United States, Japan, and the Future of Nuclear Weapons

Book

United States, Japan, and the Future of Nuclear Weapons

Published on Jan 1, 1995

Source: Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1995

After a year-long examination, a high-level study group of 12 American and 12 Japanese specialists presents a searching analysis of the key global and regional arms control and non-proliferation issues facing the U.S., Japan, and the international community. The central theme of the report is that proliferation can only be prevented if the existing nuclear powers accompany their non-proliferation efforts with parallel moves to reduce and eventually eliminate their nuclear weapons in accordance with Article Six of the Non-Proliferation Treaty.

The co-chairmen of the study group are William Clark, Jr., former Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, and Ryukichi Imai, former Japanese Ambassador to the U.N. Disarmament Conference. The report was prepared by study group member Selig S. Harrison, Director of the Endowment's Program on Japan's Role in International Security Affairs.

Nuclear Policy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

Commentary
How Tehran Is Connecting the Ukraine Invasion to the Iran Deal
Both events also could force Washington to rethink or revive its Middle East partnerships.
Karim Sadjadpour
Commentary
Diwan
A Ticking Time-Bomb?
Disagreement between the United States and Iran over a revived nuclear accord may anchor volatile competition.
George Perkovich
Commentary
Diwan
What Does It Mean that European States Have Triggered the Dispute Resolution Mechanism in the Nuclear Deal With Iran?
A regular survey of experts on matters relating to Middle Eastern and North African politics and security.
Michael Young
Commentary
What Europe’s Dispute about Iran’s Nuclear Program Means
The British, French, and German foreign ministers have formally accused Iran of breaking the terms of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, a step that could lead to sanctions. Are the Europeans preparing to pull the plug?
Jarrett Blanc
Commentary
Scratching Erdogan’s Nuclear Itch
Although Turkey is not likely to pursue a nuclear weapons program, it is expanding its nuclear industry by partnering with Russia.
Mark Hibbs

More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

Commentary

How Tehran Is Connecting the Ukraine Invasion to the Iran Deal

Both events also could force Washington to rethink or revive its Middle East partnerships.

Karim Sadjadpour

Commentary

Diwan

A Ticking Time-Bomb?

Disagreement between the United States and Iran over a revived nuclear accord may anchor volatile competition.

George Perkovich

Commentary

Diwan

What Does It Mean that European States Have Triggered the Dispute Resolution Mechanism in the Nuclear Deal With Iran?

A regular survey of experts on matters relating to Middle Eastern and North African politics and security.

Michael Young

Commentary

What Europe’s Dispute about Iran’s Nuclear Program Means

The British, French, and German foreign ministers have formally accused Iran of breaking the terms of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, a step that could lead to sanctions. Are the Europeans preparing to pull the plug?

Jarrett Blanc

Commentary

Scratching Erdogan’s Nuclear Itch

Although Turkey is not likely to pursue a nuclear weapons program, it is expanding its nuclear industry by partnering with Russia.

Mark Hibbs