Commentary
Dmitri Trenin
{
"authors": [
"Dmitri Trenin"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"Russia"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
John Mroz, a Public Diplomat (1948-2014)
John Mroz, who died earlier this month, was the founder of the EastWest Institute, a novel concept of a “think and do tank” which sought to organize Track 2 and Track 1.5 discussions across the Cold War divide. Mroz has departed precisely at the moment when the need for his services has peaked again.
Published on Aug 26, 2014
John Mroz, who died earlier this month, was well known to those Russians who, over the last three decades, participated in public policy exchanges with their American colleagues. Back in 1980 Mroz founded the EastWest Institute, a novel concept of a "think and do tank" which sought to organize Track 2 and Track 1.5 discussions across the Cold War divide.
It would be correct to say that John himself was a global institution. His ebullient energy allowed him to reach the high and mighty around the world and engage them in the cause of greater international security. The issues he took up ranged from Israel-PLO dialogue to Germany's reunification to U.S.-Russian cooperation on ballistic missile defense. Sometimes these engagements produced policy outcomes, sometimes not, but they always left an impact.
As the United States and Russia have just entered a new period of bitter rivalry, serious dialogue between their concerned citizens is as important as it was in 1980, when John Mroz founded his institute. However, ironically, there is less recognition now of the urgency of this task and less willingness to take it up.
Leaving U.S.-Russian relations to occasional phone calls between the Kremlin and the White House and the periodic meetings between the two countries' foreign ministers is not a good option when the media on both sides are becoming increasingly polemical, with many journalists and experts acting as combatants in an information warfare.
A new effort to structure serious discussions between Russians and Americans is sorely needed. Track 2 and Track 1.5 exchanges are indispensable for moving the U.S.-Russian relationship off the dangerous course it has taken. John Mroz has departed precisely at the moment when the need for his services has peaked again. He will be missed.
About the Author
Dmitri Trenin
Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center
Trenin was director of the Carnegie Moscow Center from 2008 to early 2022.
- Mapping Russia’s New Approach to the Post-Soviet Space
- What a Week of Talks Between Russia and the West RevealedCommentary
Dmitri Trenin
Recent Work
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie India
- What Could a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement Do for U.S.-India Ties?Article
India and the United States are close to concluding a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement (RDPA) that will allow firms from the two countries to sell to each other’s defense establishments more easily. While this may not remedy the specific grievances both sides may have regarding larger bilateral issues, an RDPA could restore some momentum, following the trade deal announcement.
Konark Bhandari
- India Signs the Pax Silica—A Counter to Pax Sinica?Commentary
On the last day of the India AI Impact Summit, India signed Pax Silica, a U.S.-led declaration seemingly focused on semiconductors. While India’s accession to the same was not entirely unforeseen, becoming a signatory nation this quickly was not on the cards either.
Konark Bhandari
- The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil ImportsCommentary
This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.
Vrinda Sahai
- NISAR Soars While India-U.S. Tariff Tensions SimmerCommentary
On July 30, 2025, the United States announced 25 percent tariffs on Indian goods. While diplomatic tensions simmered on the trade front, a cosmic calm prevailed at the Sriharikota launch range. Officials from NASA and ISRO were preparing to launch an engineering marvel into space—the NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR), marking a significant milestone in the India-U.S. bilateral partnership.
Tejas Bharadwaj
- TRUST and TariffsCommentary
The India-U.S. relationship currently appears buffeted between three “Ts”—TRUST, Tariffs, and Trump.
Arun K. Singh
