If the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood refuses to evolve and learn from its mistakes, it will squander any future opportunities to be an influential component of the Egyptian political spectrum.
In the wake of the June 30 popular uprising and the ouster of President Mohamed Morsi, a new political order is taking shape in Egypt.
In the aftermath of Morsi’s ouster, Muslim Brotherhood offshoots across the region seek to distance themselves from the “mother” organization—yet they all face the same fundamental challenges.
The polarization that marked Egyptian society in the past year and reached its peak before the June 30 demonstrations risks becoming the norm.
Egypt’s interim government promises to restore social peace, political stability, and create an economic roadmap amid a constitutional crisis and a growing tendency towards violence.
If there ever was a moment for India to stick by the principle of non-intervention in the internal affairs of other nations, this is it in the Middle East.
Egyptian political actors may gradually find ways to translate their seats at the table into real influence over outcomes, but it is difficult to see that process resulting in serious reform as long as political life is so polarized and atomized.
Despite the Egyptian military deposing the country’s elected President Mohamed Morsi, Egypt’s liberal movement has continued to back the military takeover and insist that it is not a coup.
Both Islamists and secularists are wrong if they think they can build a new Egypt on their own. There is no way the country can be successful if only one party rules.
The Obama administration has found itself confounded by semantics as the debate over whether to call the upheaval in Egypt a coup or not continues.











Stay connected to the Global Think Tank with Carnegie's smartphone app for Android and iOS devices