• Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Eduardo Zepeda",
    "Sergei Soares",
    "Rafael Guerreiro Osório",
    "Fábio Veras Soares",
    "Marcelo Medeiros"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "South America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Conditional Cash Transfers in Brazil, Chile, and Mexico: Impacts Upon Inequality

Conditional Cash Tranfers have reduced inequality in three Latin American countries: Brazil, Mexico, and Chile. While they represent only a small share of total income, they have lead to a 21 percent drop in inequality in Brazil and Mexico, and to 15 percent reduction in Chile.

Link Copied
By Eduardo Zepeda, Sergei Soares, Rafael Guerreiro Osório, Fábio Veras Soares, Marcelo Medeiros
Published on Feb 1, 2009

Source: Estudios Economicos

In a new policy paper, Carnegie's Eduardo Zepeda and associates decompose changes in the Gini coefficient to investigate whether the Conditional Cash Tranfers (CCT) have had an inequality reducing effect in three Latin American countries: Brazil, Mexico and Chile. They conclude that CCT programs helped reducing inequality between the mid-1990s and the mid-2000s. The share of total income represented by the CCTs is very small, less than 1%. But as their targeting is outstanding, the equalizing impact of CCTs was responsible for about 21% of the fall in Brazilian and Mexican inequality figures.  In Chile, the effect was responsible for around 15% of the reduction.

Authors

Eduardo Zepeda
Former Senior Associate, Trade, Equity and Development Program
Eduardo Zepeda
Sergei Soares
Rafael Guerreiro Osório
International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
Fábio Veras Soares
International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
Marcelo Medeiros
EconomyNorth AmericaSouth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    How China’s Growth Model Determines Its Climate Performance

    Rather than climate ambitions, compatibility with investment and exports is why China supports both green and high-emission technologies.

      Mathias Larsen

  • Overproduction in China
    Commentary
    What’s New about Involution?

    “Involution” is a new word for an old problem, and without a very different set of policies to rein it in, it is a problem that is likely to persist.

      Michael Pettis

  • Commentary
    The Chinese Investment Riddle: What Cities Reveal

    While China's investment story seems contradictory from the outside, the real answers to Beijing's high-quality growth ambitions are hiding in plain sight across the nation's cities.

      Yuhan Zhang

  • Commentary
    Using China’s Central Government Balance Sheet to “Clean up” Local Government Debt Is a Bad Idea

    China's stimulus addiction cannot go on forever. Beijing still has policy space to clean up the country's massive debt issue, but time is running short.

      Michael Pettis

  • Image of Chinese Yuan
    Commentary
    Why China Should Revalue the Renminbi—And Why It Can’t Easily Do So

    A quick look at the complexities behind Beijing’s enduring Catch-22 situation with revaluing the Renminbi, despite advantages of a stronger currency.

      Michael Pettis

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.