REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

press release

Iran's Nuclear Challenge

published by
Carnegie
 on May 1, 2003

Source: Carnegie

For Immediate Release: May 1, 2003
Contact: Carmen MacDougall, (202) 939-2319, cmacdougall@ceip.org

Paper Urges United States To Take Action To Prevent Iranian Nuclear Proliferation
"Time is of the Essence," Writes George Perkovich

The removal of Saddam Hussein and a June deadline for an International Atomic Energy Agency report on the Iranian nuclear fuel-cycle program make it imperative for the United States to take steps to change Iran's calculations on acquiring nuclear weapons. In "Dealing with Iran's Nuclear Challenge," George Perkovich, vice president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, calls for the immediate convening of a Persian Gulf security dialogue, including the United States and Iran, to begin fashioning regional measures to reduce Iranian interest in possessing weapons of mass destruction.

Many observers believe that nonproliferation efforts have already failed in Iran. This pessimistic view is self-defeating and self-fulfilling, Perkovich suggests. The paper addresses the four major security threats that drive Iran's demand for nuclear weapons, then demonstrates that nationalism underlies its desire for the bomb. U.S. policy since the 1950s and especially recently, has fueled, rather than calmed Iranian nationalism.

The United States can take steps to integrate Iran into the international political economy, in return for Iran's eschewing nuclear weapons. For example, the United States could stop blocking Iran's entry into the World Trade Organization and remove sanctions and other inhibitions on U.S. investment and participation in natural gas pipeline routes. These policy changes would create an offer that Iranians from all factions would find difficult to refuse. This, in turn, would liberate Iranian progressives to engage with Americans.

"Even if it is only partially successful, the effort…will augment regional stability," Perkovich concludes. Depending on its findings, the IAEA report in June could intensify the drama over whether and how Iran, the United States, and the IAEA should respond to Iran's nuclear program. This drama "will be easier to manage if the Iranian people and competing leadership factions do not uniformly see the nuclear issue as part of a U.S. 'axis of evil' campaign, a predicate for possibly attacking Iran…. The U.S. should make some of the positive unilateral gestures...before a nuclear crisis erupts."

To read the paper, visit Carnegie's nonproliferation news and resources site, www.proliferationnews.org, and click on the link in the right column.

George Perkovich has worked on nuclear proliferation issues for 20 years. He has traveled to Iran twice, and interacted with Iranian analysts and officials on these issues since 1993. He wrote India's Nuclear Bomb, an award-winning history of India's nuclear weapon program.

###

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.