• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
Technology
{
  "authors": [
    "Andrew S. Weiss"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Europe’s Eastern Neighborhood"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "russia",
  "programs": [
    "Russia and Eurasia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia",
    "Eastern Europe",
    "Ukraine",
    "Western Europe",
    "Europe"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Economy",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

How Did Ukraine Get Into a Tug of War Between Russia and the EU?

Putin’s Eurasian Union would be a set of political and economic structures, similar to the EU, that Russia would dominate. But this vision comes with a price; Ukraine’s economy is in trouble, just as Russia is suffering from low economic growth.

Link Copied
By Andrew S. Weiss
Published on Dec 4, 2013

Source: Public Radio International’s World

"There is no doubt that we've seen a heavy-handed Russian approach to these agreements and there's no question that the Russians, on a gradual and determined basis, tried to stop the Ukrainians from signing the deal with the European Union," says Andrew Weiss, vice president of studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Weiss, who was director of Russian, Ukrainian and Eurasian affairs for the Clinton Administration, says Putin's Eurasian Union would be a set of political and economic structures, similar to the EU, that Russia would dominate. Putin wants to get all the former Soviet bloc countries into this union and Ukraine is the most desirable piece, mainly because it is the biggest of the post-Soviet countries, by far. 

But Putin will have to pay for this vision, says Weiss. For one thing, Ukraine's economy is in trouble, just as Russia is suffering from low economic growth. He thinks Russia will have to subsidize the Ukrainian economy.

"I think Ukraine is just a month or two away from some form of economic calamity," Weiss says. "There's something here that doesn't totally add up. Putin seems to be putting geopolitics above shrewd economic sense."

On the EU side, Weiss says that the foreign ministers of Sweden and Poland have been the main drivers of bringing Ukraine into the European Union's sphere. Other core EU players, like Germany, France and Britain, have generally been indifferent.

"What you ended up with was an EU initiative that was overly ambitious, delivered very little short term benefit for Ukraine and set Ukraine up for a sharp confrontation with the Russians," argues Weiss. There wasn't enough in the deal for Ukraine to break its economic ties with Russia.

Ukrainians themselves are divided over which partner to embrace. The protesters in Kiev are pro-Europe, but much of the country shares deep roots with Russia. And Weiss is worried for the Ukrainians.

"They are stuck," he says. "They have an economic crisis. They are facing, basically, running out of cash within the next couple months. President Yanukovych is up for re-election in 2015, and so the whole situation is veering very dangerously toward a very uncertain and very destabilizing conclusion."

This interview was originally aired on Public Radio International’s World.

Andrew S. Weiss
James Family Chair, Vice President for Studies
Andrew S. Weiss
Political ReformEconomyForeign PolicyRussiaEastern EuropeUkraineWestern EuropeEurope

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Commentary
    The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil Imports

    This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Paper
    India-China Economic Ties: Determinants and Possibilities

    This paper examines the evolution of India-China economic ties from 2005 to 2025. It explores the impact of global events, bilateral political ties, and domestic policies on distinct spheres of the economic relationship.

      Santosh Pai

  • Commentary
    NISAR Soars While India-U.S. Tariff Tensions Simmer

    On July 30, 2025, the United States announced 25 percent tariffs on Indian goods. While diplomatic tensions simmered on the trade front, a cosmic calm prevailed at the Sriharikota launch range. Officials from NASA and ISRO were preparing to launch an engineering marvel into space—the NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR), marking a significant milestone in the India-U.S. bilateral partnership.

      Tejas Bharadwaj

  • Commentary
    TRUST and Tariffs

    The India-U.S. relationship currently appears buffeted between three “Ts”—TRUST, Tariffs, and Trump.

      Arun K. Singh

  • Commentary
    Indian Airstrikes in Pakistan: May 7, 2025

    On May 7, 2025, between 1:05 and 1:30 a.m. (IST), airstrikes carried out by the Indian Air Force hit nine locations inside Pakistan and Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK). It was codenamed Operation Sindoor.

      Rudra Chaudhuri

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.