence of a growing gulf in trust between Pakistan and the United States. Rebuilding trust may require setting aside the nuclear security debate and working together on building Pakistan’s economy.

    • Commentary

    How to Reduce Pakistan's Leverage

    • May 10, 2011
    • New York Times

    Washington should act to end its reliance on the Pakistani security establishment so that it can more effectively promote civilian political and economic development in the country.

    • Commentary

    On the Future of Nuclear Diplomacy

    • May 06, 2011
    • Washington Post

    It remains to be seen whether a progressive international nuclear order can be built when states differ over which rules should be strengthened and how they should be enforced, and when some rulers reject the norms that others respect.

    • Research

    After Fukushima: Early Implications for Nuclear Industry and Policy Makers

    • March 15, 2011

    Amidst the drama of the worst seismic catastrophe in Japan’s recorded history, the Japanese government and its nuclear industry have been struggling to prevent a power reactor core melt accident similar to that which occurred at Three Mile Island in the United States three decades ago.

Please note...

You are leaving the website for the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy and entering a website for another of Carnegie's global centers.

请注意...

你将离开清华—卡内基中心网站,进入卡内基其他全球中心的网站。