Karim Sadjadpour

Senior Fellow
Middle East Program
Karim Sadjadpour is a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where he focuses on Iran and U.S. foreign policy toward the Middle East.
Education

 

MA, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies
BA, University of Michigan 

 

Languages
  • English
  • Italian
  • Persian
  • Spanish

Latest Analysis

    • Commentary

    Iran's New Year Challenges

    • March 27, 2013
    • Council on Foreign Relations

    The Iranian leadership confronts a thicket of national and international challenges at the outset of the Persian New Year, or Nowruz, including an upcoming presidential election, simmering sectarian conflict in the region, and talks on its controversial nuclear program.

    • Commentary

    Syria’s Fate Hinges on Whom It Hates Most, U.S. or Iran?

    • February 05, 2013
    • Bloomberg

    Continued U.S. inaction in Syria risks leaving the country at the mercy of Iran and Sunni extremists—whose hatred of the United States dwarfs concerns they may have about Syrians’ well-being.

    • Research

    The Iranian Nuclear Threat

    • November 29, 2012

    With Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei still a formidable obstacle to any binding nuclear deal,the Obama administration should focus on motivating Iran to cap its nuclear development.

    • Commentary

    What if Israel Bombed Iran? The View From Washington

    • September 21, 2012
    • Washington Post

    For months, Israel has threatened to strike Iran’s nuclear sites. The United States has urged restraint. If such an operation were launched, how might Washington react?

    • Commentary

    Iran Will Be Central No Matter the Outcome

    • August 09, 2012
    • New York Times

    No country stands to lose more from the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria than its lone regional ally, the Islamic Republic of Iran.

    • Commentary

    Three Decades of Mistakes and Mistrust

    • July 30, 2012
    • New York Times

    In “The Twilight War,” government historian David Crist examines Washington's missed opportunities with Iran and the problematic fact that Iranians who want to talk to America can’t deliver, and those who can deliver don’t want to talk to America.

    • Commentary

    The Ayatollah Under the Bed(sheets)

    • April 23, 2012
    • Foreign Policy

    In essence, the Iranian regime's approach toward sex, like its philosophy of governance, is marked by expediency and used alternately as a tool of suppression, inducement, and incitement.

    • Commentary

    Iran’s Limited Escape Options

    • April 06, 2012
    • Washington Post

    The goal of coercive diplomacy should be to slow Iran’s nuclear progress and contain its political influence in the region until the regime is eventually transformed or changed through the weight of its internal contradictions and economic malaise.

    • Commentary

    The Revolution Turns 33

    • January 31, 2012
    • Iran Primer

    Thirty-three years after the revolution, under a reeling economy, the leaders of Iran are struggling to maintain the viability of the Islamic Republic and are increasingly turning to the military instead of the mosque to do so.

    • Commentary

    Ayatollah for a Day

    • November 10, 2011
    • Foreign Policy

    The strongest argument against an attack on Iran is that while it may set back Tehran's nuclear clock by two to three years, it would also likely resuscitate the fortunes of a deeply unpopular Iranian regime, prolonging its shelf life by another decade or generation.

Areas of Expertise

Please note...

You are leaving the website for the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy and entering a website for another of Carnegie's global centers.

请注意...

你将离开清华—卡内基中心网站,进入卡内基其他全球中心的网站。