The collapse of the INF Treaty poses great challenges for Europe and NATO, forcing European capitals to conceptualize a new arms control framework.
Europe's lack of capabilities undercut Europe's ability to go alone in arms control with Russia, requiring a different approach to addressing the demise of the INF Treaty.
After Trump's withdrawal from the INF Treaty, Europeans should cooperate with East Asia to prevent a new arms race
Though some view the collapse of the INF Treaty as a sign of the end of arms control, there are several avenues that exist to preserve the arms control legacy of the treaty.
The increasingly blurred line between nuclear and conventional weapons heightens the danger of nuclear war.
The U.S. withdrawal from the INF Treaty poses significant implications for the future of European security, risking dangerous arms racing behavior among U.S., European, and Russian militaries.
It is not a good idea to mix nuclear and non-nuclear weapon systems. What are the risks, and why are countries still doing it?
Pakistan’s nuclear policy is heavily influenced by 1960s NATO flexible response strategy, and has essentially imported its contradictions into Islamabad’s own. This emulation has raised serious questions about Pakistan’s “full-spectrum deterrence” credibility, deterrence stability and future measures to manage regional security competition.
With emerging challenges for the U.S.-China nuclear relationship, the United States can take important steps to prevent further destabilization.
Nuclear command, control, communication, and intelligence (C3I) systems are becoming increasingly vulnerable to nonnuclear attack, presenting significant escalation and entanglement challenges.