Paper
Ms. Shanthi Kalathil, Mr. Taylor Boas
{
"authors": [
"Taylor Boas"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"China"
],
"topics": []
}
REQUIRED IMAGE
In The Media
China's Web of Faith
Published on May 1, 2001
Source: Carnegie
Reprinted with permission from Foreign Policy, May-June 2001.
Whether seen as a peaceful spiritual group or a dangerous cult, China's Falun Gong is an extensively wired faith. Government crackdowns have made it harder to use the Internet for organization within China, but elsewhere, Web sites help Falun Gong enlist support for its human rights campaign while recruiting and informing members worldwide.
Sect founder Li Hongzhi uses the Internet as his principal means of communicating with followers. Even if they can't access sites through government-controlled servers in China, people may receive Li's missives as e-mail attachments or smuggled documents. FalunDafa.org hosts the full text of all Li's writings and includes links to local chapters worldwide. Download videos to learn the group?s exercises and audio clips to play during practice. Easy access to such information has helped boost membership in Europe and North America.
FalunInfo.net represents the public relations face of Falun Gong. The site frames the movement in terms of human rights and freedom of religion?concepts with greater resonance in the West than Falun Gong's philosophical tenets, drawn largely from Buddhism and Taoism. The site features press releases and an extensive Western news archive.
While critics charge that FalunInfo.net is one-sided, China's efforts are as well: One of several anti-Falun Gong sites (www.mingjing.org.cn/ppflg/) features testimonials from "re-educated" practitioners and gruesome photos of the recent self-immolations in Tiananmen Square. Falun Gong responded by creating pages "Exposing the Crimes of Jiang Zemin" and charging that Chinese authorities orchestrated the burnings to defame the group.
About the Author
Mr. Taylor Boas
Former Project Associate
- Internet and State Control in Authoritarian Regimes: China, Cuba, and the Counterrevolution
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie China
- Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?Commentary
China’s banking crisis in the 2000s was resolved by transferring the costs to households through financial repression—a decision that recapitalized the banks while exacerbating the structural imbalances that continue to shape the Chinese economy today.
Michael Pettis
- Caught in the Middle: Chinese Biotech Firms’ Divergent Responses to U.S. SanctionsCommentary
Chinese biotech companies have been on the receiving end of U.S. economic coercion. Yet their responses have differed significantly because firm and state interests are not uniformly aligned. For Washington, treating all Chinese tech firms the same, irrespective of their actual interests, risks pushing them farther into Beijing’s corner.
Xue Gong
- Are Data Centers the Solution to China’s Renewables Excess Capacity?Commentary
China’s latest energy plan explicitly calls for integrating data centers into the electricity system, particularly connecting them to green energy. It appears Beijing wants to use compute as a source of domestic demand to absorb renewables excess capacity.
Damien Ma
- Trump and Xi Are Angling for Three Years of StabilityCommentary
But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.
Damien Ma
- China Sells Stability Amid American VolatilityCommentary
U.S. unpredictability has allowed China to capitalize on its positioning as the “responsible great power”. Paradoxically, the more China wins the perception game, the more likely expectations will rise for Beijing to deliver not just words but to demonstrate with its deeds.
Chong Ja Ian
