This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.
Vrinda Sahai
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}REQUIRED IMAGE
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spoke at the Carnegie Endowment to mark the State Department’s release of its annual International Religious Freedom Report.
WASHINGTON—U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton today called on governments to actively protect religious minorities and the rights of all their citizens to practice different religions freely. Speaking at the Carnegie Endowment to mark the State Department’s release of its annual International Religious Freedom Report, she said religious freedom is “a cherished constitutional value, a strategic national interest, and a foreign policy priority.”
Secretary Clinton characterized religious freedom as a crucial “safety valve.” Particularly in the context of the Arab Awakening, she argued that “it lets people have a say over important aspects of their lives, join their societies fully, and channel their frustrations into constructive outlets.”
Talking about her recent visit to Egypt, Secretary Clinton said, “President Morsi has said clearly and repeatedly in public and private that he intends to be the president of all the Egyptian people. He has pledged to appoint an inclusive government and put women and Christians in high leadership positions. The Egyptian people and the international community are looking to him to follow through on those commitments.”
Secretary Clinton noted that Christians were “feeling under pressure” in a lot of places in the Middle East, partly because of the rise to power of Islamist parties. She expressed concern that respect for religious freedom is tenuous and that sectarian violence has increased in Egypt since the fall of Mubarak.
Citing Iraq, Lebanon, Egypt, and a number of other countries, she argued that “leaders have to be active in stepping in and sending messages about protecting the diversity within their countries. And frankly, I don’t see enough of that.” She said that the United States will continue to “push and prod and persuade and then, if necessary, look at ways to use consequences that can send a very clear message” to governments that do not protect the religious freedoms of their people.
Press Contact: Charita Law, claw@ceip.org, 202-939-2233
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.
Vrinda Sahai
A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.
Rajiv Bhatia
The U.S.–India semiconductor cooperation story is well-stocked with top-level strategic intent. What remains unresolved, however, are some underlying challenges that will determine whether the cooperation actually functions. Three such friction points stand out.
Shruti Mittal
The India–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is shaping up to be one of the most consequential trade negotiations, both economically and strategically. But, what’s in the agreement, what’s missing, and what will determine its success in the years ahead
Vrinda Sahai, Nicolas Köhler-Suzuki
Trump 2.0 has unsettled India’s external environment—but has not overturned its foreign policy strategy, which continues to rely on diversification, hedging, and calibrated partnerships across a fractured order.
Milan Vaishnav, ed., Sameer Lalwani, Tanvi Madan, …