The military value of Russia’s strike on Ukraine using the new Oreshnik missile was limited. The Kremlin’s real intent was to intimidate Europeans.
Maxim Starchak is an expert on Russian nuclear policy, strategic weapons, arms control, and defence and nuclear industry, as well as a fellow at the Centre for International and Defence Policy of the Queen’s University (Canada).
The military value of Russia’s strike on Ukraine using the new Oreshnik missile was limited. The Kremlin’s real intent was to intimidate Europeans.
Recent updates to Russia’s nuclear doctrine lower the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons, but Russia’s red lines are only really visible on the battlefield.
Russia’s nuclear development of the Arctic continues apace, but with the country cut off from regional cooperation initiatives and foreign funding, many worry it may struggle to respond to a nuclear emergency.
Many in Moscow believe that the system of arms control created during the Cold War was advantageous to the West—and they want that to change.
Despite all the hype, Russia’s nuclear modernization program is suffering from significant delays. The replacement of Soviet-era systems will take years because of production issues, poor management, and financial problems.
Russia doesn’t stand to gain anything from de-ratifying the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, but friends and foes alike will reap the benefits of its decision.
The Sarmat has been hailed as a game changer, but its development has been so rushed and plagued by delays that Moscow likely doesn’t know its exact capabilities.