Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Follow Carnegie
- Search
- Global Resources
Global Centers
Languages
A regular survey of experts on matters relating to Middle Eastern and North African politics and security.
In an interview, Tamer Badawi discusses his recent article on relations between Iran and Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood.
The decision by the Trump administration to designate Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a foreign terrorist organization marks another dangerous step in the relentless campaign Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and National Security Advisor John Bolton are waging to provoke a U.S.-Iranian military conflict and topple the regime in Tehran.
U.S. partners forced by proximity to rub elbows with the IRGC might worry that unavoidable contacts could make them subject to U.S. sanctions.
America’s dealmaker-in-chief should shed his illusions of a grand bargain with Kim Jong Un and embrace the art of the possible. For clues, President Trump should look at the experience of the Iran nuclear agreement.
A regular survey of experts on matters relating to Middle Eastern and North African politics and security.
The notion that a muscular, unilateralist U.S. approach can produce the capitulation or implosion of this Iranian regime is an assumption untethered to history.
Though the Muslim Brotherhood and Iran share ideological commonalities and points of political convergence, several impediments stand in the way of deeper ties between them.
Zarif’s considerable diplomatic talents, coupled with his lack of authority, have meant that history will more likely remember him as more an enabler rather than a restrainer.
IranWire’s Natasha Schmidt discusses why Iran’s foreign minister Mohammed Javad Zarif may have thrown in the towel.
Stay connected to the Global Think Tank with Carnegie's smartphone app for Android and iOS devices