James M. Acton

Jessica T. Mathews Chair
Co-director
Nuclear Policy Program
Acton holds the Jessica T. Mathews Chair and is co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Education

PhD, Theoretical Physics, Cambridge University

Languages
  • English
Contact Information

Latest Analysis

    • Commentary

    Apples, Honey, and Centrifuges: How to Talk to Your Jewish Grandmother About the Iran Deal

    • September 09, 2015
    • Tikkun

    With a little preparation, you can survive the conversation with bubbe about the Iran deal.

    • Commentary

    The Risks of a ‘Better Deal’ with Iran

    • August 30, 2015
    • National Interest

    If Congress prevents the United States from implementing its part of the deal, it would undercut not only Obama in attempting to a secure a better deal with Iran, but also any future president seeking to prevent proliferation through diplomacy.

    • Research

    Parsing the Iran Deal

    • August 06, 2015

    An analysis of the Iran deal from a nonproliferation perspective.

    • Commentary

    Iran Ain’t Gonna Sneak Out Under This Deal

    • July 16, 2015
    • Foreign Policy

    Under the terms agreed to in Vienna, the country is going to be crawling with inspectors. No one is covertly building a nuclear weapon under this regime.

    • Commentary

    Iran Needs to Come Clean With What, Not Why

    • June 25, 2015
    • Hill

    After 18 months of negotiations, one of the remaining challenges to reaching a nuclear deal with Iran is the extent to which Tehran must “come clean” about the history of its nuclear program and, in particular, about apparent efforts to design a nuclear weapon.

    • Testimony

    China’s Offensive Missile Forces

    • April 01, 2015
    • U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission

    The military threat posed by Chinese gliders, should they be deployed, will depend on their range and payload. While regional gliders and nuclear-armed gliders would reinforce the status quo, conventionally armed intercontinental gliders would create a qualitatively new threat.

    • Research

    The World in 2015

    Our take on the year ahead.

    • Commentary

    A New High-Speed Arms Race

    • November 21, 2014
    • Independent Military Review

    Clear evidence has recently emerged that a new arms race in ultra-fast, long-range weapons may be brewing between the United States, China, and Russia.

    • Commentary

    Who Cares about an Iranian Nuclear Breakout? Beware of an Atomic “Sneak-out”

    • November 04, 2014
    • National Interest

    Negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program are foundering on the question of how much enrichment capacity it can be permitted. It’s time for America to rethink its strategy for preventing Tehran from getting the Bomb.

    • Commentary

    Why Do We Need 'Hypersonic' Strike Weapons, Exactly?

    • September 17, 2014
    • Defense One

    It’s hard to dispute the notion that before spending billions of dollars on a new weapon, the Pentagon ought to be able to explain what it’s for. So it’s surprising how often this rule isn’t followed. Take the Advanced Hypersonic Weapon.

Please note...

You are leaving the website for the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy and entering a website for another of Carnegie's global centers.

请注意...

你将离开清华—卡内基中心网站,进入卡内基其他全球中心的网站。