George Perkovich

Ken Olivier and Angela Nomellini Chair
Vice President for Studies
Perkovich works primarily on nuclear strategy and nonproliferation issues; cyberconflict; and new approaches to international public-private management of strategic technologies.
Education

PhD, University of Virginia
MA, Harvard University
BA, University of California at Santa Cruz 

Languages
  • English
  • French
  • Russian
Contact Information

Latest Analysis

    • Commentary

    Uri Won't Lead India to Undertake Major Military Action

    • September 21, 2016
    • Rediff.com

    A terrorist attack in Uri has revived the possibility of an Indian military strike, possibly against terrorist camps across the Line of Control. Could this lead to nuclear conflict in the sub-continent?

    • Commentary

    Pakistan and India: The Art of Peace

    • September 19, 2016
    • Herald

    If India is pursuing covert operations to punish Pakistan, it would be a disturbing development in the nearly seventy-year security competition between the two states; but it should not come as a great surprise.

    • Commentary

    How India Can Motivate Pakistan to Prevent Cross-border Terrorism

    • July 28, 2016
    • Oxford University Press

    With a clear comparative advantage over Pakistan in economic clout and soft power, India can utilize a strategy for non-violent “compellence” to isolate Pakistan internationally, which could in turn motivate meaningful counterterrorism action within Pakistan.

    • Research

    The Iran Deal’s Building Blocks of a Better Nuclear Order

    • June 09, 2016

    The nuclear agreement with Iran includes innovations that could bolster confidence that other countries’ nuclear programs will be exclusively peaceful.

    • Commentary

    India’s Unresolvable Nuclear Debate

    • June 01, 2016
    • Wire

    A substantial gap exists between Indian offensive conventional military planning for Pakistan contingencies and its defensive nuclear policy that seeks to deter aggression with threat of massive retaliation.

    • Research

    India’s Nuclear Options and Escalation Dominance

    • May 19, 2016

    The growing prominence of nuclear weapons in Pakistan’s national security strategy casts a shadow of nuclear use over any potential military strategy India might consider to strike this balance. However, augmenting its nuclear options with tactical nuclear weapons is unlikely to bolster Indian deterrence in convincing ways.

    • Testimony

    Civil Nuclear Cooperation With Pakistan: Prospects and Consequences

    • December 08, 2015
    • House Committee on Foreign Affairs

    Although the governments of the United States and Pakistan are unlikely to agree on conditions to complete a nuclear cooperation agreement, the national, regional, and global interests that would be involved in pursuing such a deal are important enough to make even a hypothetical discussion worthwhile.

    • Commentary

    The Iran Deal: No Better Alternative, Now Make The Most Of It

    • September 28, 2015
    • The Institute of International Studies at the University of California, Berkeley

    The domestic debate over the Iran deal demonstrates politicians’ increasing aversion to compromise.

    • Research

    Parsing the Iran Deal

    • August 06, 2015

    An analysis of the Iran deal from a nonproliferation perspective.

    • Commentary

    Modi’s Strategic Choice: How to Respond to Terrorism from Pakistan

    • May 22, 2015
    • Washington Quarterly

    There are many ways to make Pakistani military leaders conclude that the cohesion, security, and progress of their own country will be further jeopardized if they fail to act vigorously to prevent terrorism against India.

Please note...

You are leaving the website for the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy and entering a website for another of Carnegie's global centers.

请注意...

你将离开清华—卡内基中心网站,进入卡内基其他全球中心的网站。