Sinan Ülgen
{
"authors": [
"Sinan Ülgen"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [
"Turkey’s Transformation"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Middle East",
"Europe",
"Türkiye",
"Levant",
"Western Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy",
"EU",
"Economy"
]
}Source: Getty
Turkey, a Silver Lining of the Crisis
The crisis in the eurozone may prove a blessing in disguise for Turkey, given its strong economic performance over the past years, and could even revitalize Turkey’s prospects for membership in the European Union.
Source: European Voice

Turkey's economy relies heavily on the EU – almost half of its exports are destined for, and three-quarters of foreign direct investment originates from EU countries – and yet its economy is growing strongly. Turkey bounced back quickly from the economic contraction of 2009 (when the economy shrank by 4.7%), with growth reaching double digits in the first quarter of 2010.
The resilience of the Turkish economy can be explained by three factors: fiscal austerity, an under-leveraged economy, and a robust banking industry. Following the economic crisis of 2000-01, it undertook a set of austerity reforms led by the International Monetary Fund. Within a few years, it began recording large budget surpluses. In addition, its public debt dropped significantly, from a high of 98% of gross domestic product in 2001 to 40% in 2008. When the global conditions worsened, it responded with a strong fiscal stimulus and yet its primary budget remained in balance and its public debt stabilised at 46%.
A conservative approach to banking regulation and consumer finance has also allowed Turkey to weather the storm created by the eurozone crisis. Strong regulatory oversight in the banking sector in the aftermath of the 2001 crisis effectively eliminated the risk from toxic assets and non-performing loans. Moreover, the banking system is not heavily dependent on foreign funding, relying instead on its domestic depositors to provide funding for its loan activities.
The crucial question, however, is whether Turkey can continue this strong performance if the eurozone fails to recover. Given Turkey's heavy reliance on the EU, it is difficult to see how its economy can keep on defying the laws of gravity.
Indeed, Turkey is now beginning to suffer the repercussions of Europe's economic woes. Exports have plummeted, with revenues linked to EU markets decreasing by an average of 30% in 2009. Turkish exporters now view with increasing concern the austerity package introduced by the German government. Foreign investments from EU countries are starting to dry up, having decreased by 40% in the past 12 months. In addition, the euro's depreciation is causing its trade deficit to balloon, since most of Turkey's export earnings are in euros and its imports are in dollars.
So, for the foreseeable future the Turkish economy will be affected by the recovery in Europe. That will create additional difficulties for Turkey's membership bid, which has already stalled because of a lack of political will in the EU. To gain support for the austerity measures that they will have to adopt at home, European leaders will need all the political capital they can muster. They are unlikely to expend much capital on selling the benefits of future enlargement to an increasingly sceptical public.
But Turkey's economic performance should remain relatively strong. It will remain among the few European countries that fulfil the Maastricht criteria on public debt. Its growth will be faster than that of many eurozone members, and so the convergence of incomes with the EU average will be more visible. And the fundamental factors that made Turkey resilient during the crisis will continue to help it.
Despite the brake put on Turkey's economic performance by the EU's difficulties, this period of crisis should confirm the country's status as an emerging regional power.
Gradually, the EU may also grow to see Turkey's economic performance as a valuable asset for the EU, rather than as a liability. If so, the crisis in the eurozone may prove a blessing in disguise for Turkey – a changed view of Turkey's economy could revitalise Turkey's membership perspective.
About the Author
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Sinan Ülgen is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe in Brussels, where his research focuses on Turkish foreign policy, transatlantic relations, international trade, economic security, and digital policy.
- The EU Equivocating on Turkey Is Bad GeopoliticsCommentary
- Can the EU Achieve Its Tech Ambitions?Q&A
Raluca Csernatoni, Sinan Ülgen
Recent Work
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie India
- India–Africa Strategic Partnership: Challenges, Potential, and Possible PathwaysArticle
A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.
Rajiv Bhatia
- Emerging From the “Zombie State” of Trade Agreements: The India-EU FTACommentary
The India–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is shaping up to be one of the most consequential trade negotiations, both economically and strategically. But, what’s in the agreement, what’s missing, and what will determine its success in the years ahead
Vrinda Sahai, Nicolas Köhler-Suzuki
- India’s Press Note 3 Gamble: Opening the FDI Door to ChinaArticle
On March 10, 2026, India’s Union Cabinet approved amendments to Press Note 3, a regulation that mandated government approval on all foreign direct investment (FDI) from countries sharing a land border with India. This amendment raises questions primarily about whether its stated benefits will materialize and if the risks have been adequately weighed. This piece will address the same.
Konark Bhandari
- India and a Changing Global Order: Foreign Policy in the Trump 2.0 EraResearch
Trump 2.0 has unsettled India’s external environment—but has not overturned its foreign policy strategy, which continues to rely on diversification, hedging, and calibrated partnerships across a fractured order.
- +6
Milan Vaishnav, ed., Sameer Lalwani, Tanvi Madan, …
- The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil ImportsCommentary
This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.
Vrinda Sahai