• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Deborah Gordon"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "SCP",
  "programs": [
    "Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
  ],
  "projects": [
    "Carnegie Oil Initiative"
  ],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Climate Change"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

U.S. Energy Independence Is Unlikely

While the energy boom in the United States is increasing domestic access to oil and gas and growing exports of petroleum products, it is unlikely that this will translate into U.S. energy independence.

Link Copied
By Deborah Gordon
Published on Dec 13, 2013
Project hero Image

Project

Carnegie Oil Initiative

The Carnegie Oil Initiative analyzed global oils, assessing their differences from climate, environmental, economic, and geopolitical perspectives. This knowledge provides strategic guidance and policy frameworks for decision making.

Learn More

Source: International Economy Magazine

While the energy boom in the United States is increasing domestic access to oil and gas and growing exports of petroleum products, it is unlikely that this will translate into U.S. energy independence.

Factors beyond our control are likely to steer the U.S. away from independence. Some of these uncertainties include demand growth in emerging economies, future energy prices, and durable trade agreements, as well as the degree of policy intervention on climate change, water, and other societal impacts of fossil fuel use. The upsurge of tight oil, shale gas, other unconventional resources, and yet-to-be-discovered fossil fuels—in the United States and elsewhere—will only make the world more energy interdependent than ever before.

Setting politics aside, the technological push to develop different, difficult, and potentially more dangerous oil and gas resources is being driven by the unbridled power of the global marketplace. Petroleum products made from both U.S. oil and natural gas are extremely valuable and supplies to Asia, Europe, and elsewhere are on the rise. Pressure to ramp up liquefied natural gas exports is building. Direct sale of American crude oil to foreign markets could be the next energy foray.

With overall fossil fuel consumption currently flat or falling in America and Western Europe, growth in energy demand is in emerging economies. These burgeoning importers therefore are gaining influence in global energy markets. Exporting countries, including America, will increasingly reorient themselves to those markets. As such, the fossil fuel commodities produced domestically are not guaranteed to stay at home. The expanding array of fossil fuels is more likely to circumnavigate the globe. U.S. fossil fuel production could ultimately do more to trigger competition between global energy trade flows than fuel domestic independence.

If the ultimate goal is self-sufficiency, sovereignty, and security, the road to energy independence cannot be paved predominantly with fossil fuels. Energy efficiency and diversification into alternative renewable energy sources both need to play a far greater role on a worldwide scale.

Abundant fossil fuel supplies alone do not guarantee the United States and others energy independence. Just look at Saudi Arabia, Russia, and increasingly Canada. None of these countries have been able to isolate themselves from the world and avoid the economic and political struggles that oil and gas resource endowments bring.

Despite the hype and hubris, managing energy supplies will be an increasingly complex undertaking, one that needs to account for the externalities—climate change, water stresses, and various local impacts—that loom large. With the larger goal of international peace and security in mind, don’t be surprised if the United States continues to struggle with managing its energy bounty, whether it attains some measure of independence or not.

This article was originally published by International Economy Magazine.

About the Author

Deborah Gordon

Former Director and Senior Fellow, Energy and Climate Program

Gordon was director of Carnegie’s Energy and Climate Program, where her research focuses on oil and climate change issues in North America and globally.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Petroleum Companies Need a Credible Climate Plan

      Deborah Gordon, Stephen D. Ziman

  • Article
    Advancing Public Climate Engineering Disclosure

      Deborah Gordon, Smriti Kumble, David Livingston

Deborah Gordon
Former Director and Senior Fellow, Energy and Climate Program
Deborah Gordon
Climate ChangeNorth AmericaUnited States

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Commentary
    India Signs the Pax Silica—A Counter to Pax Sinica?

    On the last day of the India AI Impact Summit, India signed Pax Silica, a U.S.-led declaration seemingly focused on semiconductors. While India’s accession to the same was not entirely unforeseen, becoming a signatory nation this quickly was not on the cards either.

      Konark Bhandari

  • Commentary
    The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil Imports

    This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Commentary
    NISAR Soars While India-U.S. Tariff Tensions Simmer

    On July 30, 2025, the United States announced 25 percent tariffs on Indian goods. While diplomatic tensions simmered on the trade front, a cosmic calm prevailed at the Sriharikota launch range. Officials from NASA and ISRO were preparing to launch an engineering marvel into space—the NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR), marking a significant milestone in the India-U.S. bilateral partnership.

      Tejas Bharadwaj

  • Commentary
    TRUST and Tariffs

    The India-U.S. relationship currently appears buffeted between three “Ts”—TRUST, Tariffs, and Trump.

      Arun K. Singh

  • Commentary
    The India-U.S. TRUST Initiative: Advancing Semiconductor Supply Chain Cooperation

    As part of the TRUST initiative, leaders of the two countries committed to building trusted and resilient supply chains, including for semiconductors and critical minerals. India and the United States have made steady progress in this area over the years. This essay explores the takeaways from discussions on semiconductor supply chains that took place at Carnegie India’s 9th Global Technology Summit.

      Konark Bhandari

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.