Frederic Grare

Director and Senior Associate
South Asia Program
Grare is senior associate and director of Carnegie’s South Asia Program. His research focuses on security issues and democratization in India, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. Previously, he led the Asia bureau at the Directorate for Strategic Affairs in the French Ministry of Defense.
 

Education

PhD, Graduate Institute of International Studies
Advanced Degree, Paris Institut d’Etudes Politiques

Languages

English; French

 

 

Frederic Grare is senior associate and director of Carnegie’s South Asia Program. His research focuses on South Asian security issues and the search for a security architecture. He also works on India’s “Look East” policy, Afghanistan and Pakistan’s regional policies, and the tension between stability and democratization, including civil-military relations, in Pakistan.

Prior to joining Carnegie, Grare served as head of the Asia bureau at the Directorate for Strategic Affairs in the French Ministry of Defense. He also served at the French embassy in Pakistan and, from 1999 to 2003, as director of the Centre for Social Sciences and Humanities in New Delhi.

Grare has written extensively on security issues, Islamist movements, and sectarian conflict in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

 

  • Foreign and Security Policy in Post-Election Pakis
    Article May 14, 2013
    Foreign and Security Policy in Post-Election Pakistan

    After a decisive victory, the PML-N has a historic chance to consolidate democracy in Pakistan, but its relationship with the military is more ambivalent.

  •  
  • Op-Ed Indian Express May 7, 2013
    Wild Card in the Polls

    The younger generation in Pakistan may prove to be a decisive, if unpredictable, factor in the upcoming elections, with potentially serious consequences for the country's foreign policy.

  •  
  • Balochistan: The State Versus the Nation
    Paper April 11, 2013
    Balochistan: The State Versus the Nation

    Pakistan’s Balochistan province is descending into anarchy. Only a political agreement between the central government and the nationalist Baloch is likely to end the crisis.

  •  
  • Article April 4, 2013
    How Will Elections Impact Pakistan's Foreign Policy?

    Upcoming Pakistani elections are unlikely to fundamentally change the country’s foreign policies, but the next civilian government could be more cooperative.

  •  
  • Op-Ed East Asia Forum February 18, 2013
    Refusing to See the Obvious in Afghanistan

    Pakistan and Afghanistan should be encouraged to continue their renewed dialogue on regional security, even if their strategic convergence is limited at best.

  •  
  • Article January 30, 2013
    Is Pakistan’s Behavior Changing?

    Pakistan’s policy shifts are often signs of weakness, not strategic evolution. To encourage positive change, Islamabad should be left to face the consequences of its actions.

  •  
  • Global Ten November 29, 2012
    Avoiding Catastrophic Failure in Afghanistan

    Without substantive changes in the U.S. approach, Afghan government institutions are unlikely to survive the withdrawal of international forces.

  •  
  • Chinese soldier
    Article October 11, 2012
    Europe and Security in Asia

    Only if Europe is seen as a strategic player will it be able to contribute to Asia’s security in accordance with its own values.

  •  
  • Political Dimensions of Police Reform in Pakistan
    Policy Outlook July 14, 2010
    Political Dimensions of Police Reform in Pakistan

    Pakistan’s police force has historically been constrained by the military and intelligence agencies and often politicized as an instrument of repression. Reforming civilian security forces will diminish Islamabad’s dependence on the military and increase the legitimacy of the regime.

  •  
  • Is a Regional Strategy Viable in Afghanistan?
    Report May 6, 2010
    Is a Regional Strategy Viable in Afghanistan?

    President Obama has placed a greater emphasis on the need for a regional approach to Afghanistan. Leading experts analyze what a regional strategy would mean in practice through the eyes of key states, including Russia, Iran, Pakistan, and India, and what it could mean for U.S. policy.

  •  
Source: http://carnegieendowment.org/experts/index.cfm?fa=expert_view&expert_id=275

Areas of Expertise

Stay in the Know

Enter your email address in the field below to receive the latest Carnegie analysis in your inbox!

Personal Information
 
 
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
 
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036-2103 Phone: 202 483 7600 Fax: 202 483 1840
Please note...

You are leaving the website for the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy and entering a website for another of Carnegie's global centers.

请注意...

你将离开清华—卡内基中心网站,进入卡内基其他全球中心的网站。