• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
REQUIRED IMAGE
Book

Russia's Nuclear and Missile Complex: The Human Factor in Proliferation

Link Copied
Published on Mar 29, 2001

Additional Links

IntroductionPart I: The StudyMissile CitiesNuclear CitiesTable of Contents

Source: Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment For International Peace, 2001

Study Commissioned by the Non-Proliferation Project

A new study commissioned by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace provides the first detailed statistical glimpse inside the Russian nuclear and missile complexes. Authored by noted Russian social scientist Valentin Tikhonov, the report provides the results of extensive surveys performed in five Russian nuclear cities and three Russian missile enterprises, and paints the most complete picture yet available of the living and working conditions of Russia’s weapons experts. The results suggest an increasingly difficult situation, and illustrate the high potential that a significant percentage of Russia’s weapons experts might sell their services to would-be proliferators.

Cities surveyed for this report include the nuclear cities of Sarov, Snezhinsk, Seversk, Zarechniy, and Trekgorniy and the missile enterprises located in Miass, Votkinsk, and Korolev.

The report includes hundreds of statistics and facts on the working conditions of Russian nuclear and missile experts. Findings in the nuclear cities include:

  • More than 62% of employees earn less than $50 per month.
  • 58% of experts are forced to take 2nd jobs to earn money.
  • 89% of experts report a decline in living conditions since 1992.
  • 14% of experts would like to work outside of Russia.
  • 6% express interest in moving "any place at all."
  • One respondent stated "What does it matter, the main thing is that I should be paid money; after all, I will be working, not robbing or killing."

Findings in the missile enterprises include:

  • Between 40% -55% believe their salary is 2 to 3 times below what they should be paid.
  • 28% of surveyed experts are forced to take 2nd jobs to earn money.
  • 67% report a slight or severe decline in economic conditions since 1992
  • 25% of those surveyed would like to emigrate to another country and
  • 21% said they would work in the military complex of another country
Nuclear Policy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    Beyond the Putin-Kim Alliance: How Can the International Community Engage China to Contain Nuclear Risks Over the Korean Peninsula?

    Faced with an increase in strategic maneuvering by Moscow and Pyongyang, Beijing will not sit idly by and allow Putin and Kim to shape the security environment on its behalf.

      Tong Zhao

  • REQUIRED IMAGE
    Commentary
    Missile Defense and the Strategic Relationship among the United States, Russia, and China

    China views U.S. missile defense as posing a greater potential threat to China’s nuclear deterrent than other U.S. military capabilities.

      Tong Zhao, Dmitry Stefanovich

  • REQUIRED IMAGE
    Commentary
    About the P5 process, RevCon 2022, AUKUS and US-China Competition From The Chinese Side

    There are certainly other issues among other P5 countries, but the U.S.-China competition is so by far the most consequential great power rivalry in the international system, and it has very far-reaching geopolitical implications at and beyond the Pacific region.

      Tong Zhao

  • Commentary
    What’s Driving China’s Nuclear Buildup?

    Satellite data has revealed the construction of new nuclear missile silos in Gansu and Xinjiang in western China. How U.S. and Chinese experts interpret the buildup and the motivations behind it could greatly reshape their security relationship.

      Tong Zhao

  • Commentary
    To Reboot Arms Control, Start with Small Steps

    There are three guiding principles that can help make future arms control dialogues more successful.

      Andrey Baklitskiy, Alexandra Bell, Tong Zhao

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
Keck Seng Tower133 Cecil Street #10-01ASingapore, 069535Phone: +65 9650 7648
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.