• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
AI
{
  "authors": [
    "Albert Keidel"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Why Buy U.S. Debt?

In light of the Obama administration's forecast that the government will borrow $3.7 trillion in the next two years, there are growing concerns over the willingness and ability of global investors to finance American debt.

Link Copied
By Dr. Albert Keidel
Published on Mar 4, 2009

Source: Diane Rehm Show

The Obama administration's recent budget forecast calls for the federal government to borrow $3.7 trillion in the next two years—prompting growing concerns over the willingness and ability of global investors, especially China, to finance the burgeoning debt of the United States.  To discuss those concerns, Albert Keidel joined Robert Hormats, vice chairman of Goldman Sachs, International, and John B. Taylor, professor of economics at Stanford University, on WAMU’s The Diane Rehm Show.  

Keidel noted that several years ago the dollar weakened relative to other currencies because other economies seemed reasonably healthy.  With the  rapid decline in the global economy, investors now recognize that the dollar is the safest currency in uncertain times.  Despite short-term difficulties, he noted, the U.S. economy is still the largest and most sophisticated in the world, and its government has a long track record of responsible financial and fiscal policies to avoid the kind of inflation that damages investor confidence.  Hence, foreign and domestic investors have increased their purchases of U.S. dollar denominated instruments, especially U.S. Treasury bonds.  

History suggests that the only effective time to reduce a country’s debt is during a period of healthy economic growth, as the United States did in the late 1990s.  If, as many experts argue, today's recession is worse than a common “every-ten-year” decline, Keidel explains that reducing budget deficits by constraining spending would be a misplaced priority.  In such circumstances, failure to spend smartly and decisively to turn around the global economy will amount to "inter-generational theft."  Cutting deficits now and failing to achieve a lasting recovery would burden the next generation with years of stagnant growth, unpaid debt, and reduced opportunities.

About the Author

Dr. Albert Keidel

Former Senior Associate, China Program

Keidel served as acting director and deputy director for the Office of East Asian Nations at the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Before joining Treasury in 2001, he covered economic trends, system reforms, poverty, and country risk as a senior economist in the World Bank office in Beijing.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    As China's Exports Drop, Can Domestic Demand Drive Growth?

      Dr. Albert Keidel

  • Article
    China’s Fourth Quarter 2008 Statistical Record

      Dr. Albert Keidel

Dr. Albert Keidel
Former Senior Associate, China Program
Albert Keidel
EconomyForeign PolicyNorth AmericaUnited StatesEast AsiaChina

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Commentary
    AI in Outer Space: Opportunities, Risks, and the Governance Gap

    How is AI reshaping space security, creating governance challenges, and where does international diplomacy stand today?

      Tejas Bharadwaj, Almudena Azcárate Ortega

  • Paper
    Threading the Needle: India’s Path Forward with China

    After the chill in ties between 2020 and 2024 that brought India–China relations to their lowest point in several decades, the two countries have engaged each other afresh. This paper argues that there are predominantly four imperatives guiding India’s approach to China, and they exist in an order of priority.

      Saheb Singh Chadha

  • Article
    Managing Divergence: India’s BRICS Presidency in 2026

    This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Article
    India–Africa Strategic Partnership: Challenges, Potential, and Possible Pathways

    A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.

      Rajiv Bhatia

  • Commentary
    The Unresolved Challenges in U.S.–India Semiconductor Cooperation

    The U.S.–India semiconductor cooperation story is well-stocked with top-level strategic intent. What remains unresolved, however, are some underlying challenges that will determine whether the cooperation actually functions. Three such friction points stand out.

      Shruti Mittal

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.