Quick progress towards a new Egyptian constitution is extremely unlikely. This means that the new president's powers will most probably be modified after he is elected, a situation likely to create a new crisis.
The establishment of “inalienable” rights for all Egyptians is perhaps the most positive step for assisting the full political and social integration of Egypt’s sectarian minorities.
Young Coptic activists have been working to fundamentally alter the monopoly—and silence—the church’s hierarchy has imposed on the Orthodox community.
A number of longer-term trends engendered by the revolution that may gradually make the Egyptian state of the future very different from the one of the past half century.
An independent Egypt judiciary could provide for a more liberal and pluralistic order but also one that is less coherent and democratic than Egyptians currently realize.
Rather than provide military aid to Egypt and Tunisia, the US should focus on reforming the security sector.
Both the Egyptian government and the United States must keep in mind that the future of bilateral relations is much more important than the future of U.S. NGOs in Egypt.
If the Egyptian government has instigated the sudden crisis with the United States in anticipation of a domestic confrontation, then the worrying implication is that it is actively preparing to go on the offensive and trigger such a confrontation.
The newly elected (and recently assertive) legislature complicates the SCAF’s control over the constitutional process and its timing.
The revolution overthrew Mubarak, but not the military elite’s economic monopolies.











Stay connected to the Global Think Tank with Carnegie's smartphone app for Android and iOS devices