Commentary
Transactional relationships are stable but can be shallow.
- +1
Paul Haenle, Maha Yahya, Benjamin Ho, …
Research
Polarization and Autocratization
The lack of consensus on the definition and measurement of polarization continues to hamper generalized conclusions on the relationship between polarization and autocratization.
Published on May 13, 2024
About the Authors
Jennifer McCoy
Nonresident Scholar, Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program
Jennifer McCoy is a nonresident scholar in the Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program, where she focuses on political polarization and democratic resilience in the U.S. and around the world.
Murat Somer
Murat Somer is a professor of political science at Koç University in Istanbul and an expert on political polarization, religious and secular politics, ethnic conflict, autocratization, and democratization in Turkey and around the world.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie China
- China’s Rising Influence in the Middle East
- The Many “One Chinas”: Multiple Approaches to Taiwan and ChinaArticle
Beijing says that over 180 countries accept its “one China principle” regarding Taiwan, but the reality is more complicated.
Chong Ja Ian
- China’s Zero COVID Policy Is a Double-Edged SwordCommentary
Beijing must choose between preserving its pandemic narrative or facing more unrest.
Paul Haenle
- What the Russian War in Ukraine Means for the Middle EastCommentary
It’s about managing oil prices, bread prices, and strategic partnerships.
- +8
Amr Hamzawy, Karim Sadjadpour, Aaron David Miller, …
- Why U.S.-China Relations Are Locked in a StalemateCommentary
Three months after the Biden-Xi summit, the two sides’ divergent framings of the bilateral relationship are hindering progress.
Paul Haenle, Sam Bresnick
