{
"authors": [],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
The current eurozone debt crisis is endangering effective EU external relations. If the EU wants to help maintain global freedom, prosperity, and security, investment in foreign policy is key.
Source: EUobserver
We are seriously concerned about the impact that the current eurozone debt crisis is having on the external relations of the Union.
The first casualty is the time available for foreign policy. We recognise and support your efforts to overcome the current crisis but it is important that our relations with third countries do not suffer as a consequence. Important summits have been postponed and there is less time to focus on priority issues such as supporting the transitions in North Africa.
A second problem is the resources available for foreign policy. The EU’s budget for external affairs is already small and any further cuts would seriously impact on the EU’s pretensions to play a global role.
A third potential problem is access to the EU’s market. There are many voices calling for protection against ‘unfair competition’ from third countries. We consider it important to maintain an open EU market albeit access based on reciprocity as regards our strategic partners.
A fourth factor is the damage to the EU’s image as a well-governed entity, an important basis for the EU’s attraction as a soft power. Restoring the EU’s economic health would of course help repair the damage to our image.
Fifth, the US global footprint is set to decline due to budget cuts. This means that the EU will have to take more responsibility for its own security and regional security. It is important that this case is put to EU citizens.
Furthermore, ensuring the continuation of a strong liberal world order that emerged after the Second World War remains a key European interest. It is essential that emerging powers become stakeholders in that order.
Only a strong, united and self-confident EU can help strengthen and further develop global institutions and rules that are a necessity to ensure European security and prosperity.
The external relations of the EU cannot be seen as an afterthought. An inward looking EU will be at the mercy of others. And it will not be able to shape the global order according to its values and interests. Investment in foreign policy is an investment in the long-term viability of European freedom, prosperity and security.
Fraser Cameron, EU-Asia Centre
Ulrich Speck, Global Europe Initiative
Josef Janning, European Policy Centre
Pierre Defraigne, Madariaga, College of Europe Foundation
Charles Grant, Centre for European Reform
Shada Islam, Friends of Europe
Gustaaf Geererts, Brussels Institute of Contemporary China Studies
Gerald Knaus, European Stability Initiative
Nicu Popescu, European Council on Foreign Relations
Michael Emerson, Centre for European Policy Studies
Ulrike Guérot, European Council on Foreign Relations
Fabrizio Tassinari, Danish Institute for International Studies
José Ignacio Torreblanca, European Council on Foreign Relations
Jonas Parello-Plesner, European Council on Foreign Relations
Rosa Balfour, European Policy Centre
Giles Merritt, Security and Defence Agenda
Geert Cami, Friends of Europe
Richard Youngs, FRIDE
Ben Judah, European Council on Foreign Relations
Pawel Swieboda, Demos Europa
Dimitar Bechev, European Council on Foreign Relations
Sven Biscop, Egmont Institute
Stefani Weiss, Bertelsmann Stiftung
Daniel Korski, European Council on Foreign Relations
Ralf Fücks, Heinrich Böll Stiftung
Sami Andoura, Notre Europe
Jan Techau, Carnegie Europe
Heather Grabbe, Open Society Foundation
Richard Gowan, European Council on Foreign Relations
Amanda Paul, European Policy Centre
Tomas Valasek, Centre for European Reform
Constanze Stelzenmüller, German Marshall Fund
Almut Möller, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
After the chill in ties between 2020 and 2024 that brought India–China relations to their lowest point in several decades, the two countries have engaged each other afresh. This paper argues that there are predominantly four imperatives guiding India’s approach to China, and they exist in an order of priority.
Saheb Singh Chadha
This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.
Vrinda Sahai
The ASML MoU with Tata Electronics is an indicator of how far the Indian semiconductor ecosystem has come. This ecosystem has been years in the making and represents real commercial logic.
Konark Bhandari
A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.
Rajiv Bhatia
The India–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is shaping up to be one of the most consequential trade negotiations, both economically and strategically. But, what’s in the agreement, what’s missing, and what will determine its success in the years ahead
Vrinda Sahai, Nicolas Köhler-Suzuki