Egypt today is struggling with two opposing narratives, which are driving the country toward a civil war or a military takeover.
The army remains the power behind the scenes in today’s Egypt.
The U.S. government should refrain from doing anything that would suggest interference in Egypt’s internal developments and instead support a peaceful resolution by domestic civilian actors.
Mismanagement of Egypt’s transitional period has only exacerbated the challenges facing the country and prevented Egypt’s first civilian president from implementing any notable political reforms.
The greatest force to be overcome in governments and societies everywhere is inertia. Demonstrations are easy. Lasting change is hard.
Egypt’s Supreme Constitutional Court recently issued its verdict on the parliamentary elections law, ruling that not granting military personnel the right to vote would contravene the constitution.
Regardless of the outcome of the confrontation in Egypt on June 30, the nation’s deep structural problems will remain.
Tension has increased between supporters and opponents of President Morsi, with both threatening to stage mass protests on the one year anniversary of the president taking office.
Greater scrutiny should be given to how states such as Brazil, Egypt, Syria, and Thailand cooperate with the IAEA or support the nonproliferation regime more generally.
The private sector and the government, in collaboration with civil society organizations, must work together to avert an economic crisis and promote growth, stability, and the consolidation of democracy in Egypt.











Stay connected to the Global Think Tank with Carnegie's smartphone app for Android and iOS devices