Edition

NSG Issues New Global Rules for Sensitive Nuclear Trade

IN THIS ISSUE: Sensitive nuclear trade, China's plan to beat US, Congressman Turner on US strategic forces, Pakistan's steps to protect nukes, US-North Korea nuclear talks, US-India ties.

Published on July 28, 2011
 

New Global Rules for Sensitive Nuclear Trade

Mark Hibbs | Carnegie Nuclear Energy Brief

Jaitapur

The 46 members of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) agreed last month on new global terms of trade for uranium enrichment and spent fuel reprocessing technology (ENR). The new guidelines, published this week by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), represent a patchwork compromise between states most eager to prevent sensitive know-how from proliferating, and others which also fear discrimination by the handful of advanced countries that do nearly all the world's commercial nuclear fuel processing today.

The new guidelines impose additional and specific criteria for access to this technology at a time when more countries are planning to deploy nuclear power reactors and supporting infrastructure, and developing countries are objecting that advanced nuclear states are not assisting, and in some cases are impeding, their efforts. For over thirty years, the NSG has urged holders of sensitive nuclear fuel technology to "exercise restraint" in decisions about exports. The guidelines for ENR are found in two paragraphs—6 and 7—of the NSG's trade rules which were first published by the IAEA in 1978.

But until now this most important nuclear trade rule maker has imposed few specific extra conditions on sensitive nuclear commerce. In 2003, however, it was confirmed that an international smuggling ring had proliferated uranium enrichment technology to Iran, Libya, North Korea, and perhaps elsewhere. At the urging of President George W. Bush, the NSG then began a project to tighten its ENR guidelines. Full Article   



Follow the Nuclear Policy Program
RSS News Feed Twitter
Footer information begins here

More from Proliferation News


David Axe | Danger Room
China is militarily weaker than many people think, especially compared to America. This, despite lots of showy jet prototypes and plenty of other factory-fresh equipment. But Beijing has a brutally simple — if risky — plan to compensate for this relative weakness: buy missiles. And then, buy more of them. All kinds of missiles: short-range and long-range; land-based, air-launched and sea-launched; ballistic and cruise; guided and "dumb."     Full Article

 
 
Related
Getting STARTed (Carnegie Policy Outlook)
Carnegie Event
The 2012 National Defense Authorization Act recently passed by the House of Representatives includes several provisions affecting U.S. strategic nuclear policy. Congressman Michael Turner, chairman of the House Armed Services Strategic Forces Subcommittee, speaks on the House defense act and its relation to the New START agreement, further nuclear reductions, U.S. nuclear targeting strategy, missile defense, and non-strategic nuclear weapons in Europe.     Full Article

 
 
Anwar Iqbal | Dawn
Pakistan has in recent years taken a number of steps to increase international confidence in the security of its nuclear arsenal, says a congressional report released on Wednesday. In addition to overhauling nuclear command and control structures since September 11, 2001, Islamabad has implemented new personnel security programmes, the report notes. Both "US and Pakistani officials continue to express confidence in controls over Pakistan’s nuclear weapons," says the Congressional Research Service in the report it sent to Congress.     Full Article

 
 
Howard LaFranchi | Christian Science Monitor
The two-way talks the United States will hold with North Korea in New York later this week have the announced purpose of gauging Pyongyang's seriousness about resuming long-stalled negotiations on its nuclear-weapons program. But in announcing what she says will be an "exploratory meeting," Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton left unmentioned what may be the US’s primary motivation: a desire to head off any new military provocations by a regime that tends to lash out when it is feeling ignored.     Full Article

Sourabh Gupta | CSIS
Much has been written over the past decade about the promise of a transformed US-India strategic relationship, both globally and in Asia. From safeguarding the global commons to promoting the spread of democratic values to preventing the domination of Asia by a single power, this partnership of 'natural allies' is deemed to be 'indispensible' for stability and prosperity in the 21st century.     Full Article

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.