If Obama’s strategy to defeat the Islamic State is to work, the Saudis and Iranians must cooperate.
Qatar wants to increase its influence and break free from Saudi Arabia’s orbit. But its miscalculations and domestic and international challenges make that difficult.
The well-intentioned instincts of Barack Obama have run up against the harsh, complex realities of a Middle East in which no conflict has only two sides or a good outcome that doesn’t create new risks.
The killing of Ahrar al-Sham’s leadership will have major ripple effects in the opposition.
Although the Islamic State gained access to significant resources in Syria and Iraq, budgetary constraints will hinder the group’s expansionist aims.
Arab failed states allowed the Islamic State to grow and shamelessly used it for their own purposes long before anyone had ever heard of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
The success of any U.S. effort to establish an international coalition to counter the Islamic State will depend on whether Saudi Arabia and Iran can compromise.
The most effective way to tackle the Syrian refugee crisis is for neighboring states to assume a leading role in development spending, infrastructure upgrading, and job creation.
The Islamic State has ambitions in exporting its ideology outside the Middle East. What kind of threat does this pose to the global community?
Amid the turns for the worse in the Middle East, there are signs of hope.












Stay connected to the Global Think Tank with Carnegie's smartphone app for Android and iOS devices