• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "James M. Acton"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "NPP",
  "programs": [
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "Japan"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Nuclear Policy",
    "Nuclear Energy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Cause for Concern at Japan’s Damaged Fukushima Nuclear Plant

In Japan’s damaged Fukushima nuclear plant, six spent fuel pools and three reactor cores have the potential to release significant radiation into the atmosphere.

Link Copied
By James M. Acton
Published on Mar 16, 2011

Source: CBS

KATIE COURIC, CBS ANCHOR: James Acton in Washington is a nuclear safety expert with the Carnegie Endowment. James, what is the biggest cause for concern at this point?

JAMES ACTON, CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT: Well, Katie right now the biggest cause for concern is probably the highly radioactive used nuclear fuel, because that material is sitting outside of the heavily reinforced containment building. And all that`s standing between it and the outside world is a big pool of water, and a weak outer containment shell.

COURIC: The head of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission said today that it believes that around the reactor site, there are high levels of radiation, potentially lethal doses that may prevent emergency workers from getting near the reactors. What is your reaction to that?

ACTON: It is clearly deeply concerning. But we’ve seen in the limited history of nuclear disasters some extraordinary acts of heroism, and I’m thinking here in particular of the Soviet workers during the Chernobyl accident who after that massive explosion that blew a hole in the roof, went up on the roof and literally with shovels, put used nuclear fuel back down into the reactor core. And I have no doubt whatsoever that if the need calls -- and we very much hope it doesn`t -- but if the need calls for those Japanese workers they`re going to show every bit the same level of bravery.

COURIC: If the situation doesn`t improve, James, what is the worst- case scenario here?

ACTON: You know, we now have nine different areas of concern. We have six spent fuel pools, and we have three reactor cores. And all of those have the potential to lead to significant releases of radiation into the environment. I think the worst case here, which is very serious, is long-term, it would be an increase in the rate of cancer as a result of radiation. But I think, again, it`s worth emphasizing -- we`re unlikely to see a catastrophic release of radiation on the scale of Chernobyl, and the number of deaths that result from this reactor incident is likely to be far below the number killed in the tsunami.

COURIC: James Acton.

About the Author

James M. Acton

Jessica T. Mathews Chair, Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program

Acton holds the Jessica T. Mathews Chair and is co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Recent Work

  • Other
    Unpacking Trump’s National Security Strategy
      • Cecily Brewer
      • +18

      James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …

  • Commentary
    Trump Has an Out on Nuclear Testing. He Should Take It.

      James M. Acton

James M. Acton
Jessica T. Mathews Chair, Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program
James M. Acton
Nuclear PolicyNuclear EnergyEast AsiaJapan

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Commentary
    On Thin Ice: Bhutan’s Diplomatic Challenge Amid the India-China Border Dispute

    This piece examines the strategic implications of Bhutan’s diplomatic efforts amid its border dispute with China, highlighting the thin ice it walks on to achieve a resolution without compromising its vital relationships.

      Shibani Mehta

  • Commentary
    A Quad Initiative on Digital Public Infrastructure

    With India set to host the sixth Quad Leaders' Summit in 2024, there is every opportunity for this minilateral to not only develop a DPI initiative but also execute pilots in the Indo-Pacific. This essay shares a rationale for how the four Quad countries could achieve this goal.

      Rudra Chaudhuri, Aadya Gupta

  • Commentary
    India’s Quest for Advanced Technology in the Era of Export Controls

    How can India navigate export control measures at a time when it is also entering into technology-centric partnerships with other nations to secure enhanced access to advanced technology?

      Konark Bhandari

  • Article
    Impasse at the LAC: An Examination of the 2013, 2014, and 2015 Standoffs

    This article examines the significance of the 2013, 2014, and 2015 border standoffs between India and China. It presents a detailed account of the border crises and how the two countries tried to manage them.

      Shibani Mehta

  • Commentary
    China and India Aren’t Reaching a Strategic Détente

    Contrary to some recent analyses, this commentary explains why a strategic détente between India and China is unlikely.

      Saheb Singh Chadha

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.