Meeting the moment with AI will require a multifaceted approach with stakeholders from many sectors and disciplines. They will need to build a clear vision for larger and slower-moving global policy-centric projects to work alongside more focused and agile scientific efforts that meet pressing needs.

The lack of scientific consensus on AI’s risks and benefits has become a major stumbling block for regulation—not just at the state and national level, but internationally as well. 

Managing the risks of artificial intelligence will require international coordination among many actors with different interests, values, and perceptions.

But Paris first must hone its alternative vision.

Great powers around the world have entered a race for AI supremacy. In the EU, the United States, China, and India, policymakers are putting forward competing frameworks to regulate AI globally while trying to achieve technological superiority.

For the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act to set a global benchmark for AI regulation, the resulting standards need to balance detail and legal clarity with flexibility to adapt to the emerging technologies.

It shows that Washington is an active partner in regulating advanced AI systems.

Once the EU’s AI Act becomes law, the EU faces a long journey to successfully implementing it. We have a message for the artificial intelligence office that will likely be created to help along the way, as well as for others involved in the implementation process.

America’s AI policy has been—and likely will remain—a mosaic of individual agency approaches and narrow legislation rather than a centralized strategy.

It is understandable that the potential broadening of the scope of the EU’s AI Act’ makes the United States nervous. Washington should come to the EU with targeted suggestions, as its domestic conversation around AI risks matures.