• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Article

Crisis to Crisis

United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan warned in a major speech last week that “we cannot continue to lurch from crisis to crisis, until the [NPT] regime is buried beneath a cascade of nuclear proliferation.”

Link Copied
By Caterina Dutto
Published on Feb 7, 2006

United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan warned in a major speech last week that “we cannot continue to lurch from crisis to crisis, until the regime is buried beneath a cascade of nuclear proliferation.”

 

With global attention now focused on the specific case of Iran, the Secretary General noted that “twice last year, governments had the chance to strengthen the foundations of the NPT regime, by agreeing on more robust IAEA inspections; incentives and guarantees for countries to forgo the enrichment and reprocessing of fissile materials; and energetic steps to meet disarmament commitments. Both times, they failed. We cannot afford any more such squandered chances.”

 

Annan warned the audience gathered for the UN Association of the United Kingdom meeting in London on January 31 that we cannot take a piece-meal approach to proliferation. We cannot expect to prevent nuclear terrorism or stop nations from acquiring nuclear weapons if “those states that already have them increase their arsenals, or insist that such weapons are essential to their national security.” Other states, he said, “feel that they too must have them, for their security.”

 

An excerpt and a link to the full text of Secretary General’s speech are provided below.

 


 

Excerpt from speech of Secretary General Kofi Annan to the United Nations Association of the United Kingdom, January 31

 

The World Summit last September… took important steps forward...

 

[But], there are areas where world leaders failed to reach any agreement at all. The biggest disappointment, for me, was their failure to chart a way forward on disarmament and non-proliferation.

 

Can there be any threat more alarming, in today’s world, than that of a nuclear or biological weapon falling into the hands of terrorists, or being used by a State, as a result of some terrible misunderstanding or miscalculation?  The more States have such weapons, the greater the risk.  And, the more those States that already have them increase their arsenals, or insist that such weapons are essential to their national security, the more other States feel that they too must have them, for their security.

 

For 35 years the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty has been remarkably successful in protecting mankind from this danger.  But now, it faces a very serious challenge.

 

Today’s headlines concern Iran -- rightly so, for basic treaty obligations and commitments are at stake.  For signatories of the NPT, the right to develop nuclear energy is conditional, on the solemn obligation not to build or acquire nuclear weapons, and to comply with standards set and monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency.

 

But, when we step back from the headlines, it should be clear that we cannot continue to lurch from crisis to crisis, until the regime is buried beneath a cascade of nuclear proliferation.

 

Twice last year, Governments had the chance to strengthen the foundations of the NPT regime, by agreeing on more robust IAEA inspections; incentives and guarantees for countries to forgo the enrichment and reprocessing of fissile materials; and energetic steps to meet disarmament commitments.

 

Both times, they failed.  We cannot afford any more such squandered chances.

 

For the full text of the Secretary General's speech, click here.

About the Author

Caterina Dutto

Former Research Assistant

Caterina Dutto
Former Research Assistant
Nuclear Policy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    Beyond the Putin-Kim Alliance: How Can the International Community Engage China to Contain Nuclear Risks Over the Korean Peninsula?

    Faced with an increase in strategic maneuvering by Moscow and Pyongyang, Beijing will not sit idly by and allow Putin and Kim to shape the security environment on its behalf.

      Tong Zhao

  • REQUIRED IMAGE
    Commentary
    Missile Defense and the Strategic Relationship among the United States, Russia, and China

    China views U.S. missile defense as posing a greater potential threat to China’s nuclear deterrent than other U.S. military capabilities.

      Tong Zhao, Dmitry Stefanovich

  • REQUIRED IMAGE
    Commentary
    About the P5 process, RevCon 2022, AUKUS and US-China Competition From The Chinese Side

    There are certainly other issues among other P5 countries, but the U.S.-China competition is so by far the most consequential great power rivalry in the international system, and it has very far-reaching geopolitical implications at and beyond the Pacific region.

      Tong Zhao

  • Commentary
    What’s Driving China’s Nuclear Buildup?

    Satellite data has revealed the construction of new nuclear missile silos in Gansu and Xinjiang in western China. How U.S. and Chinese experts interpret the buildup and the motivations behind it could greatly reshape their security relationship.

      Tong Zhao

  • Commentary
    To Reboot Arms Control, Start with Small Steps

    There are three guiding principles that can help make future arms control dialogues more successful.

      Andrey Baklitskiy, Alexandra Bell, Tong Zhao

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
Keck Seng Tower133 Cecil Street #10-01ASingapore, 069535
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.