Article
This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.
Vrinda Sahai
{
"authors": [
"Joseph Cheng",
"Dmitri Trenin"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [
"China’s Foreign Relations"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"China",
"Russia"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
China-Russia Relations, September, 6, 2013
The current state of the affairs between Russia and China is most positive in their history. This relationship is built primarily on an economic pragmatism.
Published on Sep 6, 2013
Source: China Radio International’s People In the Know
When Chinese President Xi Jinping went to Moscow in his first overseas visit after being elected China's president, it became quite clear that China-Russian relations are in high gear. The Chinese President is going to Russia again this week, attending the G20 Summit in St. Petersburg and meet with Russian President Putin on the sideline of the global event.
On the China Radio International, Carnegie Moscow Center’s Dmitri Trenin discussed Russia-China relations with Zheng Chenguang. He was joined by Joseph Cheng, chair professor of the department of political science at the City University of Hong Kong.Trenin said he is optimistic about the current state of the affairs between the two powers, which were described as most positive they've shared in their histories. According to Trenin, a relationship built primarily on an economic pragmatism has seen trade rise dramatically to $80 billion per year, and despite some uncertainties the two countries are expected to sign a major gas agreement improving Russia's access to Chinese markets and China's to Russian energy.
Trenin also discussed the extension of Sino-Russian cooperation into the military sphere. Joint exercises, such as the largest joint-naval event staged in the Sea of Japan this July, go a long way toward boosting confidence and trust between the two countries and their militaries. A military alliance, however, remains both unrealistic and unnecessary for both powers, Trenin said.
Despite the partnership-like relationship between Russia and China, Trenin stressed the continuing importance of Russia's investment in its own economic development and modernization given China's larger, growing, and more globally integrated economy. This reality will continue to contextual Russia-China relations and indeed developments in organizations such as the G20 or BRICS.
This interview was originally broadcast on China Radio International.
About the Authors
Joseph Cheng
Dmitri Trenin
Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center
Trenin was director of the Carnegie Moscow Center from 2008 to early 2022.
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie India
- Managing Divergence: India’s BRICS Presidency in 2026
- India–Africa Strategic Partnership: Challenges, Potential, and Possible PathwaysArticle
A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.
Rajiv Bhatia
- Emerging From the “Zombie State” of Trade Agreements: The India-EU FTACommentary
The India–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is shaping up to be one of the most consequential trade negotiations, both economically and strategically. But, what’s in the agreement, what’s missing, and what will determine its success in the years ahead
Vrinda Sahai, Nicolas Köhler-Suzuki
- India’s Press Note 3 Gamble: Opening the FDI Door to ChinaArticle
On March 10, 2026, India’s Union Cabinet approved amendments to Press Note 3, a regulation that mandated government approval on all foreign direct investment (FDI) from countries sharing a land border with India. This amendment raises questions primarily about whether its stated benefits will materialize and if the risks have been adequately weighed. This piece will address the same.
Konark Bhandari
- India and a Changing Global Order: Foreign Policy in the Trump 2.0 EraResearch
Trump 2.0 has unsettled India’s external environment—but has not overturned its foreign policy strategy, which continues to rely on diversification, hedging, and calibrated partnerships across a fractured order.
- +6
Milan Vaishnav, ed., Sameer Lalwani, Tanvi Madan, …
