Aaron David Miller, Karim Sadjadpour, Robin Wright
{
"authors": [
"Karim Sadjadpour"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [
"Arab Awakening"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Middle East",
"Iran"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform"
]
}Source: Getty
Why Iran Is Different From Egypt
Although the circumstances in Egypt and Iran are significantly different, protestors in Iran are being inspired by Egypt’s example and some of the Iranian opposition have begun to call for an end to the regime in Tehran.
Source: CNN
For the first time since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the narrative in the region is no longer that Arabs are being inspired by Iranian theocracy, but that Iranians are being inspired by Arab, specifically Egyptian, democracy, explained Carnegie’s Karim Sadjadpour on CNN. However, “Egypt and Iran have some significant differences”, noted Sadjadpour. In particular, Iran has a great deal of oil wealth that it can use to financially co-opt its disaffected citizens and to arm its shock troops. Further, suggests Sadjadpour, “anti-American regimes like Iran are less vulnerable than U.S.-allied autocracies because Iran doesn’t have to worry about a reaching a threshold of violence where the U.S. will pull its funding.”
In the immediate aftermath of the contested June 2009 presidential elections, protesters were calling for transparent elections. Two years later, inspired by the revolutions in the Middle East, some of the opposition is calling for the downfall of the regime. While many of the leaders of the opposition, members of the old guard, are simply calling for reforms to the system, Sadjadpour explained that the youth are calling for structural changes. Moving forward, the opposition must coalesce around a common goal. In the short term, “it is going to be very difficult to rid Iran of the regime because the regime has a lot to work with in terms of oil wealth and shock troops,” said Sadjadpour. Yet he argued that the future does not augur well for Islamic Republic as change continues to sweep the region.
About the Author
Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Karim Sadjadpour is a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where he focuses on Iran and U.S. foreign policy toward the Middle East.
- What’s Keeping the Iranian Regime in Power—for NowQ&A
- How Washington and Tehran Are Assessing Their Next StepsQ&A
Aaron David Miller, David Petraeus, Karim Sadjadpour
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
- Egypt’s Discrete Role in the Ceasefire with IranCommentary
Cairo’s efforts send a message to the United States and the region that it still has a place at the diplomatic table.
Angie Omar
- Realism and the Lebanon-Israel TalksCommentary
Beirut’s desire to break free from Iranian hegemony may push it into a situation where it has to accept Israel’s hegemony.
Michael Young
- The United States and Iran Have Agreed to a Two-Week CeasefireCommentary
Spot analysis from Carnegie scholars on events relating to the Middle East and North Africa.
Michael Young
- Hezbollah’s Wartime StrategyCommentary
The party’s objectives involve tying together the Lebanese and Iranian fronts, while surviving militarily and politically at home.
Mohamad Fawaz
- Iran Rewrites Its War StrategyCommentary
In an interview, Hamidreza Azizi discusses how Tehran has adapted in real time to the conflict with the United States and Israel.
Michael Young