• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Vikram Nehru"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Southeast Asia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

It’s Time Malaysia Liberalized Its Auto Sector

Malaysia’s National Automotive Policy is currently under review so the time is ripe for change. The objective should be to alter the incentive structure away from domestic market protection and toward increased competition.

Link Copied
By Vikram Nehru
Published on Mar 2, 2012

Source: Star

Last month, the Malaysian and South-East Asian media was all abuzz about the dramatic twists and turns surrounding the trial of (Datuk Seri) Anwar Ibrahim and the prospect of an early election in Malaysia.

Less noticed was an announcement by Khazanah that it had sold its 47.2% stake in Proton to conglomerate DRB-Hicom.

At first blush, this action appears to be another reformist measure by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, who is seeking to burnish his credentials ahead of the elections.

But to be genuinely reformist, it is imperative that this divestiture of a flagship state enterprise now be followed by fundamental policy reforms to rejuvenate Malaysia’s ailing automobile sector and to give a boost to growth. Without such reforms, Malaysia’s automobile sector will continue to be a drag on the rest of the economy.

The reality is that Malaysia’s automobile sector is protected from foreign competition by elaborately constructed barriers of tariffs, investment approval permits, differential excise taxes, subsidised credit, procurement arrangements and tax allowances.

Much of this is designed to protect Proton (and its domestic component suppliers), the brainchild of former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, and the spoiled child of his and subsequent administrations. Despite its substantial political, policy and financial support, Proton’s share of the growing Malaysian car market has been declining.

The company now uses only 45% of its capacity and is steadily losing ground to its domestic and international competitors.

Divesting Proton to a private company is a good first step. Its new owner will be able to build new partnerships with global brands that could apply the latest technologies and rejuvenate the company’s product line. But new partners will be unwilling to join forces with Proton unless the new owners are given a free hand in deciding where to source component supplies and whom to employ.

If the new company continues to operate under the existing regulatory framework, then there will be little incentive to upgrade technologically and improve efficiency, and the new owners would expect to continue to receive significant resource transfers from the state through generous financial, regulatory, and institutional treatment that Proton has enjoyed since its establishment.

So Proton’s divestment on its own will do little to stimulate Malaysia’s automobile industry, which has fallen further and further behind its neighbor, Thailand.

In the short term, the status quo may serve vested interests in Malaysia’s automobile industry and in the political establishment. But the past has shown that it will do nothing in the long term to make it more competitive internationally.

The brave political decision would be to do the right thing – follow Proton’s divestment with measures that allow all car manufacturers, domestic and foreign, to attract the finest talent, source the best components from the most efficient and reliable suppliers, and permit competition on a level playing field.

Not only will this help Proton attract the right partner and get the international technology it so desperately needs to become internationally competitive, it will also give Malaysia’s entire automotive sector a new lease on life by attracting foreign investment, encouraging production at economies of scale, and potentially becoming a production hub for serving the South-East Asian car market.

The economy will receive a big boost and the electorate will rightly view the move as serving the national interest and signaling a decisive break from the past.

Policymakers need only look as far as India and Thailand to see the benefits that liberalization of the automobile sector can bring.

Malaysia’s National Automotive Policy is currently under review so the time is ripe for change. The objective should be to alter the incentive structure away from domestic market protection and toward increased competition.

Then the sale of Proton to the private sector would be a useful first step in the opening up of Malaysia’s automobile sector, its re-integration into global supply chains, and would represent a significant down payment in Malaysia’s negotiations with Trans-Pacific Partnership countries.

This article was originally published in the Star.

About the Author

Vikram Nehru

Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Asia Program

Nehru was a nonresident senior fellow in the Carnegie Asia Program. An expert on development economics, growth, poverty reduction, debt sustainability, governance, and the performance and prospects of East Asia, his research focuses on the economic, political, and strategic issues confronting Asia, particularly Southeast Asia.

    Recent Work

  • In The Media
    Southeast Asia, the Redback, and Reality

      Vikram Nehru

  • In The Media
    Now Comes Aung San Suu Kyi’s True Test of Leadership

      Vikram Nehru

Vikram Nehru
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Asia Program
Vikram Nehru
EconomyTradeSoutheast Asia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    China Sells Stability Amid American Volatility

    U.S. unpredictability has allowed China to capitalize on its positioning as the “responsible great power”. Paradoxically, the more China wins the perception game, the more likely expectations will rise for Beijing to deliver not just words but to demonstrate with its deeds.

      Chong Ja Ian

  • Vietnam's Top Leader To Lam meets with young representatives from China and Vietnam participating in the "Red Study Tours" at the Great Hall of the People on April 15, 2026 in Beijing, China. T
    Commentary
    Why Vietnam Is Swinging in China’s Direction

    Hanoi and Beijing have long treated each other as distant cousins rather than comrades in arms. That might be changing as both sides draw closer to hedge against uncertainty and America’s erratic behavior.

      • Nguyen-khac-giang

      Nguyễn Khắc Giang

  • Xi walking into a room with people standing and applauding around him
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Xi Doctrine Zeros in on “High-Quality Development” for China’s Economic Future

    In the latest Five-Year Plan, the Chinese president cements the shift to an innovation-driven economy over a consumption-driven one.

      • Damien Ma

      Damien Ma

  • Commentary
    Malaysia’s Year as ASEAN Chair: Managing Disorder

    Malaysia’s chairmanship sought to fend off short-term challenges while laying the groundwork for minimizing ASEAN’s longer-term exposure to external stresses.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    When It Comes to Superpower Geopolitics, Malaysia Is Staunchly Nonpartisan

    For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.

      Elina Noor

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
Keck Seng Tower133 Cecil Street #10-01ASingapore, 069535Phone: +65 9650 7648
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.