Malaysia’s chairmanship sought to fend off short-term challenges while laying the groundwork for minimizing ASEAN’s longer-term exposure to external stresses.
Elina Noor
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [],
"topics": []
}REQUIRED IMAGE
Source: Carnegie
For Immediate Release: April 11, 2003
Contact: Jayne Brady, 202-939-2372, jbrady@ceip.org
OR Carmen MacDougall, 202-939-2319, cmacdougall@ceip.org
Unilateral Nation-Building and Surrogate Regimes Spell Failure
Democratic nation-building is among the most ambitious and difficult of foreign policy undertakings for the United States, notes a new policy brief, "Lessons from the Past: The American Record in Nation-Building," by Carnegie Endowment Senior Associate Minxin Pei and Junior Fellow Sara Kasper. The policy brief gives an overview of U.S. attempts at nation-building-then analyzes the critical variables for success, based on the results.
The United States made 16 attempts at nation-building over the past century. But ten years after the departure of American forces, democracy was sustained in only four countries. Two of these followed total defeat and surrender (Japan and West Germany), and two were in tiny countries (Grenada and Panama).
The record also reveals that unilateral nation-building by the United States has an even lower success rate. Following American military intervention, targeted nations are usually governed by American-supported surrogate regimes or direct American administration. The use of interim surrogate regimes has produced a record of complete failure. No American-supported regime made the transition to democracy, and only one case of direct American administration (in Japan) succeeded in ushering-in democracy.
The policy brief concludes that in Iraq the Bush administration should support a multilateral reconstruction strategy centered on bolstering political legitimacy and economic burden-sharing under the auspices of the United Nations.
Minxin Pei, senior associate and codirector of the China Program, specializes in Chinese domestic politics. His research covers a range of subjects, including economic reform, U.S. relations with Asia, and democratization in developing countries.
Sara Kasper is a junior fellow in the China Program. She received her B.A. in politics from Messiah College in Pennsylvania.
The policy brief is available only on the web, in draft form at www.ceip.org/iraq.
# # #
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
Malaysia’s chairmanship sought to fend off short-term challenges while laying the groundwork for minimizing ASEAN’s longer-term exposure to external stresses.
Elina Noor
For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.
Elina Noor
ASEAN needs to determine how to balance perpetuating the benefits of technology cooperation with China while mitigating the risks of getting caught in the crosshairs of U.S.-China gamesmanship.
Elina Noor
Damien Ma is taking the helm as director of Carnegie China, the Carnegie Endowment’s East Asia-based research center.
In July 2025, Vietnam and China held their first joint army drill, a modest but symbolic move reflecting Hanoi’s strategic hedging amid U.S.–China rivalry.
Nguyễn Khắc Giang