- +18
James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …
{
"authors": [
"James M. Acton"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"Japan"
],
"topics": [
"Nuclear Policy",
"Nuclear Energy"
]
}Source: Getty
Pivotal Moment in Japan?
Much remains unknown as Japan attempts to cool the nuclear reactors and spent fuel rods at its damaged Fukushima nuclear plant, including whether restoring electricity to the cooling systems will help prevent the crisis from growing.
Source: CBS
KATIE COURIC, CBS: James Acton with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is a physicist and an expert on nuclear safety. James, Japanese officials acknowledged what U.S. officials said yesterday, those spent fuel rods, more than 11,000 of them in rapidly evaporating pools are the real danger. Why initially were there two different assessments of the situation?
JAMES ACTON, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: In many ways I think there probably still are two different assessments of the situation. There`s no question that the evaporating fuel pools is serious. Without all of that water as shielding, this site is going to become much more heavily irradiated and consequently harder to move around and work it. But I think there`s a genuine disagreement here over the chances that without the cooling effect of water these fuel rods could ignite. And there`s a disagreement over how risky that is compared to the consequences of a meltdown.
COURIC: Are helicopters and water hoses really the best solution to this crisis?
ACTON: Probably yes is the answer to that one. We’re far beyond the playbook on this. There`s no manual, there`s no emergency equipment, to deal with this kind of extreme situation. So right now the Japanese government are being forced to improvise.
COURIC: If the power comes on, will that solve the problem?
ACTON: I don`t know, but this is going to be a pivotal moment when the power comes on because if the cooling systems in the reactors and fuel ponds are basically sound and then the power comes on, then that -- We might look at that moment as the beginning of the end of this crisis. If, however, the cooling systems are damaged and the power comes on, they might not function correctly and this crisis could continue.
COURIC: James Acton of the Carnegie Endowment. Thank you.
ACTON: Thank you, Katie.
About the Author
Jessica T. Mathews Chair, Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program
Acton holds the Jessica T. Mathews Chair and is co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- Unpacking Trump’s National Security StrategyOther
- Trump Has an Out on Nuclear Testing. He Should Take It.Commentary
James M. Acton
Recent Work
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie India
- On Thin Ice: Bhutan’s Diplomatic Challenge Amid the India-China Border DisputeCommentary
This piece examines the strategic implications of Bhutan’s diplomatic efforts amid its border dispute with China, highlighting the thin ice it walks on to achieve a resolution without compromising its vital relationships.
Shibani Mehta
- A Quad Initiative on Digital Public InfrastructureCommentary
With India set to host the sixth Quad Leaders' Summit in 2024, there is every opportunity for this minilateral to not only develop a DPI initiative but also execute pilots in the Indo-Pacific. This essay shares a rationale for how the four Quad countries could achieve this goal.
Rudra Chaudhuri, Aadya Gupta
- India’s Quest for Advanced Technology in the Era of Export ControlsCommentary
How can India navigate export control measures at a time when it is also entering into technology-centric partnerships with other nations to secure enhanced access to advanced technology?
Konark Bhandari
- Impasse at the LAC: An Examination of the 2013, 2014, and 2015 StandoffsArticle
This article examines the significance of the 2013, 2014, and 2015 border standoffs between India and China. It presents a detailed account of the border crises and how the two countries tried to manage them.
Shibani Mehta
- China and India Aren’t Reaching a Strategic DétenteCommentary
Contrary to some recent analyses, this commentary explains why a strategic détente between India and China is unlikely.
Saheb Singh Chadha