Verifying Zero: Long-Term Aims, Short-Term Steps

{
  "authors": [
    "James M. Acton"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "NPP",
  "programs": [
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": [
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ]
}

Other

Verifying Zero: Long-Term Aims, Short-Term Steps

Nuclear-armed states and non-nuclear-weapon states alike can and should work together in the short term to overcome the technical challenges of verifying disarmament and help advance the longer-term goal of abolishing nuclear weapons.

By James M. Acton

Published on Jan 1, 2010

Source: UNODA Occasional Paper No. 18

Verifying nuclear disarmament poses an unprecedented technical challenge. There can never be certainty that nuclear-armed States have not retained militarily significant stockpiles of fissile material. In the short term, to help prevent these uncertainties from becoming a roadblock in the future, these steps could, inter alia, (a) collect and archive information about fissile material production; (b) place information about fissile material production and holdings in the public domain; (c) be more transparent about civilian nuclear materials; and (d) implement the proposed Fissile Material Control Initiative. On their part, non-nuclear-weapon states could be prepared to recognize these as meaningful steps towards disarmament.

About the Author

James M. Acton

Jessica T. Mathews Chair, Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program

Acton holds the Jessica T. Mathews Chair and is co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Recent Work

Other
Unpacking Trump’s National Security Strategy
- +18
  James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …
Commentary
Trump Has an Out on Nuclear Testing. He Should Take It.
- James M. Acton

Nuclear Policy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

Commentary
How Tehran Is Connecting the Ukraine Invasion to the Iran Deal
Both events also could force Washington to rethink or revive its Middle East partnerships.
Karim Sadjadpour
Commentary
Diwan
A Ticking Time-Bomb?
Disagreement between the United States and Iran over a revived nuclear accord may anchor volatile competition.
George Perkovich
Commentary
Diwan
What Does It Mean that European States Have Triggered the Dispute Resolution Mechanism in the Nuclear Deal With Iran?
A regular survey of experts on matters relating to Middle Eastern and North African politics and security.
Michael Young
Commentary
What Europe’s Dispute about Iran’s Nuclear Program Means
The British, French, and German foreign ministers have formally accused Iran of breaking the terms of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, a step that could lead to sanctions. Are the Europeans preparing to pull the plug?
Jarrett Blanc
Commentary
Scratching Erdogan’s Nuclear Itch
Although Turkey is not likely to pursue a nuclear weapons program, it is expanding its nuclear industry by partnering with Russia.
Mark Hibbs

More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

Commentary

How Tehran Is Connecting the Ukraine Invasion to the Iran Deal

Both events also could force Washington to rethink or revive its Middle East partnerships.

Karim Sadjadpour

Commentary

Diwan

A Ticking Time-Bomb?

Disagreement between the United States and Iran over a revived nuclear accord may anchor volatile competition.

George Perkovich

Commentary

Diwan

What Does It Mean that European States Have Triggered the Dispute Resolution Mechanism in the Nuclear Deal With Iran?

A regular survey of experts on matters relating to Middle Eastern and North African politics and security.

Michael Young

Commentary

What Europe’s Dispute about Iran’s Nuclear Program Means

The British, French, and German foreign ministers have formally accused Iran of breaking the terms of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, a step that could lead to sanctions. Are the Europeans preparing to pull the plug?

Jarrett Blanc

Commentary

Scratching Erdogan’s Nuclear Itch

Although Turkey is not likely to pursue a nuclear weapons program, it is expanding its nuclear industry by partnering with Russia.

Mark Hibbs