• Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Middle East logoCarnegie lettermark logo
LebanonIran
{
  "authors": [
    "Pierre Goldschmidt"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "NPP",
  "programs": [
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": [
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Other

Identifying the Right Skills and Expertise for the Challenges of the 21st Century: Where to Find Them? How to Retain Them?

The anticipated expansion of nuclear energy worldwide will raise considerable challenges not only for the nuclear industry, but for the IAEA. Much needs to be done to ensure that the IAEA is able to attract and retain the top quality professionals required to carry out the Agency's multiple missions.

Link Copied
By Pierre Goldschmidt
Published on Nov 5, 2010

Source: Remarks prepared for IAEA Safeguards Symposium

The anticipated expansion of nuclear energy worldwide will raise considerable challenges not only for the nuclear industry, but for IAEA member states and the Secretariat, in particular in the areas of nuclear safety, safeguards, and security. In addressing the IAEA November 2010 Symposium on International Safeguards in Vienna, Pierre Goldschmidt discusses the major safeguards challenges of the 21st century associated with the verification of an increasing number of complex nuclear facilities as well as new disarmament commitments.

Against this backdrop, the IAEA faces an incipient crisis in staffing. Much needs to be done to ensure that the IAEA is able to attract and retain top quality professionals required to carry out its multiple missions, particularly in highly technical specialties that are also in demand in the private sector.

In order to better attract and retain the needed specialists, it is necessary to reconsider both the IAEA’s so-called “rotation policy” of offering only three-year initial contracts (which may be extended to five or seven years, and only in limited cases for longer periods) and the Agency’s salary structure.

Pierre Goldschmidt recommends that the IAEA be allowed to offer any new staff the choice between the present contract system and the possibility to sign a contract similar to those offered in the private sector. In a nutshell, this would consist, after a one-year probation period, of offering a long-term contract (of undefined duration) with the understanding that the Agency would have the right to terminate the contract at any time as long as it provides a well-defined prior notice period and compensations at a level commensurate with the duration the staff has worked for the Agency. This would have the double advantage of allowing the Agency to retain those specialists who are performing well and the possibility of dismissing those who are underperforming.

The biggest problem in improving the IAEA safeguards system, Goldschmidt argues, will be overcoming the almost universal resistance to change, which requires full support of both the Director General and IAEA Member States.

About the Author

Pierre Goldschmidt

Former Nonresident Senior Associate, Nuclear Policy Program

Goldschmidt was a nonresident senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    A Realistic Approach Toward a Middle East Free of WMD

      Pierre Goldschmidt

  • Article
    Serious Deficiencies Exposed by Latest IAEA Safeguards Implementation Report

      Pierre Goldschmidt

Pierre Goldschmidt
Former Nonresident Senior Associate, Nuclear Policy Program
Pierre Goldschmidt
Nuclear Policy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

  • Commentary
    How Tehran Is Connecting the Ukraine Invasion to the Iran Deal

    Both events also could force Washington to rethink or revive its Middle East partnerships.

      Karim Sadjadpour

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    A Ticking Time-Bomb?

    Disagreement between the United States and Iran over a revived nuclear accord may anchor volatile competition.

      George Perkovich

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    What Does It Mean that European States Have Triggered the Dispute Resolution Mechanism in the Nuclear Deal With Iran?

    A regular survey of experts on matters relating to Middle Eastern and North African politics and security.

      Michael Young

  • Commentary
    What Europe’s Dispute about Iran’s Nuclear Program Means

    The British, French, and German foreign ministers have formally accused Iran of breaking the terms of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, a step that could lead to sanctions. Are the Europeans preparing to pull the plug?

      Jarrett Blanc

  • Commentary
    Scratching Erdogan’s Nuclear Itch

    Although Turkey is not likely to pursue a nuclear weapons program, it is expanding its nuclear industry by partnering with Russia.

      Mark Hibbs

Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Carnegie Middle East logo, white
  • Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.