INDIA - Foreign and Domestic Politics
Delhi Blasts - Legal Aid to Jamia Students
The Delhi police claimed that they shot the mastermind of the bomb blasts which rocked Delhi in September. Public perception that the Jamia Nagar encounter was faked is indicative of the government's lost credibility, argues Malvika Singh . She links the government's general fear of “rocking the boat” to the Jammu & Kashmir crisis, its refusal to counter parades led by Raj Thakeray, and the violence against Christians in Karnataka and Orissa. (The Telegraph, September 23, 2008 )
Recreating the events of the day, Praveen Swami rebuts the notion that the Jamia Nagar shootout was staged. (The Hindu, October 10, 2008 )
The Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) criticized Jamia Milia Islamia, a government-funded university, for offering legal aid to its students who are suspects in the investigation of Delhi bomb blasts. An editorial in the Hindu criticizes the BJP's position, arguing that offering legal aid does not equal moral justification for a heinous crime. The editorial also disputes the BJP claim that taxpayer money will be used for the defense. ( The Hindu, September 26, 2008 )
Ayesha Siddiqua thinks Mushirul Hasan, Jamia Milia's vice-chancellor, represents Gandhi's legacy better than most in modern India and argues that his actions soothed tensions in the university and the Jamia Nagar locality. ( Dawn, October 17, 2008 )
Meanwhile, Mayank Austen Soofi visits a hostel in Jamia and reports on the absurd ways students are trying to protect themselves from being targeted. ( Hindustan Times, September 29, 2008 )
Questioning what he terms ‘liberal perceptions of terrorism,” Swapan Dasgupta asserts that seeking socioeconomic causes rather than punishing perpetrators has led to absurd explanations of the attack on the Indian Parliament and the burning of the Godhra train. He points to the state's forceful handling of Sikh secessionism in the 1980s as an example to be followed today. Finally, he claims that Mushirul Hasan's defense of Jamia Milia students has led to victimization of the Muslim community. ( The Telegraph, October 3, 2008 )
Nuclear Deal: Finally Done 
The India-U.S. civil nuclear deal was approved this month by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Bush. The passage of the agreement has been credited in large part to the personal initiative of President Bush. Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh expressed his gratitude during a private dinner, proclaiming that “India loves Bush”. Indu Prakash Singh ascribes the sweeping statement to Singh's relative inexperience in foreign policy and argues that the idea that no other foreign leader has done as much for India is inaccurate. The absence of institutional memory of the Soviets' warm relationship with India is partly to blame. ( Daily Excelsior, October 9, 2008 )
An editorial in the Asian Age comments on the irony that France, and not the United States, was the first country to finalize and sign a nuclear commerce agreement with India. India's agreement with France contradicts claims by the Left that India will become a junior partner in American imperialism and puts to rest questions of infringed sovereignty being put forward by the BJP. ( Asian Age, October 3, 2008 )
The Indian government should have brought the final version of the nuclear deal before Parliament before signing it, asserts Brahma Chellaney . He accuses Singh of forgoing domestic political consensus on the agreement and reasons that this is primarily because the deal fails to legally guarantee fuel-supply assurance, reprocessing rights, permission to build strategic fuel reserves, and does not offer entitlement to corrective measures. ( Asian Age, September 25, 2008 )
The lack of subsidies for nuclear power will ensure competitive pricing, asserted S. K. Jain, chairman of Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL), in an interview with Business Standard . He conceded that NPCIL could not continue to be the only company authorized to make nuclear power plants in India and welcomed the idea of foreign sector competition, but with checks and balances. He also identified land acquisition for setting up plants as the biggest challenge for his company. ( Business Standard, October 10, 2008 )
The challenge of land acquisition for nuclear power plants poses a particular dilemma for Left-ruled West Bengal - a state in desperate need of industrial development but still reeling from the recent Tata decision to abandon its Nano project in the face of political opposition. Saubhadra Chatterjee writes that the Center would likely grant land to West Bengal, but an American company would build the plant, an anathema to Left parties who bitterly opposed the nuclear deal on grounds of mistrust of U.S. motives. ( Business Standard, October 15, 2008 )
Violence Against Christian Minorities
An editorial in the Telegraph chronicles the political and administrative delay between a mob's violent attack on missionaries and the rape of a nun in Kandhamal, and the action taken by the state government in Orissa.(The Telegraph, October 6, 2008)
Michael Pinto takes on the argument that the recent violence against Christians was provoked by aggressive conversion practices. He asserts that only use of force and fraud during religious conversion can be opposed legally and morally in India 's secular society. While acknowledging the difficulty of judging whether such means were used, he concludes that in the absence of objective and easily verifiable criteria there are obvious red lines which cannot be crossed. ( Times of India, October 8, 2008 )
The fragmented nature of Christian churches in India, absence of information sharing databases, and lack of lobbyists in the political establishment are the primary causes of the vulnerability of Christian missionaries in India. George Menezes insists that despite these shortcomings, a violent response is not an option for the Christian community. ( Hindustan Times, September 29, 2008 )
Singur - Tata Pulls Out 
An editorial in the Hindu denounces the Mamata Bannerjee-led coalition of political parties for opposing a final compromise package, offered by the West Bengal government to landowners holding out against the Tata project. The package offered compensation to sharecroppers and manual workers, and recognized the future increase in land value after industrialization. Bannerjee could have profitably claimed credit for the changes in the government's offer, which were the result of her successful negotiation, but reason eluded her; the people of West Bengal will respond by voting against her party. ( The Hindu, October 8, 2008 )
A Business Standard editorial seeks lessons from the Singur fiasco and concludes that the West Bengal government created all the right incentives for industry and landowners but a small minority of landowners blocked the project. In the future, companies like Tata should seek to minimize the land requirements for their projects, while the government should use wasteland, not agricultural land, for such a purpose. ( Business Standard, October 6, 2008 )
Bengalis oppose industrialization. Rudrangshu Mukherjee arrives at this sweeping conclusion on the basis of evidence from the past and present. He points to the absence of industrialization as a political platform for Communists and opposition leader Mamata Bannerjee for thirty years. Even when the Left reversed its stance in the 21 st century, the political culture of bandhs and rallies remained, dissuading any potential investors. Apart from the November protests against violence by Communist cadres, civil society has not raised its voice for industrialization. ( The Telegraph, October 5, 2008 )
Swapan Dasgupta makes a similar case but traces Bengali “rebelliousness and silly bravado” to their reaction when India 's capital was moved from Calcutta to Delhi 97 years back. He compares Bengali culture to Gujarat, where the Nano project has been moved, and argues that Chief Minister Narendra Modi's initiatives deserve credit for Gujarat 's civic culture. ( The Telegraph, October 17, 2008 )
India-Pakistan Relations
A Times of India editorial welcomes president Zardari's statement that India is not a threat to Pakistan and that militants in Kashmir are terrorists. It argues India , Pakistan , and Afghanistan should cooperate in the fight against terrorism, and that India should support the $100 billion bailout being planned by the Friends of Pakistan group. ( Times of India, October 7, 2008 )
Booker Prize for Aravind Adiga
Chennai born writer, Aravind Adiga won the Booker Prize for The White Tiger, his debut novel. In an interview with the Guardian, he talks about why he wrote a novel centered on the Indian poor, a socio-economic class he is far removed from. ( The Guardian, October 16, 2008 )
INDIA - Economics and Development
Financial Crisis - Where Now?
An editorial in the Business Standard argues that the Indian stock market has not reached its bottom despite the recent crash. Pointing out that only $9 billion of $105 billion FII-owned stocks have been sold in the current crisis, it asserts that the bear market will last well into 2009. The editorial also warns that real estate prices and corporate spending will have to drop significantly to reflect the wealth destruction currently taking place, and recommends banning short sales to stabilize the bear market. ( Business Standard, October 9, 2008 )
S Anklesariya Aiyer believes that even a 2 percent drop in growth will cause the Indian economy enormous pain. Recalling the 1990s, when a similar decrease led to a crash in manufacturing, decreased tax revenues and increased unemployment, he predicts bankruptcy of small companies, reversal in the boom sectors, and a decrease of the stock market index to below 10,000. ( Times of India, October 5, 2008 )
In another insightful article, he analyzes why microfinance institutions in India survived the global financial crisis and what they can teach Wall Street. ( Times of India, October 12, 2008 )
Back to the top
PAKISTAN
Zardari's U.S. Trip
The Marriott blasts were not Pakistan 's 9/11, asserts Mosharraf Zaidi . He argues that the claim, made by Zardari in a Boston Globe opinion editorial, was purely for an American audience. Though Pakistan remains shaken by the blasts, the response hardly matches the public outrage and determination 9/11 evoked. Zardari's comments only alienate him from the public legitimacy needed for continuing counter-insurgency operations. ( The News, October 20, 2008 )
Shireen M. Mazari accuses President Zardari of committing a series of blunders in his visit to the United States . She writes that his agreement to open up land trade across the Skardu-Kargil route and across the international border with India, without any quid pro quo , displays sheer naïveté. She also criticizes the president's readiness to normalize relations without any mention of conflict resolution in Kashmir . ( The News, October 20, 2008 )
The de-hyphenation of India and Pakistan in American eyes implies that U.S. aid to Pakistan will be absorbed by military forces to make them an efficient, well-trained, and well-equipped border militia. F.S. Aijazuddin writes that before demands for parity with India are made, Pakistan should consider the efficacy of its nuclear deterrence, which is monitored by a super-secret ECHELON monitoring system. ( Dawn, October 11, 2008 )
India–Pakistan Water Dispute
An editorial in Daily Mail makes the case that the Indian construction of Baglighar hydropower project over the river Chenab is illegal and a violation of the 1960 Water Treaty between India and Pakistan. It contends that the Indian position of the construction being a barrage and not a water storage facility is fallacious and the diversion of 200,000 cusecs of water present ecological and security problems for Pakistan. ( Daily Mail, October 12, 2008 )
Khurram Shahzad accuses India of hydrological warfare and exploiting Pakistan's agricultural dependence on water for geo-strategic objectives. He asserts that Pakistan needs to reduce its dependence by constructing more dams as a potential famine is more serious threat than India 's nuclear capability. ( Pakistan Observer, October 18, 2008 )
In the same vein, Ali Mohammad argues for rainwater harvesting, conservation, drip irrigation and desalination to increase the productive usage of water. ( Pakistan Observer, October 17, 2008 )
Counter-insurgency: Strategies and Tactics
Nothing is better for militant recruiters than bombing by foreign forces. Sayeed Hassan Khan and Kurt Jacobsen argue that if Pashtun moderate forces lose people to extremism, a de-facto Pashtun nation will arise. It further claims that even if withdrawal of U.S. forces leads to inevitable chaos, it is still desirable. The only countries which should be involved in a future peace settlement should be China, Iran, and Russia. ( Dawn, October 20, 2008 )
I.A. Rehman questions the premise of negotiations that militants are the only group with a stake in the tribal areas (FATA) and Frontier province. He argues that many people in tribal areas fear losing economic opportunities in the event of a merger with NWFP. Also, since religious parties of NWFP were defeated in recently concluded elections, it would be imprudent to bypass secular and tribal leaders in any negotiations. ( Dawn, October 16, 2008 )
Pakistan has adopted different counter-insurgency strategies in Bajaur and Swat, writes Nasim Zehra . He points to local support and tribes like Salarzai actively fighting the militants in Bajaur. In contrast, Swat locals are not natural fighters and the elected party, ANP, has promoted political engagement in the past. Now, there is greater consensus around use of force in the area; all trends indicate that local support for the militants is drying up. ( The News, October 1, 2008 )
A Pakistan Observer editorial wonders how any consensus on counter-insurgency strategy can emerge given the low attendance of elected leaders in parliament for an on-camera briefing on the ongoing military operations against terrorism. (Pakistan Observer, October 18, 2008)
Barack Obama has said that he would authorize military strikes against Pakistan if the United States had actionable intelligence on top al Qaeda operatives and the Pakistani government would not or could not act. Cyril Almeida highlights the danger of this policy, citing the Damadola strike the U.S. carried out in January 2006. After initially reporting that four key al-Qaeda operatives had been eliminated, the United States was forced to admit that the strike had failed. (Dawn, October 8, 2008)
A Bailout for Pakistan
Why did Pakistan 's “strong fundamentals and robust growth” story unravel within a year? Faisal Bari explains that previous growth was consumption-driven, fueled by foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows, accompanied by low employment elasticity, and concentrated in sectors where Pakistan did not have competitive advantages. He believes the short-tem solution is to raise $10 billion from abroad to ease the exchange rate crisis; in the medium term, Pakistan has to increase production, exports, and undertake long-shelved institutional reforms.(The Nation, October 20, 2008)
Shahid Javed Burki warns against the danger of banking on the Pakistani diaspora to shore up the economy. He believes that most workers' remittances are actually the investment of savings accumulated by wealthy elite outside the country. This source of money is sensitive to both recessions in Western economies and the investment climate in Pakistan. He thinks China and Middle East oil exporters are the best options for bailing out Pakistan. ( Dawn, October 21, 2008 )
Back to the top
BANGLADESH
Awami League to Contest Elections
A New Age editorial welcomes the Awami League's decision to contest the elections after accepting the Election Commission's prerequisite of internal democratization of political parties. ( New Age, October 12, 2008 )
The dialogue and negotiation process with political parties should not be secretive and drawn out, asserts Kamal Hussain , a senior parliamentarian, in an interview with Daily Times . He is also in favor of a national unity government after the elections. ( Daily Times, October 22, 2008
Destruction of Baul Statues
Shameran Abed bemoans the current regime's weakness in confronting Islamic bigots. Rather than confront their brand of religious politics, the government took down a monument dedicated to Lalon Fakir, a progressive poet and philosopher. Islamic bigots have escaped the regime's anti-corruption drive, led processions without fear of their being broken unlike other parties and have used violent means to silence freedom fighters. The tragedy is that mainstream political parties are not likely to reverse this trend even after democracy is restored. ( New Age, October 21, 2008 )
Ashfaq Wares Khan detects the return of a false choice between Bengali culture and Islam in the appeasement of Islamic bigots. He outlines the contradiction between the Election Commission insisting on secular constitutions even for Islamic parties and a constant acquiescence to Islamists despite their lack of numbers in parliament. An attack on inclusive baul philosophy and musical traditions is an indicator of bigger national threats. ( The Daily Star, October 20, 2008 )
Back to the top
NEPAL
Will the Real President Please Stand Up?
President Prachanda is a shrewd political operator who molds his personality to suit his audience, writes Aditya Adhikari. He has managed to appear as a rebel leader to the masses, conciliator to competitor political parties, liberal to Indian businessmen, and a revolutionary to foreign audiences. Adhikari believes that this indicates the absence of an ideological core and a lack of belief in the Marxist tenets he espouses. (The Kathmandu Post, October 14, 2008 )
N. P. Upadhyaya thinks Prachanda's proclivity to play to the gallery, especially abroad, reflects his desire to have good ties with both India and China. This is especially dangerous as it could intensify tensions between hardliner nationalists and pragmatists within his own party. (Telegraph Nepal, October 21, 2008 )
Politics of Development Aid
Foreign aid to Nepal is very Kathmandu-centric, said Robert Piper, United Nations (UN) Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator for Nepal . He also refuted the charge that the UN paid Maoists while they were engaged in armed struggle against the government. He opined that conflict in the Terai was not just a result of absence of development, but also a lack of conflict management systems. ( Kathmandu Post, October 17, 2008 )
Back to the top
SRI LANKA
LTTE, Ethnic Tamils and Indian politics
An editorial in the Sunday Leader examines the Indian government's options, when pressured by its Tamil Nadu ally, DMK, to intervene on behalf of ethnic Tamils in the war between the Sri Lankan army and LTTE . The newspaper believes that India can impose a no-fly zone and naval blockade to assuage the DMK and yet not send troops to Sri Lanka . ( The Sunday Leader, October 19, 2008 )
Kesara Abeywardena detects the desperation of LTTE in the DMK-created political storm in India. He believes that the fall of Kilinochhi – which displayed LTTE's ability to create a separate administrative body within the state of Sri Lanka – highlights the group's weakening. ( Daily Mirror, October 22, 2008 )
Sinhala Nationalism
General Fonseka is possibly the only serving military commander in the world who has applied for and taken residence in another country – the United States . The irony of a proud Sinhala chauvinist, dismissive of minorities, being accepted on a “diversity visa” is not lost on the editorial team of the Sunday Leader . ( The Sunday Leader, October 5, 2008 )
Back to the top |