• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Moisés Naím"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Economy",
    "Global Governance"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Being In Charge Ain’t What It Used to Be

Although the change in power dynamics has led to increased competition and advanced opportunities for voters, citizens, workers, and entrepreneurs, it is also tied to the political gridlock taking place around the world.

Link Copied
By Moisés Naím
Published on Mar 28, 2013

Source: Yahoo's Daily Ticker

Speaking on Yahoo's Daily Ticker, Carnegie's Moisés Naím discussed the fleeting nature of power. Chief executives in 30 of 34 democracies are dealing with a parliament controlled by the opposition, as landslide victories are becoming "endangered species." Political gridlock has been observed at home in Washington, D.C. with the sequester, as well as abroad with the outcome of the Italian elections. The trend is evidenced in corporations as well, asserted Naím. Although the financial sector continues to be powerful, the use and the capacity of their power are constrained.

Although this change in power dynamics seems beneficial and a shift to celebrate, there are risks, Naím continued. Aside from the increased competition, more intense scrutiny, and advanced opportunities for voters, citizens, workers, and entrepreneurs, the downside is manifesting in the gridlock observed in politics. Gridlock is creating weaker democracies with governments incapable of delivering timely decisions effectively. This is in turn making decisions on a global level more difficult. Furthermore, the capacity for countries to work collaboratively to tackle issues is declining, explained Naím.

It would be too simple to say the Internet, media, and other IT revolutionary technologies are the driving forces, Naím added. These are simply tools that are being used by users. But these users are being driven, directed, and motivated by tertiary factors. These tectonic changes, as Naím described them, include changes in demographics as well as the international distribution of assets and activities. The forces behind the shift in power can be categorized as either the More revolution, the Mobility revolution, and the Mentality revolution.

This interview was originally broadcast on Yahoo's Daily Ticker.

About the Author

Moisés Naím

Distinguished Fellow

Moisés Naím is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a best-selling author, and an internationally syndicated columnist.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    The World Reacts to Biden’s First 100 Days
      • +10

      Rosa Balfour, Frances Z. Brown, Yasmine Farouk, …

  • Commentary
    View From Latin America

      Moisés Naím

Moisés Naím
Distinguished Fellow
Moisés Naím
Political ReformEconomyGlobal GovernanceNorth America

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Commentary
    The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil Imports

    This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Paper
    India-China Economic Ties: Determinants and Possibilities

    This paper examines the evolution of India-China economic ties from 2005 to 2025. It explores the impact of global events, bilateral political ties, and domestic policies on distinct spheres of the economic relationship.

      Santosh Pai

  • Commentary
    TRUST and Tariffs

    The India-U.S. relationship currently appears buffeted between three “Ts”—TRUST, Tariffs, and Trump.

      Arun K. Singh

  • Article
    Can Geopolitical Alignment Seal the India-EU FTA?

    This article argues that the geopolitical circumstances have never been more conducive, not merely for the early conclusion of the free trade agreement (FTA) between India and the EU, but also for crafting a substantive and comprehensive strategic partnership.

      Mohan Kumar

  • Source: iStock
    Commentary
    What’s Next for U.S. AI Policy?

    This commentary explores the likely actions of the Trump administration and driving forces on issues of deregulation, the United States’ leadership in AI, national security, and global engagements on AI safety.

      Shatakratu Sahu, Amlan Mohanty

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.