• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "scholarSpotlight",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India",
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Military",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Scholar Spotlight

Executive Summary: Samudra Manthan: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Indo-Pacific

As China and India develop strategic interests beyond their territorial and regional waters, their naval footprints will grow, overlap, and generate the basis for potential conflict.

Link Copied
Published on Oct 24, 2012

As China and India globalize their economies and develop strategic interests beyond their territorial and regional waters, their naval footprints will grow, overlap, and generate the basis for potential conflict. While neither country is ready to supplant the United States as the dominant naval power in the Indo-Pacific, their growing rivalry promises to deepen security dilemmas in the region and alter the world’s maritime space.

Key Themes

  • The Chinese and Indian navies are transforming themselves from coastal defense forces into instruments of power projection.
  • China’s principal maritime preoccupations remain the western Pacific—reunifying Taiwan, defending Chinese territorial claims, and constraining the naval dominance of the United States. However, Beijing is beginning to push into the Indian Ocean to ensure access to overseas energy sources.
  • New Delhi is now starting to make regular naval forays into the Pacific Ocean, having proclaimed for decades that its strategic interests stretched only from Aden to Malacca, the two choke points to the Indian Ocean.
  • China seeks long-term access arrangements in the Indian Ocean and India is consolidating long-standing economic and security cooperation with Mauritius, Seychelles, Maldives, and Sri Lanka.
  • In the Arabian Sea, rivalry between China and India is muted by America’s overwhelming political and naval presence.
  • The Chinese and Indian navies are starting to explore bilateral confidence-building measures, including ship visits, port calls, joint exercises, and high-level naval exchanges.

Recommendations for Chinese and Indian Policymakers

  • Negotiate an ‘incidents at sea’ agreement. Borrowing from a successful pact between the American and Soviet navies, China and India should exchange information on encounters between their two navies and establish a joint committee to annually review incidents.
  • Pursue a maritime security dialogue. A substantive and open-ended dialogue between China and India on maritime and naval issues is imperative to reduce the potential for miscommunication and conflict.
  • Secure the commons. China and India should initiate a trilateral dialogue with the United States on potential cooperation in securing the maritime commons in the Indo-Pacific.




ABOUT THE AUTHOR: C. Raja Mohan heads the strategic studies program at the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi. He is a columnist on foreign affairs for one of India’s leading English dailies, Indian Express. Mohan is also a nonresident senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

SecurityMilitaryForeign PolicySouth AsiaIndiaEast AsiaChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    China Financial Markets
    Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?

    China’s banking crisis in the 2000s was resolved by transferring the costs to households through financial repression—a decision that recapitalized the banks while exacerbating the structural imbalances that continue to shape the Chinese economy today.

      Michael Pettis

  • Robot arm with disposable test tube virus sampling in laboratory
    Commentary
    Caught in the Middle: Chinese Biotech Firms’ Divergent Responses to U.S. Sanctions

    Chinese biotech companies have been on the receiving end of U.S. economic coercion. Yet their responses have differed significantly because firm and state interests are not uniformly aligned. For Washington, treating all Chinese tech firms the same, irrespective of their actual interests, risks pushing them farther into Beijing’s corner.

      Xue Gong

  • An aerial drone photo taken on June 4, 2026 shows a wind-photovoltaic power storage station of Huadian Inner Mongolia New Energy Co., Ltd. as part of the Horinger data center cluster green energy supply demonstration project, in Hohhot, north China's Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.
    Commentary
    Are Data Centers the Solution to China’s Renewables Excess Capacity?

    China’s latest energy plan explicitly calls for integrating data centers into the electricity system, particularly connecting them to green energy. It appears Beijing wants to use compute as a source of domestic demand to absorb renewables excess capacity.

      • Damien Ma

      Damien Ma

  • Commentary
    Emissary
    Trump and Xi Are Angling for Three Years of Stability

    But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.

      • Damien Ma

      Damien Ma

  • Commentary
    China Sells Stability Amid American Volatility

    U.S. unpredictability has allowed China to capitalize on its positioning as the “responsible great power”. Paradoxically, the more China wins the perception game, the more likely expectations will rise for Beijing to deliver not just words but to demonstrate with its deeds.

      Chong Ja Ian

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
Keck Seng Tower133 Cecil Street #10-01ASingapore, 069535Phone: +65 9650 7648
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.